singh – Artifex.News

Opinion: India-China Is Why 'Military Diplomacy' Works

admin — Wed, 15 Jan 2025 06:29:37 +0000

Military diplomacy, or defence diplomacy, may sound like an oxymoron to many, but it must be part of the comprehensive power strategy of any country that wishes to be a regional or a global player. Peacekeeping, deterrence and humanitarian and disaster relief (HADR) are some examples of the kind of soft power a country can exert through hard power projection. All these activities have been successfully conducted by the Indian military and diplomatic establishment for over five decades, since the times of the Korean crisis in 1953. India’s HADR operations and its participation in peacekeeping operations across major conflict zones, along with measures it undertakes to ensure the security of maritime lanes, have won it distinct honour and prestige. Even so, one often hears the complaint that we work in silos, even within the Ministry of Defence. While bureaucracy is accused of highhandedness and functioning without domain knowledge, defence forces are seen as acting with disdain towards complex external factors. In the tussle, it’s diplomacy that suffers ultimately.

Multi-Layered Consultations

One of the most successful examples of India’s military diplomacy has been the firm dealing with China in the years following the Galwan clash in 2020. Stationing our forces in an eyeball-to-eyeball position and the continuous building of infrastructure on the border in the last five years have indeed deterred the Chinese from further escalation. But real success has been achieved by diplomatic and military consultations, facilitated through the established mechanisms of WMCC and Commander-level talks. Dialogue, diplomacy and deterrence remained the key tools for the two countries as the political leadership, right from the Prime Minister to the Defence Minister, the External Affairs Minister, and the National Security Advisor, engaged with their Chinese counterparts.

A Personal Experience In Bangladesh

One would remember the 1971 Bangladesh war of independence. It was the era of the Cold War and powerful naval assets dominated the scene. Nixon had ordered the US Seventh Fleet’s Task Force 74, led by the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Enterprise, to proceed towards the Bay of Bengal. As the US moved in favour of Pakistan to intimidate India, the Soviets sent their warships to the Indian Ocean to confront the Americans. The standoff gave enough leverage to India to help the Bangladeshis continue their crusade against Islamabad. India could play a critical role in the conflict in no small measure due to Soviet assistance. In fact, in the later years, the Soviet state also played a significant role in converting the relationship between India and Bangladesh into a special and privileged strategic partnership. The successor state, Russia, remains a trusted partner for India even today. The case is a clear display of military diplomacy and how it can become a defining feature of any bilateral relationship.

I was posted in Bangladesh in the mid-1980s, when the country was under the rule of the anti-India regime of General Ershad. Something unique happened one day. Reports came in that riots, apparently state-managed, had broken out in certain parts of the country, targeting Hindu civilians; the famous Dhakeshwari temple in Dhaka was also vandalised and defiled by miscreants. Frantic calls kept coming in and many Hindu leaders rushed for help. While the High Commission was mulling over responses, news arrived that Indian forces (namely, the Indian Peace Keeping Force, or IPKF) had landed in Jaffna, Sri Lanka. This news in itself ended up having a deterring and salutary impact and the government machinery doubled down to contain the riots in less than two hours. Fear served its purpose. President Ershad also sent his special envoy to India to visit the then Prime Minister. While the story of the success of the IPKF in Sri Lanka has seen mixed commentary, the unintended effects in a third country can’t be ignored.

India’s Peacekeeping Efforts

India, being part of the largest number of UN deployments, has excelled in peacekeeping operations. I recall meeting President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf of Liberia once. She was full of praise for the Indian female contingent and its role in her country. Over the years, this dimension of India’s diplomacy has become one of the key supporting arguments for India’s claims for a permanent seat in the UNSC, an organisation it co-founded with others and to which it has remained committed, albeit with suggestions for reforms. Here again, one notices the congruences of military diplomacy.

From evacuation operations in conflict or disease-ridden zones to providing maritime security against piracy, terrorism and interventions by non-state actors, the role of Indian forces is critical. The most recent example has been the way the Indian Navy has kept the sea lines of communications (SLOCS) open under the unremitting Houthi attacks in the Red Sea and even the Indian Ocean. Likewise, from Nepal and Turkey to Africa and Latin America, providing humanitarian assistance in the wake of manmade or natural disasters has become the hallmark of Indian foreign and security diplomacy.

Bring Down Silos

In today’s landscape, riddled with grey zone warfare tactics and advanced cyber threats, a robust communication strategy and techno-economic inputs are indispensable. Perhaps the government should consider conducting regular briefings of retired diplomats and defence personnel, who can be good and reliable interlocutors if they have the line and facts at their disposal. It is also imperative to not only do a SWOT analysis of structural gaps in India’s military diplomacy but also define the turfs of various branches and forces in order to create an integrated strategy. For the military, that shouldn’t be difficult with the recently set up institution of the Chief of Defence Staff (CDS).

Defence, security and technology are critical drivers of strategic cooperation between countries and thus, they must be specifically and vigorously pursued. The defence sector under the ‘Make in India’ vision has become a priority, and military diplomacy can play an important role here. India has instituted 2+2 dialogues with various countries at the Defence Minister and External Affairs Minister (EAM) levels. This should percolate down to the grassroots, to bridge the divide between defence forces, bureaucracy and diplomats. A whole-of-government approach is the need of the hour.

(The author is India’s former Ambassador to Jordan, Libya and Malta)

Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author

Source link

Congress vs BJP Parliament Debate Is Just A Teaser For More Disruption And Chaos

admin — Wed, 03 Jul 2024 08:22:33 +0000

The Lok Sabha witnessed heated exchanges between the treasury benches and the opposition during the Motion of Thanks to the President’s address. The claims, counterclaims, and interjections all point towards a confrontational atmosphere in the 18th Lok Sabha, perhaps shaped by changes in its composition.

From 2019 to 2024, the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) and friendly parties held a significant lead of around 300 MPs over the INDIA bloc and opposition. However, this session saw the margin narrowing to just 60 MPs. The verbal sparring between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi turned acrimonious and personal, reflecting the recently concluded election campaign dynamics and entrenched positions.

Both Congress And BJP Remain Steadfast

While the Congress aims to sustain momentum, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) remains resolute not to concede further ground. The shift in strength, allocation of time for parties, and the calibre of speakers on both sides will significantly influence proceedings over the next five years. During the recent Motion of Thanks debate, Rahul Gandhi, as Leader of the Opposition, spoke for nearly an hour and 40 minutes out of the allotted 16 hours – roughly 15% of the total time allotted to the opposition.

Time allocations are based on Lok Sabha strength. During the No Confidence Motion of August 2023, the BJP received around 45% of the time, while the Congress’ share was just 18% With the BJP’s friendly parties (the Biju Janata Dal, the YSR Congress Party, the Bahujan Samaj Party) losing ground in recent elections, their allocation has shifted notably to opposition parties.

Also Read | ‘Hug, Wink In Parliament’: PM Modi’s Dig At Rahul Gandhi

Some prominent speakers from the treasury benches, such as Smriti Irani, were notably absent. Conversely, the presence of parties like the Samajwadi Party (SP) has bolstered the opposition, particularly with effective speakers in fluent Hindi. Akhilesh Yadav’s speech, noted for its sarcasm without overt anger, followed Rahul’s assertive tone.

Rahul’s Performance As LoP

During Monday’s session, Rahul Gandhi launched a scathing attack on the Modi government, highlighting issues including inflation, unemployment, NEET, Minimum Support Price (MSP) for crops, the Agniveer scheme, and Hindutva, aiming to put the government on the defensive. Top ministers, including the Prime Minister, intervened during Rahul’s speech.

While Rahul addressed critical issues, some noted the absence of specific data and figures in his speech. There is already an ongoing debate over Rahul’s performance in his role as Leader of the Opposition, with supporters arguing his assertiveness marks a significant political presence that cannot be ignored.

Not new to controversy, Rahul made a reference to the BJP and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), stating, that those who called themselves Hindu only talked about violence, hatred, and untruth. PM Modi rebutted instantly.

Also Read | “Every MP’s Right”: Rahul Gandhi Questions Expunging Of Parts Of Speech

References in Rahul’s speech to to Hinduism and violence, two prominent industrialists, the Agnipath scheme, and NEET, were expunged. The LoP subsequently wrote to the Speaker questioning the decision and demanding the restoration of his remarks in parliamentary records.

Modi’s Address

On Tuesday, PM Modi delivered the concluding remarks on the Motion of Thanks in the Lok Sabha. His speech, lasting around 2.5 hours, was a scathing attack on the Congress and Rahul. Throughout his address, the opposition shouted slogans, prompting Modi to use headphones to counter the noise. Despite the interruptions, Modi’s speech, though not entirely audible, gave enough hints of the things to come in the next five years.

Modi criticised the opposition’s maturity level, noting that while the treasury benches listened to Rahul’s speech with interjections rather than shouting slogans, the opposition did not afford the same respect to the Prime Minister. Expressing displeasure at the sloganeering, Modi referred to Rahul as “balak buddhi” (childish) and mocked how a party celebrating 99 out of 543 seats was acting as if it had won 99 out of 100. He criticised the Congress party’s promise of transferring Rs. 1 lakh to women’s bank accounts, highlighting the public’s scepticism about similar promises made earlier.

Modi accused Rahul of resorting to drama to garner sympathy, pointing out his bail status in alleged financial misconduct.

Overall, the debate was disappointing for both the opposition and the ruling party. BJP leaders neglected discussion around their agenda for the next five years, while the opposition failed to engage in constructive criticism and effectively address issues like NEET. Both sides instead resorted to mudslinging, seemingly forgetting that the elections were over.

The session’s outcome suggests the potential for more disruptions and chaos in Parliament. Both sides must reconcile with the electoral mandate and strive for a fresh start in the upcoming Budget session.

(Amitabh Tiwari is a political strategist and commentator. In his earlier avatar, he was a corporate and investment banker.)

Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author

Source link