us federal court – Artifex.News https://artifex.news Stay Connected. Stay Informed. Sat, 25 Jul 2026 05:15:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2 https://artifex.news/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cropped-cropped-app-logo-32x32.png us federal court – Artifex.News https://artifex.news 32 32 U.S. court rejects Trump administration bid to revive $100,000 H-1B visa fee https://artifex.news/article71265232-ece/ Sat, 25 Jul 2026 05:15:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71265232-ece/ Read More “U.S. court rejects Trump administration bid to revive $100,000 H-1B visa fee” »

]]>

Image for representational purposes only. File
| Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

A U.S. federal appeals court has refused to stay a lower court order striking down the Trump administration’s decision to impose a $100,000 fee on H-1B visas for highly skilled foreign workers.

The three-judge Bench at the Boston-based First Circuit Court of Appeals denied the federal government’s motion to stay U.S. District Judge Leo T Sorokin’s June 8 ruling that struck down the fee, terming it an unlawful tax not authorised by Congress.

“…we deny the defendants’ motion to stay pending appeal to this Court, the district court’s June 8, 2026, Memorandum and Order and accompanying Judgment,” the Bench ruled on Friday (July 24, 2026).

The judges agreed with the plaintiffs — 20 Democrat-ruled States — that “the question here is not whether Congress may delegate the authority in question. It is whether Congress has done so”.

President Donald Trump had issued a proclamation in September last year imposing a $100,000 fee for obtaining new H-1B visas.

The H-1B visa is a non-immigrant visa that allows U.S. companies to employ foreign workers in speciality occupations that require theoretical or technical expertise. American technology companies depend on it to hire tens of thousands of employees each year from countries like India and China.

Citing a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, the appeals court said the executive must show that Congress had spoken “clearly” in conferring discretionary authority to impose financial burdens, whether described as “fees” or “taxes”.

“However, the Trump administration has not explained why that clear standard isn’t required in this case,” the order said.

The court also said the administration had failed to show why the plaintiff states would not suffer substantial injury if the stay was denied.

The defendants “cursorily assert that the plaintiffs would face ‘minimal’ harm without developing that argument — if it does constitute an argument as to the plaintiffs’ lack of substantial injury — further,” the order said.

The U.S. issues 65,000 H-1B visas annually, along with an additional 20,000 visas for foreign workers holding advanced educational qualifications. These visas usually cost between $2,000 and $5,000 in fees.



Source link

]]>
Federal court hears new case against Trump’s latest global tariffs https://artifex.news/article70849022-ece/ Fri, 10 Apr 2026 20:54:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70849022-ece/ Read More “Federal court hears new case against Trump’s latest global tariffs” »

]]>

U.S. President Donald Trump. File
| Photo Credit: Reuters

The centerpiece of U.S. President Donald Trump’s economic policy – sweeping taxes on global imports – is under legal assault again.

The U.S. Court of International Trade, a specialised court in New York, heard oral arguments on Friday (April 10, 2026) in an attempt to overturn the temporary tariffs Mr. Trump turned to after the Supreme Court in February struck down his preferred choice – even bigger, even more sweeping tariffs.

In his first attempt to impose global tariffs, the President last year invoked the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), using the law to declare America’s longstanding trade deficit a national emergency and to impose double-digit worldwide taxes on imports to combat it.



Source link

]]>