Strait of Hormuz shipping – Artifex.News https://artifex.news Stay Connected. Stay Informed. Tue, 01 Sep 2026 17:29:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3 https://artifex.news/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cropped-cropped-app-logo-32x32.png Strait of Hormuz shipping – Artifex.News https://artifex.news 32 32 U.S. strikes Iran after ‘attempted attacks on shipping’; four projectiles hit areas east of Strait of Hormuz, state media says https://artifex.news/article71416842-ece/ Tue, 01 Sep 2026 17:29:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71416842-ece/ Read More “U.S. strikes Iran after ‘attempted attacks on shipping’; four projectiles hit areas east of Strait of Hormuz, state media says” »

]]>

File photo for representational purposes only.
| Photo Credit: Reuters

U.S. forces launched strikes on Tuesday (September 1, 2026) against Iran’s Revolutionary Guards in response to attempted attacks on commercial shipping and American forces, the U.S. military said as hostilities flare again after a month without military action.

U.S. Central Command said the strikes “follow recent attempted attacks by the IRGC against commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and against American service members deployed to the region.”

Iranian state media said four projectiles hit parts of the southeastern Sistan-Baluchistan province, east of the Strait of Hormuz, while multiple explosions were heard in the east of Bandar Abbas and around Qeshm Island.

“No incidents or damage have been reported” so far in the southern Hormozgan Province, the state media reported.

On Sunday (August 30, 2026), the U.S. military said it struck rocket launchers on Larak Island in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran responded by launching missiles at U.S. sites in Jordan, which were intercepted, while United Arab Emirates said it stopped an Iranian drone over its waters.

President Donald Trump acknowledged on Monday (August 31, 2026) that more strikes might be necessary.

Mr. Trump asserted that the U.S. and Israeli bombardment has left Iran “a failed nation.” He said that much of its political leadership has been killed, Iran’s economy is staggered by surging inflation and its military devastated.

Still, Mr. Trump acknowledged that more strikes might be necessary. “That doesn’t mean we won’t smack them,” he told reporters. “We’ll see what happens.”

The U.S. and Iran have been engaged in an intermittent war for more than six months, with the recent lull in fighting lasting a month. A return to open conflict would be dangerous for the region, where Iran has targeted U.S. military bases and infrastructure in Gulf countries since the war began.

Iranian state TV reported the sound of explosions in the southern port city of Bandar Abbas but did not provide details.

Renewed fighting

The renewed fighting also comes after Mr. Trump appeared to pivot last month toward punishing Iran economically with sanctions, with the president promising an “economic D-Day” against a country that has withstood nearly five decades of punishing American sanctions.

The Trump administration argued that it was only a matter of time and that striking the right economic target would get Tehran to its breaking point. But at the same time, U.S. stockpiles of advanced weapons have been diminishing, while the war has been unpopular among Americans and could make Republicans vulnerable in November’s midterm elections.

The U.S. military has tried to cast the renewed fighting as limited. Central Command said in a statement on X on Monday (August 31, 2026) that its attacks on Iranian targets on Sunday (August 30, 2026) were narrowly focused on preventing IRGC forces from placing new mines in the Strait of Hormuz.

“U.S. forces took limited, precise action against IRGC minelaying forces posing an imminent threat in the Strait of Hormuz,” Central Command stated. “In essence, Iran created the threat and the U.S. military eliminated it to protect civilian mariners, commercial shipping, and the free flow of global commerce.”

Central Command reiterated on Tuesday (September 1, 2026) that its attacks only followed Iranian aggression against commercial vessels and American troops in the region.

With AP, AFP inputs



Source link

]]>
Gulf ship traffic via the Strait of Hormuz hovers below 10-day average, data shows https://artifex.news/article71391591-ece/ Wed, 26 Aug 2026 06:04:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71391591-ece/ Read More “Gulf ship traffic via the Strait of Hormuz hovers below 10-day average, data shows” »

]]>

A woman walks as vessels in the Strait of Hormuz are visible near the beach of Bandar Abbas, Iran. File
| Photo Credit: Reuters

Five commodity ‌vessels transited the Strait of Hormuz on ​Tuesday (August 25, 2026), little changed from a day ⁠earlier but well below the 10-day average of 15, preliminary shipping data showed on Wednesday (August 26)

Two tankers ‌carrying liquefied petroleum gas and one tanker carrying bitumen exited the Gulf ‌via the Strait, while two empty product ‌tankers ⁠entered the waterway from the ⁠Gulf of Oman, initial data from shiptracker Kpler showed at 0408 GMT. On Monday (August 24), four commodity vessels transited the ​waterway, the data showed.

The ‌figures could change as some ships typically switch off their location transponders during the voyage.

Transits through the Bab el-Mandeb, another ‌major maritime chokepoint in West Asia, ​were also roughly little changed at 31 commodity vessels versus 29 the ⁠day before, Kpler data showed, but in line with the 10-day average.

Iran said it had ‌resumed discussions with Oman on managing the Strait of Hormuz amid increased economic pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump.

The two sides said on Tuesday (August 25) they had explored creating a temporary joint shipping corridor and ‌agreed to remove mines from the waterway.

“Any agreement between ​these two parties does not mean we will see normalisation in oil flows ⁠through the key chokepoint,” ING Economics said in ⁠a note.

“We would likely need to see the U.S. lift its ‌blockade on Iranian ports and ease sanctions on Iran before we see any move towards ​normalisation.” the note added.



Source link

]]>