COLOMBO

Militarisation of Sri Lanka’s Tamil-majority north and east persists 17 years after the end of the civil war, despite many state assurances to reduce the military footprint in the former conflict zone, the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka has said.

In a recent report titled ‘The Human Rights Situation of the Northern and Eastern Provinces of Sri Lanka’, the Commission pointed to a “sustained pattern of land appropriation, denial of access to traditional livelihoods, and intimidation of local populations” by the military in the districts across the region.

“Seventeen years after the end of the armed conflict, militarisation remains a persistent feature of governance and land use in the Northern and Eastern Provinces,” the report said, pointing to “repeated assurances” by the state to reduce its military footprint and return occupied lands to their rightful owners.

Also read: Ground Zero| Sri Lanka civil war: 17 years later, the imprints remain

The Human Rights Commission urged the government to expedite the return of military-occupied lands to the people and ensure full restoration of property rights and livelihoods. Further, it emphasised that the government refrain from invoking national security “as a blanket justification for land acquisition”, particularly where such actions disproportionately affect minority communities or facilitate religious encroachment, and “take concrete steps” to withdraw military involvement from civilian economic sectors, especially agriculture and education.

Militarisation is one of the prominent post-war concerns highlighted in the Commission’s report, which looks at wide-ranging issues such as enforced disappearances, mass graves, memorialisation, state surveillance and intimidation, land contestations, resettlement of northern Muslims expelled by the LTTE in 1990, freedom of religion, development projects, and livelihoods.

Residents of the north and east have consistently cited military presence and engagement as an impediment to post-war reconciliation and economic revival. Families — many of whom were displaced during the decades of strife and returned to these areas after the war ended — have been demanding the return of lands, where their homes once stood, or they once farmed.

Return of people’s lands was among the chief promises made by President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to the Tamil people, ahead of the November 2024 general elections. His National People’s Power emerged winner in all but one of the five electoral districts in the north and east.

In August this year President Dissanayake, who is also the Minister of Defence, instructed the security forces to expedite the release and return of land taken over during the war and no longer required for security purposes. However, despite his directives to the military, Tamil-speaking people living in the north and east are concerned about the slow pace of action.

When contacted, Ministry spokesman Brigadier Franklin Joseph claimed “over 90 %” of the lands held previously held by the military have been returned to the people. “There are many cases where the owners are not known or there is no proof confirming their ownership. Those are being looked into,” he told The Hindu.

Watch: 15 years on, justice and economic progress elude Sri Lanka’s Tamils

However, Thurairasa Ravikaran, MP from the opposition Ilankai Tamil Arasu Kadchi (ITAK) representing the northern Mullaitivu district, contended that it was unfair to expect families who fled the district at the height of the war to produce documents. “Our people ran for their lives… in that sort of life and death situation, you cannot expect them to carry all their documents in files,” he told The Hindu.

“I can tell you that huge swathes of people’s land remain under military control even today. Not just the military, but also other state agencies like the Archelogy and Wildlife departments have been resorting to blatant land grabs. That is our reality,” he said, highlighting an enduring struggle for people of Mullaitivu, the district that witnessed the gory, final battle between the armed forces and the LTTE. It was also where the army is accused of killing tens and thousands of civilians, including in areas declared no fire zones. The military and successive governments in Colombo have denied the allegations.

The slippery slope to the Kurunthurmalai hilltop

“When I say military, it is the army, navy, air force, civil defence force, all of them who control land,” added the legislator, who has for many years been part of people’s struggles and agitations demanding land.

Also read: A poverty of hope among Sri Lankan Tamils

The Human Rights Commission’s report, which also highlighted how militarisation impacted people’s livelihoods, pointed to military involvement in economic activities, such as agriculture and pre-school teaching, predominantly executed through the Civil Security Department.

Military officials are “directly involved in the administration of teachers in pre-schools,” it noted. In Mullaitivu district, it is not uncommon to see armed military men in uniform, running shops or manning traffic at junctions.

Observing that Sri Lanka “currently lacks a comprehensive national security sector reform plan” that includes strategies to reduce military presence in the North and East and restore civilian administration in the region, the Commission noted that “continued presence of the military in multiple aspects of civilian life, including economic activities, singles this region out from the rest of the country and inhibits progress on post-war reconciliation.”

Published – October 17, 2026 01:53 pm IST

File photo of former Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa.
| Photo Credit: AP

Sri Lanka’s President Anura Kumara Dissanayake. File
| Photo Credit: Reuters

The Iranian Embassy in Sri Lanka said it has no details on the matter. Representative image
| Photo Credit: Reuters

Sri Lankan former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, left, waves as he walks with his wife Shiranthi Rajapaksa.
| Photo Credit: AP

Nilakshika de Silva of Sri Lanka. File
| Photo Credit: ICC via Getty Images

File image of Namal Rajapaksa (C), son of former Sri Lankan president Mahinda Rajapaksa
| Photo Credit: AFP

How often does a draw feel like a defeat? And a stalemate assume the hue of a victory? Often enough, Shubman Gill will insist.

Despite their own uneasy recent dalliance with the five-day format, India would have fancied their chances of bearding the Sri Lankan lion in its own den in a two-Test series that is pretty much the norm when the world’s most sought-after side isn’t playing against Australia or England.

India hadn’t lost a series in this country since 2008 and arrived early this month sitting on a five-Test winning streak on Sri Lankan soil. Even though their last visit was in 2017, they had reason to believe the hosts were ripe for the taking.

Significant result

The script seemed to be holding true. Notwithstanding pockets of defiance from their young guns, led by the exceptional Sonal Dinusha, Sri Lanka slumped to a 185-run rout in Galle in the first Test. The result assumed a more significant hue because India were without two-fifths of their first-choice bowling attack — Jasprit Bumrah and Washington Sundar were missing through injuries — but still won a rain-hit encounter with quite a bit to spare.

There was excellent reason, therefore, to aspire for a 2-0 sweep ahead of the second Test at the SSC ground. Sri Lanka, already without Pathum Nissanka and Kusal Mendis, were dealt another unkind cut when Dinesh Chandimal was ruled out of the second Test after hurting his neck while fielding in Galle. But as it turned out, his replacement, Pasindu Sooriyabandara, had a great game at the SSC, desperately unlucky to miss out of centuries in both innings.

Dinusha delights

Dinusha, however, ensured that a similar fate didn’t befall him. Ahead of this series, the 25-year-old left-hander had played just three Tests but had showcased his ability and his temperament, not least in the Caribbean in June-July when he reeled off a sequence of 43, 12 not out, 92 and 28 in the two Tests.

It should have been fair warning well heeded; it will be presumptuous to say that India didn’t pay much attention to the young man, but they didn’t crack the Dinusha puzzle throughout the series, which is one of the main reasons they had to settle for a 1-0 scoreline despite dominating the second Test too for large stretches.

Dinusha batted for a little less than 20 hours in making 420 runs from 722 deliveries, the single point of difference as the Lankans ground out a fabulous draw after being forced to follow on in the second Test.

It wasn’t all doom and gloom from an Indian point of view. Devdutt Padikkal grabbed his chances with both hands in his first Tests in more than 20 months. In the absence of Sai Sudharsan, he took giant strides towards making the No. 3 slot his own with hundreds in the first innings of both games.

The volume of runs was impressive, but so was his presence in the middle. In further signs of his evolution as a dependable, oftentimes aggressive all-format batter, he treated the bowling with just about the respect it deserved, using the offside as his preferred area of scoring and looking equally comfortable against pace and spin.

India will find it very hard to look beyond him for the one-drop position when they play two Tests in New Zealand in November. After all, how can you overlook the credentials of someone as consistent as the Karnataka left-hander was in Sri Lanka?

And then, there was Dhruv Jurel, justifying the faith of the Gautam Gambhir-led think-tank which was sure that the wicketkeeper-batter was the answer to their prayers for a dependable middle-order batter who could play spin with soft hands, deftness of feet and no gremlins of self-doubt.

Assured batting

Alongside Sai Sudharsan and Padikkal, Jurel was one of the three batters Gambhir was keen should be a part of the India ‘A’ side that arrived on these shores for a shadow tour towards the end of June. Admittedly, neither Galle nor the SSC was a rank turner like Kolkata had been against South Africa in November, but Jurel didn’t put a foot wrong either in front of the stumps — he had a half-century in the first Test which he topped with his second ton in the next — or behind it when Rishabh Pant sat out much of the Sri Lankan first innings in Colombo with an assortment of blows to his body.

K.L. Rahul was dependable without going big while Pant was, well, Pant — exhilarating, unpredictable, entertaining and compelling. Maybe Gill will be a little disappointed that he didn’t join the list of centurions, but his batting looked in decent order, as did Yashasvi Jaiswal’s even if he found novel ways of courting dismissals.

Then, there was Prasidh Krishna. Ahead of the series, Gill was asked if he had a difficult choice to make between the Karnataka pacer and the uncapped Gurnoor Brar as Mohammed Siraj’s new-ball partner. The skipper barely batted an eyelid when he said that Prasidh was bowling the best with the red ball that he had ever seen him, and the strapping quick didn’t disappoint.

Even on the placid decks on offer, he worked up good pace, extracted appreciable bounce and kept the batters honest. When he pitched the ball up, there was movement which, allied with pace in the region of 140 kmph, made him a tricky proposition.

Up for the challenge

Prasidh was up for any challenge, including doing the dirty job of trying to soften up the batters with his shortish length, and is shaping up into an excellent support act for Bumrah and Siraj. India will need their pacers to fire on all cylinders when they go to New Zealand, so from that perspective, the development of Prasidh is perhaps the single greatest takeaway for the decision-making group from this three-week sojourn to the Emerald Isle.

But there are worrying signs aplenty too, not least when it comes to back-up spin options. Despite starting his Test career with so much promise in New Chandigarh when he took six wickets in the first innings against Afghanistan, and despite his ten-wicket match haul in Galle, Manav Suthar is still very much a work in progress.

In Colombo, his craft had to play second fiddle to the slowness of the SSC strip; there was bounce aplenty, which took bowled and leg before out of the equation, but the left-arm spinner was slow to respond when the Sri Lankan batters resorted to the sweep and the reverse sweep.

It might appear a touch harsh on someone who was only playing in his third Test, but this is an early education for Suthar and he will do well to heed the lessons if he aspires to step into the shoes of Ravindra Jadeja going forward and become the lead bowler around whom the Indian spin attack will revolve in the future.

Debut to forget

While Suthar did show signs of promise, Saransh Jain had a disappointing debut — and there is no way to sugarcoat that. On the radar of those involved in talent-identification and selection matters for a while now, Jain is an experienced hand at 33, with more than 50 first-class appearances under his belt for various outfits.

His first delivery in Test cricket was a no-ball, which can perhaps be put down to nerves, but he bowled six more of them across the two innings, which couldn’t have pleased anyone, least of all new spin bowling coach Sairaj Bahutule. But it wasn’t just the no-balls that were grating. While he did show reasonable control, the threat quotient was barely perceptible.

Saransh wouldn’t have been here if Washington was available but as a fallback alternative, he has a long way to go. In some ways, it points to a slight thinning of resources in the spin cupboard, which ought to worry those in the corridors of power because for so long now, India have got used to having the now-retired R. Ashwin and Jadeja to spin their webs of deception and lure batters to their doom.

After a lull, India have plenty of fast-bowling options to summon despite Mukesh Kumar and Akash Deep and Harshit Rana and Nitish Kumar Reddy spending a lot of time in the infirmary. But for the traditional land of spin to struggle to unearth an incisive off-spinner is a little hard to fathom and harder still to digest.

Jain deserves the benefit of doubt — after all, this was Test No. 1 and maybe he did have the proverbial ordinary one-off game — but for him to set himself up as a semi-long-term option, there must be obvious signs of improvement.

This tour in general, and the second Test particularly, was a steep learning curve for the captain. It’s been a little over 14 months since Gill first led the Test team, in England in Leeds last June. Captaincy looks simple from the outside but entails plenty of decision-making on the fly, even in Test cricket, without second-guessing oneself.

He was handicapped by a rapidly softening ball in Galle and by an SSC surface that had bounce but hardly any pace. Some of the fields he employed were strange, there was a definite occasional slant towards passivity, and the move to almost ignore trying to get Dinusha out on the final day of the series and target the other end was little short of self-defeating.

Mixed run

Gill has had a mixed run as captain — 2-2 in England, 2-0 at home against West Indies, defeat in his only Test against South Africa in Kolkata when he faced a mere three deliveries before contracting a neck injury, a hammering of Afghanistan and now this 1-0 success in Sri Lanka, his first overseas victory as skipper.

The journey has been challenging and exciting, but daunting outings lie in store in the red-ball version before he starts to focus exclusively on the 50-over format ahead of the World Cup in southern Africa in the second half of next year.

India haven’t won a Test in New Zealand since 2009 when Mahendra Singh Dhoni led them to a famous series triumph, and their last visit in 2020 was an unmitigated disaster as they were soundly beaten in both matches.

New Zealand will test the technique and the character of the batting group with its seam-friendly conditions, after which Australia will come calling for five Tests in India. Gill must be on top of his game — as lead batter and as leader — and towards that end, Sri Lanka was a timely, useful wake-up call.

Indian javelin ace Neeraj Chopra produced his best performance in more than a year but was pipped to the post by the rising Sri Lankan star Rumesh Pathirage for the top spot by a mere nine centimetres in the Lausanne Diamond League meet in Lausanne on Friday (August 21, 2026).

The 28-year-old Chopra’s 88.05m throw in the second round, which fetched him the second spot in the nine-man star-studded field, was his best after the 88.16m he recorded while winning the Paris Diamond League in June 2025. It was also his season’s best throw.

However, the 23-year-old Pathirage continued his juggernaut this season as he overtook Chopra with his third-round throw of 88.14m.

Grenada’s Anderson Peters was third with his sixth and final round effort of 86.69m.

Reigning world champion Keshorn Walcott of Trinidad and Tobago was fourth with a best throw of 83.71m.

World Championships bronze winner Curtis Thompson of the USA was sixth with a below-par 78.13m, while Tokyo Olympics silver winner Jakub Vadlejch of the Czech Republic took the seventh spot with 77.32m.

Chopra later said it was a close tussle between him and Pathirage for the top spot.

“I didn’t realise it was only nine centimetres, it was really close, but I’m happy with the 88-metre throw. To be honest, it didn’t feel like it went 88m because I felt very relaxed. I tried really hard and later focused on my technique,” he said.

“With every competition, I feel that I’m coming back. The crowds in Lausanne and Zurich understand athletics and really support you, so it’s always good to compete here.” With his second-place finish, Chopra also jumped to top five in the season-ending Diamond League Finals standings from his earlier seventh spot.

For jumps and throws, the top six in the standings will compete in the September 4-5 DL Finals in Brussels. One additional athlete per discipline may also compete via a national or global wildcard selection.

Pathirage and Peters have already qualified for the DL Finals after accumulating 23 and 22 points, respectively. There is another DL meet which has a men’s javelin throw event in it — in Zurich on August 27.

Chopra had won the DL Finals title in 2022 and finished second in 2023, 2024 and 2025.

The showdown between the two South Asian rivals lived up to the expectations, as Chopra sent his spear to 88.05m in his second attempt to overtake Pathirage and occupy the top spot briefly. The Sri Lanka responded soon after with his 88.14m effort in the third third to retake the spot.

This was the third time in a row that the 23-year-old Pathirage had beaten two-time Olympic medallist Chopra this year. He had earlier beaten the Indian superstar in the Doha Diamond League and then in the recent Glasgow Commonwealth Games. Pathirage had won in both the events, while Chopra had finished fourth and second, respectively.

Chopra began with 83.54m before coming up with a big throw of 88.05m. It was his season’s best after his 85.83m while winning silver in the Glasgow Commonwealth Games. His third attempt measured 83.72m before recording a ‘No Mark’ in the fourth round.

Chopra then skipped the fifth round before coming up with 82.15m in his sixth and final attempt.

The reason for skipping the fifth throw could be that he wanted to keep himself safe and not exert much with the Asian Games coming up next month.

Crossing the 88m mark, however, would have given Chopra some confidence going ahead in the season after coming back from an injury. He responded to Pathirage’s throw of 87.06m to take the top spot after the second round, though the Sri Lankan came back in the third round to assert his supremacy.

The budding rivalry between the two South Asians was in full show after Pathirage clinched the gold and Chopra finished with a silver in the Glasgow Commonwealth Games.

Pathirage has been in the form of his life this season, having also won the Doha and Rome Diamond League meetings, besides clinching gold in Glasgow with a throw of 89.75m. He also breached the coveted 90m mark with a season-leading throw of 92.62m in Rome in June.

In fact, the Sri Lankan has won eight of the nine competitions he has participated in so far in the season.

Chopra, on the other hand, is on a comeback trail after recovering from a lower back injury that has troubled him since September last year.

The injury delayed his return until the Diamond League in Doha. He was not 100 per cent fit in Glasgow but was able to win a silver with a season’s best throw of 85.83m.

“I can’t say my fitness is there like before. But I’m getting there slowly,” Chopra had said at the Glasgow Commonwealth Games.

One of the most consistent javelin throwers ever, two-time Olympic medallist Chopra has finished outside the top two in just two competitions in the last five years.

The Lausanne Diamond League was to see the most high-profile competition in recent memory but it has lost some shine with the pulling out of the reigning world champion Arshad Nadeem and newly-crowned European champion Julian Weber of Germany.

Published – August 22, 2026 02:06 am IST