EEG – Artifex.News https://artifex.news Stay Connected. Stay Informed. Fri, 22 May 2026 11:45:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3 https://artifex.news/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cropped-cropped-app-logo-32x32.png EEG – Artifex.News https://artifex.news 32 32 Language learning begins in the womb https://artifex.news/article60036811-ece/ Fri, 22 May 2026 11:45:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article60036811-ece/ Read More “Language learning begins in the womb” »

]]>

By >Josephine Lethbridge , The Conversation 

Human foetuses begin to hear sounds outside the womb at about 27 weeks. But whether foetuses can learn from these sounds in ways that shape speech perception and development during infancy has remained unclear.

>New research from the University of Helsinki suggests that humans begin to distinguish between sounds before they are even born. Eino Partanen and colleagues explored how prenatal experiences influence learning. “We wanted to find out what kind of material foetuses can learn in the womb, what kind of neural representations they form,” he said. 

People started to become interested in foetal learning in the 1980s. It was only then that researchers picked up on the widespread anecdotal evidence on the topic. There are >frequent stories of infants apparently recognising and responding to music that was played to them before birth. 

Alexandra Lamont, who specialises in developmental psychology, specifically that of music, explained this. “Sound can be quite clearly heard in the womb,” she said. “Once the necessary brain development has taken place to enable learning, the foetus certainly can learn music or other sounds before birth.”

“This is one reason why newborn infants have a preference for their own mother’s voice, as they have had extended experience with hearing that voice before birth.”

Partanen wanted to prove this on a more detailed level. “Can babies learn from the music, speech, stories that they hear from the womb?” he said. “We were interested in looking at this from a neurophysiological angle.”

In order to find out Partanen and his colleagues used basic sounds. The foetuses in their studies were not played opera or told fairy tales: instead, participating families played a recording of a repeated sound several times a week during pregnancy. This sound was the pseudoword “tatata”. Occasionally this sound was varied with a subtle pitch increment in the middle syllable.

Very soon after birth, researchers compared responses to such sounds to infants who had been exposed to it whilst in the womb, as well as those who had not. They recorded the electrical activity of the brains of the infants using >EEG . They found that the infants who had been exposed reacted much more strongly to the sounds. Furthermore, these infants were capable of discriminating the small pitch differences between them. 

This proves, Partanen said, that “infants are capable of learning the small building blocks of language in the foetal stage. We know that this is much more specific than we thought previously – they respond to subtle changes in verbalisation.”

Can this be developed into any kind of therapy or intervention for infants? Partanen thinks so. Problems such as dyslexia, he thinks, could be approached at a much earlier level. Although there is no way of knowing whether a baby is going to develop dyslexia, with some degree there are factors that you can look into to see whether or not they are at risk. >Dyslexia is partly genetic , for example. In this case, prenatal therapy could be developed for risk groups in order to facilitate learning. 

Dr Lamont cautioned that this, if possible, would be a long way off. “While phonological skills do seem to be a useful treatment for dyslexia in young children,” she explained, “we would be a long way from finding out if prenatal exposure to systematic sounds would be of any benefit.”

Partenen is hopeful though. “Our findings do not mean we can make superbabies!“ he said. “But hope to find out if we could help infants that might have specific deficits from a very early stage.”

This article was originally published at >The Conversation . Read the >original article . 



Source link

]]>
A century after the EEG was discovered, it remains a crucial tool for understanding the brain https://artifex.news/article68032401-ece/ Fri, 05 Apr 2024 12:37:36 +0000 https://artifex.news/article68032401-ece/ Read More “A century after the EEG was discovered, it remains a crucial tool for understanding the brain” »

]]>

Jena, Germany, 1924: Working in near-isolation and with painstaking tediousness, the psychiatrist Hans Berger observes rhythmic electrical activity from the scalp of human subjects. He is convinced the activity arises from within the brain and coins the term “electroencephalogram.”

It is 10 years before the scientific community accepts Berger’s work, birthing the field of electroencephalography, or EEG for short.

Today, the electroencephalogram – also abbreviated as EEG – is widely known as a medical test measuring brain electrical activity that’s used on patients who have, or are suspected to have, neurological disorders. The EEG provides a window into the living brain, with a continuous electrical readout of what is happening inside our heads. The procedure may be short, often just a 30-minute recording. But for patients monitored for diagnosis or treatment of brain disease, it can be continued for much longer – days or even weeks.

As a neurologist specializing in epilepsy, I use EEG on a daily basis. Our team at the University of Florida interprets thousands of EEGs a year in neurological patients. I also run a research lab where our goal is to understand the basic structure of the EEG in health and disease.

A history of unexpected twists

The story of EEG is colorful and littered with fables. Berger’s interest in brain electricity was not to combat disease, though that was his day job as a physician, but to find a biological basis for his belief in telepathy. He wondered whether the brain waves of EEG could convey thoughts through space, allowing people to read each other’s minds. He was unsuccessful in his mission, but the field he founded nonetheless took off.

By the mid-1930s, researchers had observed the striking differences between the awake and asleep EEG. The EEGs of patients with brain disease turned up a variety of unprecedented observations.

And then came a defining moment for modern medicine. In December 1934, a group of Boston physicians observed the rhythmic EEG spike-wave appearance of seizures in patients with “petit mal” epilepsy. Petit mal is an anachronistic term for a type of epilepsy where a patient’s flow of thought, speech or action momentarily freezes during seizures. For the first time, the symptoms and behavior of patients during seizures were correlated to a brain signal occurring in lockstep.

EEG quickly evolved from a scientific curiosity to a mainstream clinical tool. The first clinical EEG laboratory was set up at Massachusetts General Hospital in 1937. The practice grew in the ensuing decades into the specialized services that institutions like ours have offered since the 1970s.

The EEG explained

So what, exactly, is the EEG?

Imagine taking two small metallic discs connected by a conducting wire. Place one disc on the scalp and connect the other to a neutral reference, such as the ear. Watch a tiny alternating current flow in the wire, proportional to the electrical activity sensed by the conducting contact. This activity is the EEG, the electrical milieu that bathes brain tissue.

In turn, the EEG arises from the excitable nature of nerve cells, or neurons. When neurons fire, action potentials – brief, high-voltage spikes traveling outward from their cell bodies – set up local electrical activity in other neurons, causing current to flow within and outside them.

These local current flows may cause the targeted neurons to fire in turn and set up yet more current flows. Thus, the system sustains itself. The average overall activity is a mix of many different frequencies, with the five main ones called delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma waves.

If the EEG were just random up-and-down drift – “the bloodless dance of action potentials,” commented a skeptical early 20th century neurologist – it would be much less interesting. The remarkable fact is that EEG tends to spontaneously organize into patterns in time and space.

The spike-wave pattern of petit mal, referenced earlier, is a classic example, but scores of others are now known. Clinical EEG practice is just recognizing characteristic EEG patterns and correlating them to specific disease states.

Fluctuating neurons

Beyond the clinic, an unsettling scientific question emerges. Simply put, how do electrical patterns arise in the brain? How do the billions of neurons and their trillions of local current flows fluctuate in just the right ways to create globally ordered structure?

Our research group has been interested in the fundamental question of pattern formation in EEG. It turns out that activity in the brain is naturally repetitive – that is, oscillatory. This is due to the way neurons are connected and the fact that they interact by excitation and inhibition to produce push-pull effects.

Considering local oscillations as fundamental building blocks, we showed that the EEG over the entire brain could be built up from such elementary blocks. More interestingly, the differing frequencies could be made to coalesce, or synchronize, into a common rhythm. We recognized that synchronization of this type underlies some seizurelike patterns observed in patients.

EEG, AI and the mind

Pattern formation in nature is deeply fascinating. How does a leopard get its spots? How does the audience at a concert spontaneously settle into a rhythmic applause? Many such questions trace their origin to a classic paper on biological pattern published in 1952. Its author was Alan Turing, better known as the father of computer science and early advocate of artificial intelligence, or AI.

The hardware underlying the majority of today’s AI systems are neural networks. Neural networks were introduced in 1943 by Warren McCulloch, a physician and electroencephalographer. Like Berger, McCulloch’s interest in EEG extended beyond brain disease. He wondered where in the brain’s neurons and EEG lay the capacity to think. He conceived the idea of grouping artificial neuronlike computing units into networks, analogous to how real neurons in the brain interconnected.

Together with Walter Pitts, he proved that such neural networks could function as a general-purpose computer. The seminal McCulloch-Pitts ideas were refined over the ensuing decades and reside in the “deep learning” neural networks of today’s AI.

Deep learning AI has infiltrated all areas of biomedicine, including neurology. For example, AI systems can successfully interpret brain scans. AI methods have also been used to analyze EEG.

Can AI systems be trained to deduce thoughts from the EEG? Can AI approach Berger’s quest for telepathy? Incredibly, recent deep-learning AI research has shown that some aspects of mental activity may be decoded from EEG.

In 2024, EEG turns 100. What windows will it open into the brain and mind in the future? Doubtless, clinical applications will grow. Surely, brain pattern generation will be better understood. Perhaps EEG will glimpse the content of the mind. And for neurologists like me surveying the AI revolution, there’s the quiet pride that EEG was really at the start of it all.

Giridhar Kalamangalam, Professor of Neurology, University of Florida

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.



Source link

]]>