Social Media Misinformation – Artifex.News https://artifex.news Stay Connected. Stay Informed. Sun, 02 Aug 2026 03:28:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3 https://artifex.news/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cropped-cropped-app-logo-32x32.png Social Media Misinformation – Artifex.News https://artifex.news 32 32 Students return to Jantar Mantar to debunk viral false protest videos https://artifex.news/article71294914-ecerand29/ Sun, 02 Aug 2026 03:28:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71294914-ecerand29/ Read More “Students return to Jantar Mantar to debunk viral false protest videos” »

]]>

Police personnel checking all Vehicles leading towards Jantar Mantar on July 25, 2026. File
| Photo Credit: Sushil Kumar Verma

A week after the 36-day protest led by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) ended at Jantar Mantar, students continue to return to the site, not to stage fresh demonstrations, but to counter what they describe as a wave of misleading social media posts falsely portraying the protest as ongoing.

Instagram has been flooded with videos claiming to show “live” scenes of students clashing with police and marching through heavy security at Jantar Mantar. Carrying timestamps including August 1, July 31 and July 30, several of the clips have amassed millions of views, fuelling speculation that the protest is continuing despite having officially concluded.

One video claiming to be a 6 a.m. update on August 1 has crossed 2.8 million views. Another, presented as a 6.30 a.m. update on July 31, has received 1.9 million views, while other similarly labelled clips have attracted tens of thousands of views.

The viral posts have prompted representatives of student organisations to visit the protest site, enquire with locals and even seek access to CCTV footage in an attempt to publicly refute what they call a fabricated narrative.

On Saturday (August 1) evening, the stretch from Patel Chowk Metro station to Jantar Mantar remained under heavy security. Personnel from the Delhi Police, Border Security Force (BSF) and Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) stood along the route, with police buses and patrol vehicles stationed every few metres. Workers were simultaneously repainting the yellow barricades erected outside the protest site, even as visitors and students continued to walk through the area.

A man welds the barricades of Delhi Police at Jantar Mantar protest site in New Delhi, India, July 31, 2026.

A man welds the barricades of Delhi Police at Jantar Mantar protest site in New Delhi, India, July 31, 2026.
| Photo Credit:
Reuters

“We have been seeing videos on Instagram claiming there are fresh protests by student unions at Jantar Mantar. We came here to verify and debunk those claims,” said Bhim Kumar, a representative of the Krantikari Yuva Sangathan (KYS).

“We spoke to local vendors, student organisations and media personnel, who confirmed no protests have taken place. Police officials have also termed these claims baseless. No student organisation has announced any protest after July 28, but these videos are misleading people into believing demonstrations are still continuing. They are also weakening our cause,” he said.

Student representatives said they also approached those handling CCTV cameras in the area to verify whether any gatherings had taken place. “So far we have not found any evidence to ascertain such protests. We will now discuss the issue with other student organisations before approaching the police with a formal complaint seeking action against the social media handles circulating the videos.

Other students also visited Jantar Mantar to coordinate legal assistance for protesters facing cases in different States and to review developments relating to FIRs registered during the agitation.

Mudita, who participated throughout the 36-day protest, said the movement had shifted from street demonstrations to outreach. “We are continuing to reach students across colleges and universities to discuss the larger problems in the education system. The protest was never only about seeking the Minister’s resignation, it was about addressing deeper structural issues. We are also working on concerns faced by student protesters, including FIRs registered in different States,” she said.

For traders around Jantar Mantar, however, the online misinformation has translated into quieter streets and lower sales. “People still believe the protest is continuing and are afraid to come here. Business has dropped sharply over the past week because visitors are staying away. For a Saturday, this is unusually quiet,” said Dharmender, who manages a 40-year-old sweet shop overlooking the protest site.

At a neighbouring juice stall, Sunny said business had been slowly recovering but remained below normal.“The situation became difficult after the protest. Students still come here every day, and office-goers have also started returning gradually,” he said.

An ice cream vendor outside the visitor entrance echoed the sentiment, saying the decline in footfall had significantly affected sales despite the hot weather.



Source link

]]>
Elon Musk’s Misleading Election Posts Viewed 1.2 Billion Times: Report https://artifex.news/elon-musks-misleading-election-posts-viewed-1-2-billion-times-report-6296247/ Thu, 08 Aug 2024 21:31:46 +0000 https://artifex.news/elon-musks-misleading-election-posts-viewed-1-2-billion-times-report-6296247/ Read More “Elon Musk’s Misleading Election Posts Viewed 1.2 Billion Times: Report” »

]]>

Elon Musk had purchased X platform in 2022 for $44 billion.

San Francisco:

False or misleading US election claims posted on X by Elon Musk have amassed nearly 1.2 billion views this year, a watchdog reported Thursday, highlighting the billionaire’s potential influence on the highly polarized White House race.

Ahead of the November election, researchers have raised alarm that X, formerly Twitter, is a hotbed of political misinformation.

They have also flagged that Musk, who purchased the platform in 2022 and is a vocal backer of Donald Trump, appears to be swaying voters by spreading falsehoods on his personal account.

Researchers from the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) identified 50 posts since January by Musk — who has more than 193 million followers on the social media site — with election claims debunked by independent fact-checkers.

None of the posts displayed a “Community Note,” a crowd-sourced moderation tool that X has promoted as the way for users to add context to posts, CCDH said, raising questions about its effectiveness to combat falsehoods.

“Elon Musk is abusing his privileged position as owner of a… politically influential social media platform to sow disinformation that generates discord and distrust,” warned CCDH chief executive Imran Ahmed.

“The lack of Community Notes on these posts shows that his business is failing woefully to contain the kind of algorithmically-boosted incitement that we all know can lead to real-world violence.”

The posts analyzed by CCDH carried widely debunked claims, such as that Democrats are encouraging illegal migration with the aim of “importing voters” or that the election is vulnerable to fraud. Both claims amassed hundreds of millions of views.

Last week, Musk faced a firehose of criticism for sharing with his followers an AI deepfake video featuring Trump’s Democratic rival, Vice President Kamala Harris.

In it, a voiceover mimicking Harris calls President Joe Biden senile before declaring that she does not “know the first thing about running the country.”

The video, viewed by millions, carried no indication that it was parody — save for a laughing emoji. Only later did Musk clarify that the video was meant as satire.

“Musk behaves as if he is beyond reproach despite growing evidence of the harmful role he is personally playing to fuel disinformation and division ahead of the US elections,” Nora Benavidez, from the advocacy group Free Press Action Fund, told AFP.

“As his behavior edges closer to election interference, it’s up to others — the public, regulatory agencies and advertisers — to hold him accountable for his anti-democratic behavior.”

Musk, who purchased the platform in 2022 for $44 billion, is facing growing scrutiny over his potential influence on voters.

On Monday, a bipartisan group of five US secretaries of state sent an open letter to Musk, urging him to fix X’s AI chatbot known as Grok after it produced election misinformation.

Hours after Biden stepped down from the presidential race last month and endorsed Harris as the Democratic nominee, Grok churned out false information about ballot deadlines, which was amplified by other platforms.

X — which also faced criticism for stoking tensions during recent far-right riots across England — has gutted trust and safety teams and scaled back content moderation efforts once used to tame misinformation, making it what researchers call a haven for disinformation.

X did not respond to an AFP request for comment.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Waiting for response to load…



Source link

]]>