Natalie Walton has been left confused ever since she received a fine for dropping a cigarette in a village, nearly 300 kilometres from her home — a place she had not visited in over a decade. The fixed penalty notice (FPN), addressed to Ms Walton, was sent to her parent’s house in Gravesend, Kent, accusing her of littering in nearby Swanscombe. The notice, dated November 12, stated a Dartford council officer witnessed her “committing an offence” which was also recorded on a body-worn camera, on October 29 and that she needed to pay a £75 (Rs 8,082) fine or appeal it.
The notice added that Ms Walton could be taken to court and if convicted, she may have to pay a fine “up to & £2,500 (Rs 2,69,410) for littering”.
“As neither the payment nor the written challenge has been received, you remain liable for the offence and prosecution proceedings in the magistrates’ court may begin immediately against you,” the notice added.
Ms Walton claimed that she could not have been the accused as she is a non-smoker and has not visited the place where the offence took place, since she was a kid. Ms Walton added she had an alibi which proved she was not even in Kent at the time of the supposed offence.
“I had not been to Kent for months. Dartford council were trying to fine me £75 for something I was not even there to do. It is just a bit bizarre. I was accused of littering a cigarette in Swanscombe which is honestly more absurd, as I do not smoke and have never been to the address they have claimed I was at,” she was quoted as saying by KentOnline.
“I feel like a complete victim of fraud. Someone must have stolen my identity or the council’s security measures are so broken they will take a name and address with no proof.”
Watch: Man Eats Banana Artwork He Bought For Rs 52 Crore In Auction
Evidence presented
As the controversy snowballed, Ms Walton produced her bank transactions, proving she was shopping in B&M and Tesco in Staffordshire at the time of the littering incident. After her protest and examination of the evidence, the Dartford Council said Ms Walton’s FPN was cancelled.
“When I saw the email, I was relieved and felt so much less stressed but I still have no idea how they thought it was me,” she said.
The council, meanwhile, said the real accused had given the wrong address to the officers and pointed them towards Ms Walton.
“Our enforcement team requested a current photo of Ms Walton and upon receiving it was compared to the person in the footage. It was found it was not Ms Walton and the FPN has now been cancelled.”
The council is still investigating who the real offender is but was unable to provide a photo.
Despite the fine being revoked, Ms Walton said the entire ordeal had left her stressed, especially when she is getting married in two weeks.
