A worker inspecting automobile components at a foundry
| Photo Credit: The Hindu
When an auto-component maker announces a ₹2,000-crore order win, investors want to know how much will translate into revenue — and when.
The answer is not always evident from the headline number. Component suppliers often win contracts for a vehicle platform’s life, with volumes ramping up, peaking and then tapering. This is why some companies use lifetime value (LTV) rather than annualised order value.
LTV is the estimated total sales a supplier expects from a vehicle programme over its production life.
Rane (Madras), for instance, shifted from annualised business wins to LTV in the June quarter. In its Q1 FY27 earnings call, the company said it had benchmarked the practice against Indian and global peers and that most programmes run for more than six years. It reported ₹2,040 crore of new business on an LTV basis.
A Rane official told The Hindu that LTV is derived from the expected programme life and estimated OEM volumes when the order is secured. Dividing LTV by programme duration, it said, would not yield a meaningful annual figure because volumes vary over the programme.
Global suppliers use the metric too. Autoliv said in its 2025 annual report that delivery contracts typically cover a vehicle model’s life, generally five to seven years. Its LTV estimates factor in prices and production volumes, while the typical lead time from order intake to start of production is one to three years.
For investors, LTV provides visibility on the long-term business pipeline. But it does not answer the immediate question: when does the revenue arrive?
Consider two programmes: one with an LTV of ₹1,000 crore over 10 years and another of ₹700 crore over three years. The first has the larger LTV, but the second could generate revenue faster.
A Chennai-based chartered accountant with more than 15 years of practice, who reviewed the issue for The Hindu, said LTV indicates the size of a long-term programme but does not provide sufficient near-term revenue visibility by itself.
Investors should ideally see LTV alongside programme duration, start of production (SOP), annualised or peak value and revenue ramp-up, the CA said. Customer-volume assumptions and other conditions also matter.
Can LTV be divided by years?
Rane’s ₹2,040-crore LTV divided by six years gives ₹340 crore a year. But that is only an average, not a revenue forecast. Volumes can be lower during ramp-up, peak in the middle and decline thereafter.
Pratik Kothari of Unique PMS, who raised the issue during Rane’s earnings call, noted that the company had earlier disclosed peak order value and programme duration separately. Investors can still “divide by 6 and get annual/peak value”, he said.
Mr. Kothari does not see the change as an attempt to inflate order wins. “There is no perception building,” he said, adding that there was “nothing sensational about it”.
Rane official said meaningful revenue from orders typically begins 12–24 months after the award, with the full contribution generally coming over the following three to six years, sometimes longer. The company does not provide year-by-year guidance on commercially sensitive parameters because SOPs, ramp-ups and customer platform decisions can change.
No industry-wide template
There is no industry-wide disclosure practice. Some suppliers report LTV, others annual or peak value, while some provide neither.
Suprajit Engineering, for example, has disclosed both, reporting in June 2026 new contracts worth about $12 million annually, with an estimated LTV of $75 million.
Published – October 02, 2026 07:55 pm IST
