Sheikh Hasina death sentence – Artifex.News

Bangladesh’s interim government warns media against publishing statements of ‘fugitive’ Sheikh Hasina

admin — Tue, 18 Nov 2025 05:44:00 +0000

Sheikh Hasina has been living in India since she fled Bangladesh on August 5 last year in the face of the massive protests. She was earlier declared a fugitive by the court. File
| Photo Credit: The Hindu

Bangladesh’s interim government has warned all print, electronic and online media outlets to refrain from reporting statements issued by “convicted and fugitive” deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina, citing concerns over national security and public order.

The National Cyber Security Agency (NCSA) in a press release issued on Monday (November 17, 2025) claimed that Ms. Hasina’s statements may contain directives or calls capable of inciting “violence, disorder and criminal activities” and disrupting social harmony, The Daily Star newspaper reported.

“We urge the media to act responsibly in the interest of national security,” the release said.

The agency said it was “deeply concerned” that some media organisations were broadcasting and publishing remarks attributed to “convicted” and “fugitive” Ms. Hasina.

Noting that airing or publishing statements from individuals who are both convicted and fugitive violates provisions of the Cyber Security Ordinance, the agency warned that authorities are empowered to “remove or block content that threatens national integrity, security or public order, promotes ethnic or religious hatred, or directly incites violence”.

It further said that using a false identity or illegally accessing systems to spread hate speech, ethnic incitement or calls for violence is a punishable offence, and provides for penalties of up to two years of imprisonment and/or fines of up to Tk 10 lakh.

Emphasising that it respects freedom of the press and expression, the NCSA urged media houses to “avoid” carrying any “violent, instigating or criminally provocative” statements from convicted individuals and to “remain mindful of their legal obligations”.

Ms. Hasina, 78, was on Monday (November 17) sentenced to death in absentia by Bangladesh’s International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) for “crimes against humanity” over her government’s brutal crackdown on student-led protests last year.

It also handed the death sentence to former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal on similar charges.

Ms. Hasina has been living in India since she fled Bangladesh on August 5 last year in the face of the massive protests. She was earlier declared a fugitive by the court.

Bangladesh’s Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus has hailed the verdict, saying the ruling affirmed a fundamental principle, “no one, regardless of power, is above the law”.

Commenting on the verdict, Ms. Hasina denied the charges as “biased and politically motivated” and said the judgment has been made by a “rigged tribunal” established and presided over by an “unelected government with no democratic mandate”.

Published – November 18, 2025 11:14 am IST

Source link

Bangladesh deposed PM Sheikh Hasina, former Home Minister Kamal sentenced to death; security on high alert

admin — Mon, 17 Nov 2025 09:56:00 +0000

The International Crimes Tribunal-1 has ordered the execution by hanging of ousted Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and former Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal after finding them guilty of genocide committed during the July-August 2024 violence in a case involving crimes against humanity. At the same time, former Inspector General of Police (IGP) Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun who turned state witness and testified before the tribunal against the former Prime Minister and Home Minister has been sentenced to five years in prison after admitting his involvement.

ICT verdict on Hasina LIVE: Death sentence to ousted Bangladesh PM Sheikh Hasina, former Minister Kamal in students crackdown case

On Monday (November 17, 2025), the three-member tribunal, led by Justice Md. Golam Mortuza Mozumder, read the summary of 453-page verdict consists of six sections in absence of Sheikh Hasina and Asaduzzaman Khan. The other members of the tribunal are Justice Md. Shafiul Alam Mahmood and Md. Mohitul Haque Enam Chowdhury. ICT started reading the verdict at around 12:30 p.m. Bangladesh Television broadcasted the verdict live from the courtroom of ICT-1. Earlier, Prosecutor Tajul Islam had appealed for the highest punishment for Sheikh Hasina in this case.

Former IGP Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun was brought before the Tribunal at around 9:10 a.m., in a prison van under heavy security. Mir Mahbubur Rahman Snigdha, brother of Mir Mugdha who was killed during the July uprising, came to hear the verdict at the tribunal where he said, “For the injustice and brutality committed by Sheikh Hasina, even a thousand death sentences would not be enough. It is not only necessary to announce the verdict, but she must also be brought back to the country as soon as the verdict is delivered, and the punishment must be executed on the soil of this country.”

From job quota to Sheikh Hasina’s resignation: Timeline of the Bangladesh student protests

Leaders and activists from various political and social organisations gathered outside the International Crimes Tribunal as the verdict in the case against former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was being read out. A group of students also gathered in the TSC area of Dhaka University. They were seen chanting slogans demanding the execution of Sheikh Hasina.

Unrest has erupted in several parts of the country surrounding the verdict. A two-day lockdown called by Sheikh Hasina’s Party Bangladesh Awami League has been observed for the last two days. The party activists brought out processions in several places protesting the verdict. Several Awami League leaders and activists have also been arrested. Crude bombs were also blasted in same places including in front of the office of National Citizen Party (NCP) that led the July uprising against Hasina last year.

Centering the verdict, Dhaka is on high alert, heavy security has been deployed around the International Crimes Tribunal. From the Supreme Court premises to the tribunal compound, members of the Army, police, Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), and Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) have been positioned in large numbers. Since Monday morning (November 17, 2025), the tribunal and its surrounding areas have been placed under a tight security cordon. Security personnel were seen maintaining strict vigilance around the Supreme Court. Army members were seen stationed near the Mazar Gate in the capital, while police, RAB, and other law enforcement units patrolled both inside and outside the tribunal premises. Under the initiative of Ministry of Cultural Affairs, large screens were set up at key locations across the capital to broadcast the proceedings, allowing the public to follow the verdict in real time.

The verdict has also been streamed live for audiences around the world. Dhaka Metropolitan Police (DMP) Commissioner Sheikh Mohammad Sajjat Ali has instructed police personnel to open fire if anyone attempts to torch vehicles or hurl crude bombs that endanger lives.

Ahead of the verdict, a group of protesters claiming affiliation with an organisation called “Red July” brought two excavators to demolish the remaining portions of the house of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman at Dhanmondi-32 in Dhaka around at 12 noon. Army and police charged batons on the protesters. At least two sound grenades were lobbed to disperse the protesters.

Following the fall of Awami League government on August 5, 2024, the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) was reconstituted. The first case (a miscellaneous case) taken up by the reorganised tribunal regarding crimes against humanity committed during the July mass uprising was filed against Sheikh Hasina. On October 17, 2024, the first hearing of the reconstituted tribunal was held, and on the same day, an arrest warrant was issued against Sheikh Hasina.

Initially, Sheikh Hasina was the sole accused in the case. On March 16, 2025, the prosecution sought to include former IGP Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun as a co-accused along with Sheikh Hasina, and the tribunal granted the request. After several extensions, the tribunal’s investigation agency submitted the investigation report to the Office of the Chief Prosecutor on May 12, 2025. On June 1, 2025, the prosecution submitted formal charges against all three accused.

Sheikh Hasina and Asaduzzaman Khan remain fugitives and former IGP Abdullah Al-Mamun is the only accused under arrest. On the day charges were framed (July 10), Mamun admitted involvement in crimes against humanity committed during the mass uprising and applied to become an “approver” (state witness). Arguments in the case began on October 12 and concluded on October 23. Chief Prosecutor Tajul Islam demanded the death penalty for Sheikh Hasina and Asaduzzaman Khan for crimes against humanity during the July uprising.

State-appointed lawyer Md. Amir Hossain represented fugitive accused Sheikh Hasina and Asaduzzaman. In arguments, he sought acquittal for both. The lawyer for approver Abdullah Al-Mamun, Zayed Bin Amjad, also sought acquittal. The prosecution listed 81 witnesses. Of them, 54, including Abdullah Al-Mamun and the investigation officers, testified before the tribunal. The prosecution’s charge sheet was 135 pages long, accompanied by 8,747 pages of documents and evidence.

A total of five charges have been brought against Sheikh Hasina and the two other accused in the case. These include: delivering inciting speeches; ordering the elimination of protesters using lethal weapons; the shooting and killing of Abu Said, a student of Begum Rokeya University in Rangpur; the shooting and killing of six protesters in the Chankharpul area of the capital; and the killing of six people by burning them in Ashulia.

Published – November 17, 2025 03:26 pm IST

Source link

Bangladesh’s Sheikh Hasina condemns guilty verdict in crimes against humanity trial

admin — Mon, 17 Nov 2025 09:56:00 +0000

Former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. File
| Photo Credit: Reuters

Bangladesh’s fugitive former prime minister Sheikh Hasina on Monday (November 17, 2025) called the guilty verdict and death sentence in her crimes against humanity trial “biased and politically motivated”.

Ms. Hasina, 78, defied court orders that she return from India to attend her trial about whether she ordered a deadly crackdown against the student-led uprising that ousted her.

She was found guilty and sentenced to death earlier on Monday.

ICT verdict on Hasina LIVE: Death sentence to ousted Bangladesh PM Sheikh Hasina, former Minister Kamal in students crackdown case

“The verdicts announced against me have been made by a rigged tribunal established and presided over by an unelected government with no democratic mandate,” Ms. Hasina said in a statement issued from hiding in India.

“They are biased and politically motivated.”

Critics accused her of jailing political rivals, enacting harsh anti-press laws, and overseeing widespread human rights abuses, including the killing of opposition activists.

From job quota to Sheikh Hasina’s resignation: Timeline of the Bangladesh student protests

But the trial centred around the 1,400 people who were killed between July and August 2024, according to the United Nations.

Ms. Hasina was assigned a state-appointed lawyer for the trial, but she refused to recognise the court’s authority and said she rejected all charges.

“Its guilty verdict against me was a foregone conclusion,” Ms. Hasina added in the statement, claiming she would be willing to attend a fresh trial outside her home nation.

“I am not afraid to face my accusers in a proper tribunal where the evidence can be weighed and tested fairly,” she said.

“That is why I have repeatedly challenged the interim government to bring these charges before the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague.”

Bangladesh’s foreign ministry summoned India’s envoy to Dhaka this month, demanding that New Delhi block the “notorious fugitive” Hasina from talking to journalists and “granting her a platform to spew hatred”.

The International Crisis Group said the “political repercussions of this verdict are significant”.

“The process has not been without critics,” ICG analyst Thomas Kean said.

“In absentia trials are often a source of contention, and in this case the speed with which the hearings were conducted and the apparent lack of resources for the defence also raise questions of fairness… But they should not be used to downplay or deflect from Sheikh Hasina’s actions”.

Mr. Kean added: “The prospect of Sheikh Hasina mounting a political comeback in Bangladesh now appears very slim”.

Published – November 17, 2025 03:26 pm IST

Source link