On a cloudy September morning, five childhood friends in their late 60s gathered at Nagapattinam port in Tamil Nadu, their laughter cutting through the sea breeze. For over four decades, they had travelled across India together, but that day was different. They were boarding the Nagapattinam-Kankesanthurai ferry between India and Sri Lanka for the first time. When asked the purpose of their visit, retired headmaster, C. Sugumaran, who was part of the group, said with a wide grin, “Just for fun.”

The ferry service had been restarted on October 14, 2023, after a nearly 40-year hiatus. In video messages, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the then Sri Lankan President, Ranil Wickremesinghe, had hailed the diplomatic effort and highlighted the importance of launching the service between the two nations. Calling it a “new chapter in diplomatic and economic ties between India and Sri Lanka,” Modi said that the service would help strengthen cultural, commercial, and civilisational ties between between India and Sri Lanka. Wickremesinghe said the ferry was an important step in improving connectivity.

However, authorities temporarily suspended service after just a week, citing technical issues and rough weather.

On August 16 this year, service was resumed, with support from the External Affairs Ministry. The demand was initially low, forcing the operator to reduce frequency from seven days to three days a week. When interest grew again, the operator, IndSri Ferry Services Private Limited, added a fourth day. In recent weeks, there has been an encouraging rise in occupancy, with an average of 80 passengers per trip. Ticketing agencies said this was due to positive feedback, largely by word-of-mouth.

A ferry ride to another country

The ferry accommodates 165 passengers and crew and includes 27 premium seats. The price of a ticket is ₹5,000 for economy and ₹7,500 for premium. Passengers are allowed 23 kilogrammes of luggage for free. They can carry up to 50 kg of luggage by paying ₹50 for every additional kg. The ferry leaves Nagapattinam at 8 a.m. and reaches Kankesanthurai at noon. It leaves Sri Lanka at 2 p.m. and returns to India by 6 p.m.

The captain of the passenger ferry, Sivagangai, was J. Baskar. He explained that the vessel would operate at 18 knots with strict anti-smuggling protocols and would be monitored by authorities from both nations throughout the journey.

“Both sides can inspect the vessel at any time. It is mandatory for us to provide information on all aspects of the journey, including passenger numbers and nationalities, for transparency and security,” Baskar said. He added that the ferry was equipped with life jackets, life rafts, and a rescue boat.

A group of five families in the ferry was excited to explore Sri Lanka’s cultural and historical ties with India. They aimed to visit places connected to the Hindu epic, the Ramayana.

S. Shanthi, who was travelling with her husband and son, was delighted. “We are going to see the land where Sita (from the Ramayana) was imprisoned,” she said.

The same day, R. Sugitha, a librarian from Jaffna in the Northern Province of Sri Lanka, used the ferry service to travel to Tamil Nadu. She said it offered a more affordable alternative to flying. “Travelling by air costs 60,000-70,000 Sri Lankan rupees (₹12,000-16,000), but the ferry is only 31,000 rupees (₹8,600) to go across the Palk Strait and come back,” she said.

During the journey, Sugitha and her fellow passengers formed a WhatsApp group called ‘Ship Friends’. They promised to stay in touch after the journey ended.

Reflecting on her return from Sri Lanka, Shanthi said, “We visited temples and saw remnants of the war. But what stood out was the warmth of the local Tamils who treated us not as visitors, but as family.”

While the passengers enjoyed the ride, they also had suggestions for improvement. “While most of the trips are smooth, rough seas can occasionally cause bumpy rides. A larger ferry could provide a more comfortable experience in such conditions,” noted a senior crew member.

Prabhakaran V., an environmental activist from Chennai, who was travelling with his wife, Akshaya, said that the couple had originally planned to go to Sri Lanka for their honeymoon, but the delay in resuming the service had forced them to delay their visit.

“There could be more food options,” Prabhakaran complained, referring to the packets of instant noodles and ready-to-eat food that were available for purchase in the ferry. “They could also offer better amenities at the ports, a smoother connection to Jaffna, and a help desk for the elderly at the Kankesanthurai terminal.” Jaffna is located 21 kilometres from the port. As buses are rare, auto rickshaws are the only mode of transport to the capital city of the Northern Province.

Many traders said that while the service is useful, the baggage allowance could be increased to at least 100 kg per passenger. F.A. Rohan, a trader from Colombo, imports ready-made garments from Tamil Nadu using the ferry service. Despite the relatively low fares for the ferry, Rohan said that the margins in his trade are thin, and he would have to save as much on travel costs. “More baggage allowance would help,” he said.

Rohan also felt that the immigration process in India was time-consuming and the officers unfriendly.

Historical connections

The links between India and Sri Lanka are historical. Writer and publisher K. Sachithananthan noted that the Tamil text, Chola Mandala Sathagam, refers to a famine in Jaffna in the 13th century. “Sadayappa Vallal, the patron who supported Kambar in writing the Tamil epic Kambaramayanam, is said to have sent a thousand boats of rice to the king of Nallur in Jaffna,” he said.

Sachithananthan highlighted the flourishing tobacco trade via the Kankesanthurai port, which thrived until the 1950s, especially with Kerala. The Jaffna Malayalam Tobacco Exporters Association played a key role in this trade, he added.

R. Kulasingam, a Tamil writer from Paruthithurai in Jaffna, explained the significance of the ports of the Northern Province, such as Kankesanthurai, Oorkavalthurai, Paruthithurai, and Valvettithurai. His grandfather, a ‘Thangayal’ (sailor) on the Paruthithurai-Nagapattinam route, witnessed the region’s prosperity, he recalled. However, former Sri Lankan Prime Minister S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike’s nationalisation efforts led to the shutdown of many operations, he said.

Highlighting the region’s shipbuilding history, B. Meenakshi Sundaram, son of a shipbuilder from Valvettithurai in Jaffna, spoke of the prominence of these areas in producing skilled sailors. His father built the ship, Parvatha Pathini, during British rule, which was later sold to Pakistan. Though smuggling increased after the ports ceased functioning, Sundaram said many sailors from these areas continue to work globally, keeping the legacy of their craftsmanship alive.

The British, too, established formal transport links between India and Sri Lanka. In the late 1880s, the Boat Mail Express connected Talaimannar and Rameswaram through a collaboration between the Sri Lankan and Indian Railways, allowing for seamless travel and the movement of goods. Under British colonial rule, Indian Tamils, known as ‘hill country Tamils’, were brought to Sri Lanka to work in plantations and built much of the island nation’s early infrastructure. The ferry service was operational until 1964, when a cyclone wiped out Dhanushkodi on the southern tip of Pamban island in Tamil Nadu, shifting the route to Rameswaram. The service continued until the Sri Lankan civil war in 1983 forced its suspension. In 2011, an attempt was made to revive the Thoothukudi-Colombo ferry service, but it was short-lived.

S. Rathinamani Ammal, 88, from Matale in the Central Province of Sri Lanka, fondly recollected over a phone call her journey on the ferry in 1965, from Talaimannar on the northwestern coast of Mannar Island to Rameswaram in the Ramanathapuram district of Tamil Nadu. She spent 10 days at her ancestral home in Karaikudi and visited temples in Srirangam and Madurai.

“If the rice cooked at home in Matale was packed in leaves, it would still be hot when we landed in Rameswaram,” she said. Ammal said that her family would often travel to India to manage their land and pray at temples.

Since then, there have been many efforts to resume the ferry service across the Palk Strait. S. Niranjan Nanthagopan, managing director of IndSri Ferry Services, who has long championed stronger India-Sri Lanka ties, was among those leading the initiative. During colonial rule, Nanthagopan’s ancestors operated ships between Jaffna and Vedaranyam town in Nagapattinam district, transporting passengers and goods.

According to him, tourism can reconnect the Tamils on both sides of the Palk Strait and open up new opportunities. “Connectivity is the first priority,” Nanthagopan said. “Once that is established, other aspirations can follow.”

Economic and strategic ties

Highlighting the need for stronger connectivity between India and Sri Lanka, Sai Murali S., the Consul General of India in Jaffna, explained that the Indian government has been covering part of the costs of the ferry service. “The aim is to lower user costs and strengthen bilateral ties,” he said.

The Sri Lankan government plans to expand the Jaffna International Airport and introduce new routes to Tamil Nadu and diaspora hubs. Sai Murali said that the Indian government would also bear part of the costs of the expansion of the airport. Thanks to the success of the Chennai-Jaffna route by air, there are now IndiGo flights between India and Sri Lanka every day.

“India will also be managing renovation costs at Kankesanthurai port; work is set to begin this year,” he said. “Prime Minister Modi’s vision includes restoring the Talaimannar-Rameswaram route too. There are feasibility studies under way to reconstruct the ancient land bridge between Dhanushkodi and Talaimannar, with India covering most of the cost.” Sai Murali added that discussions are also ongoing with more ferry operators to pitch in and also to improve the quality of service between Kankesanthurai and Nagapattinam. Passenger feedback is expected to help the authorities resolve issues.

K.D.S. Ruwanchandra, Secretary of Sri Lanka’s Ministry of Ports, Shipping, and Aviation, acknowledged India’s vital role in enhancing connectivity. A bilateral committee oversees ferry operations, though challenges remain, especially in securing vessels with cargo capacity.

“We have implemented security measures at Kankesanthurai port. Customs and immigration officers are working alongside Sri Lanka’s Ports Authority security and Naval officers,” Ruwanchandra said, stressing the importance of preventing illegal activities.

A boon for the Tamil community

Sri Lankan Tamil refugees in India said they prefer the ferry over flights as it has a larger cargo capacity. R. Manikandan, 25, was born in the Devakottai special camp in Sivagangai district in Tamil Nadu as a refugee. He recently returned to Sri Lanka by the ferry and obtained citizenship for the first time in his life. “I felt a deep connection. Everything seemed so near, both physically and emotionally,” he said.

The ferry service has been hailed as a boon for the Tamil community. M. Piiratheepan, an Acting District Government Agent in Jaffna, highlighted the deep cultural and spiritual ties between India and Sri Lanka. He emphasised plans to create a tourist-friendly environment with proper facilities, including information centres and support for hotels and guides.

R. Jeyasekaran, President of the Jaffna Chamber of Commerce, stressed the need for improving the ferry service and introducing cargo services. “India could supply 75% of our daily needs, which would reduce our reliance on China,” he said. Jeyasekaran explained that a 500-tonne cargo ship could lower costs, expand Jaffna’s market, and reduce dependence on Colombo.

S. Narasimman from the India-ASEAN-Sri Lanka Chamber of Commerce and Industry, added, “We are very watchful of the ferry development. While the current patronage appears to be low, the introduction of a cargo service in the near future could certainly capture our attention.”

Scepticism and concern

However, fisherfolk on both sides were sceptical that relations would improve through the ferry service. Cautiously hopeful about future relations between the Tamil fishermen of Sri Lanka and Tamil Nadu, N.V. Subamaniyam, former president of the Northern Province Fisher People’s Unity, highlighted the impact that India’s bottom trawlers had on Sri Lankan fishermen. “They cut our nets and take away our livelihoods,” he said.

Subamaniyam recalled the time when the fisherfolk from both sides would share food and enjoy camaraderie at sea. “They would watch Tamil movies like Pattikaattu Ponnaiya and Thanga Padhakkam in Rameswaram during the 1970s,” he said. “But those days are long gone.”

R.M.P. Rajendra Nattar, President of the Indian National Fishermen Union, echoed these concerns. “We face attacks from the Sri Lankan Navy and our government remains silent when our boats are seized,” he said. Despite the challenges, Nattar stressed that Indian fishermen bear no ill will towards Sri Lankan fishermen, as many of them continue to struggle post-war.

Ahilan Kadirgamar, senior lecturer at the University of Jaffna in Sri Lanka, welcomed the renewed connectivity, but emphasised that it is only part of a more complex picture. While Tamil Nadu’s economy has flourished, Jaffna remains largely rural, he noted. “Will Jaffna truly benefit from this economic relationship or merely become a market for Indian goods, which will undermine local production?” he said.

Kadirgamar was also worried about how tourism would impact the fragility of the region, and the potential over-reliance on India. “The Northern Province is now viewed through New Delhi’s strategic lens,” he said. “The India-Sri Lanka relationship is increasingly centred on security and geopolitics rather than cultural ties.”

nacchinarkkiniyan.m@thehindu.co.in

A recent investigation has revealed that Australian tourists were being tricked into eating dog meat skewers during their holidays on an Indonesian island. On Thursday, Bali officials seized hundreds of kilograms of raw dog meat and numerous skewers from vendors, despite a comprehensive ban on the trade of such meat on the popular resort island, the Independent reported. 

According to AFP, public order officers in Bali’s Jembrana district seized at least 500 dog meat skewers and 56 kilograms of raw dog meat from various sellers following a series of inspections. Dewa Nyoman Rai Dharmadi, head of the Bali Public Order Agency, said that inspections conducted this week found three vendors still peddling dog meat, defying local regulations that prohibit its sale.

Two of the vendors had previously received warnings from Bali Police regarding their engagement in the trade of dog meat. 

“We won’t suddenly take legal action, but we are giving them the chance to know the ban and why it was banned. But we will process recurrent (sellers) for deterrent effect. We’re not playing around,” Mr Dharmadi said. 

”Dog meat is not food and can also potentially cause disease. Don’t believe in the superstitions that dog meat is healthy. That’s misleading,” he added. 

Two of the vendors are reportedly set to attend court in August.

Notably, Bali has enacted a stringent ban on the dog meat trade, imposing severe penalties on offenders, including a maximum prison sentence of three months and a hefty fine of up to 50 million rupiah (approximately 2,300 pounds), serving as a strong deterrent to those who would engage in this illicit activity.

Unlike regulated agricultural practices, the dog meat trade often relies on the inhumane seizure of dogs that are not raised for food, including stolen pets, community-owned dogs, and street dogs. 

Animal welfare organizations, including Animals International, have condemned the sale and consumption of dog and cat meat, citing the inherent cruelty of the trade. They argue that the dog meat trade not only subjects dogs to immense suffering but also poses serious health and safety risks to both tourists and local communities. 

However, dog meat is considered a part of traditional cuisine and consumed in certain regions of Southeast and East Asia, including China, Vietnam, and North Korea. 
 

In consequence of their “bad behaviour” around the pandas, a dozen tourists have been permanently banned from China’s Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, according to CNN.

A statement posted on the research base’s official WeChat account said that 12 people, ages 26 to 61, have been given lifetime bans. Their offences included spitting into the pandas’ outdoor play area on two consecutive occasions and throwing bread, eggs, lollipop sticks, cigarettes, and bamboo shoots.

Fortunately, the pandas were unharmed by their wicked activity, and the WeChat post confirmed their continued excellent health and happiness.

According to CNN, The Research Base has not publicly identified any of the banned guests or their nationalities. The WeChat post explained that the tourists were not all together; the offences took place between April and June of this year.

The base, which is one of the most popular tourist attractions in Chengdu, has detailed visitor instructions on its website.

“Please be mindful of your own and animals’ safety,” reads one note. “Stay quiet and keep clear of animals; littering, spitting, throwing food into the animal activity field, and other behaviours threatening animals’ safety are prohibited.”

Violators of the rules face penalties including criticism and education, one-year bans, five-year bans, or lifetime bans from entering the park. The severity of the penalty depends on the degree of the violation.

The Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding was established in 1987 in Sichuan, China, with the goal of restoring the native giant pandas’ natural habitat while serving as a top-notch research institution, conservation education hub, and international tourist destination.

Five tourists on a Ryanair flight from England to Spain were escorted off by the police when it landed in Tenerife because of their inappropriate and disruptive behaviour. A report in express.co.uk said that the incident took place on May 16 on flight number FR4346. The three males and two female passengers caused nightmare for other fellow passengers who complained to the crew. The outlet further said that the five tourists were not sitting together but sitting close to each other on the plane.

The male passengers allegedly started creating issues shortly after the plane took off by opening a duty-free liquor bottle and drinking straight from it.

As per accounts given by other passengers, the crew members warned the group but it didn’t have any effect, the express.co.uk report said.

The group kept sharing the drinks and misbehaving with fellow passengers. Some passengers claimed they engaged in inappropriate sexual behaviour despite the presence of children on the plane.

Finally, the pilot had to intervene, telling the unruly passengers that they risk grounding the flight and getting evicted from the plane.

When the flight landed at its destination, the pilot called the Spanish police and the cops arrived to meet the rowdy passengers.

The police took their passports and told them they won’t be able to travel back to England on a Ryanair flight.

The group was taken away by the police for questioning, the outlet further said.

In a statement, Ryanair said, “The crew of this flight from Liverpool to Tenerife (16 May) called ahead for police assistance after a small number of passengers became disruptive onboard. The aircraft was met by local police upon arrival at Tenerife and these passengers were removed. This is now a matter for local police.”

Tourists visiting Lanzarote and Fuerteventura in the Canary Islands are being warned against taking sand, stones, and rocks from beaches. Doing so can result in hefty fines ranging from 128 pounds (Rs 13478) to 2,563 pounds (Rs 2,69879), The New York Post.

This seemingly harmless tradition of collecting souvenirs is having a detrimental impact on the islands’ ecosystems. Authorities report that Lanzarote loses roughly a tonnes of volcanic material from its beaches each year, while Fuerteventura’s famous “Popcorn Beach” loses a staggering tonnene of sand every month, reported the news portal.

Removing this material disrupts the natural balance of the shorelines and puts them at risk. Tourists caught taking the popcorn-shaped pebbles face fines between 128 and 512 pounds, while those taking larger amounts could be hit with the maximum penalty.

This crackdown comes amid concerns about the Canary Islands reaching a tipping point due to mass tourism. Tenerife recently declared a water emergency due to severe drought conditions, with some officials blaming tourist consumption for straining resources. One hotel was found to be using four times more water per guest than a local resident.

With a resident population of under a million compared to over 5 million tourists last year, experts fear a “systemic collapse” if pressure on resources continues. Tenerife has already banned using drinking water in gardens and pools in response to the drought.

The authorities face a challenge as most of the seized material at Lanzarote and Fuerteventura Airports cannot lead to offenders being punished. This is due to the difficulty in proving whether rocks, stones, or sand have been removed from protected areas or not.

The Canary Islands consist of seven main islands: Tenerife, Gran Canaria, Lanzarote, Fuerteventura, La Palma, La Gomera, and El Hierro. Each island has its own distinct character and attractions. Tenerife is the largest island and home to Mount Teide, the highest mountain in Spain.