New Delhi:

The Delhi High Court on Monday told Sharjeel Imam — an accused in the 2020 northeast Delhi riots case — that it has not stayed the trial proceedings in the sedition case linked to his alleged inflammatory speeches at Aligarh Muslim University and Jamia area against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA).

“There is no stay, the trial would obviously proceed. If the trial court comes to a conclusion that enough material exists, it will proceed to frame charges,” clarified the Bench of Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri when Imam’s counsel pointed out that the trial court had proceeded to frame charges against his client.

The Delhi High Court was hearing Imam’s plea seeking quashing of sedition and hate speech charges against him under Sections 124A and 153A of the now-repealed Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The matter was deferred after an adjournment was sought on behalf of Delhi Police.

Last week, the Supreme Court refused to entertain a plea filed by Sharjeel Imam seeking bail in an alleged larger conspiracy behind the 2020 Delhi riots.

It said that Imam, accused under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), should not have moved a writ petition directly before the apex court when his bail plea is pending adjudication before the Delhi High Court. However, the top court asked the Delhi High Court to hear Imam’s bail plea on the date fixed and decide it expeditiously.

In his appeal filed before the Delhi HC, the former Jawaharlal Nehru University student and activist has challenged the trial court order, which had previously denied him bail, following his arrest in August 2020 in connection with the case. He has been in custody since January 2020, facing multiple FIRs related to the violence.

According to the police, Imam made the alleged inflammatory speeches in Jamia Millia Islamia, Delhi on December 13, 2019, and in Aligarh Muslim University, Uttar Pradesh on January 16, 2020.

JNU scholars and activists Imam and Umar Khalid are among the nearly dozen people reportedly involved in the alleged larger conspiracy linked to the Delhi riots of 2020, as per the Delhi Police. Imam and Khalid are facing charges in connection with making inflammatory speeches which allegedly fuelled the violence, as per the police.

The riots broke out in the national capital in February 2020 as clashes between the anti-CAA (Citizenship Amendment Act) and pro-CAA protesters took a violent turn. The mayhem saw more than 50 people lose their lives, besides leaving over 700 people injured.

The Delhi High Court, on May 29, granted statutory bail to Sharjeel Imam in a sedition case. However, he continued to remain in jail due to his involvement in the larger conspiracy case.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

New Delhi:

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday refused to grant an “early hearing” to student activist Sharjeel Imam on his plea seeking bail in a case registered against him under anti-terror law UAPA over the alleged larger conspiracy behind the communal riots that erupted in the national capital in February 2020.

A bench headed by Justice Suresh Kumar Kait said since the matter was already listed for final hearing on October 7, there was no ground to advance the date.

Imam, Umar Khalid and several others have been booked under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and provisions of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly being the “masterminds” of the February 2020 riots, which had left 53 people dead and over 700 injured.

The violence had erupted during the protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC).

Imam’s counsel told the matter that his appeal challenging the trial court order rejecting his bail application has been pending for 28 months and despite the case being listed several times, it has not reached its conclusion.

The bench, also comprising Justice Girish Kathpalia, observed that every day there are over 80 matters listed before it and Imam’s appeal is listed only next month at a fixed time along with similar appeals by other co-accused.

“Since appeal is listed for final hearing on October 7 at 3:15 pm, there is no ground to prepone the date. The application is dismissed,” the court said.

In his application seeking early hearing, Imam said his plea has been listed for hearing at least 62 times before seven different division benches of the high court after issuance of notice in 2022.

“On account of frequent changes in the composition of benches owing to roster change, recusal and transfer of honourable judges, the hearing in the matter never concluded and thereby having led to a fresh cycle of hearing beginning every such time,” the application said.

The plea also emphasised that the trial in the present matter has been pending before the special court since 2020 but the investigation was still ongoing and charges have not yet been framed so far.

“The trial in the present case shall be protracted and will take a long time to even commence, much less conclude.On account of appellant’s continued incarceration for almost four-and-a-half years, the appellant, a research scholar who has spent his entire life seeking academic pursuits, is unable to pursue his education and graduate with a doctorate degree,” The Supreme Court has ruled that bail applications ought to be decided expeditiously and preferably within two-four weeks, and the NIA Act also states that appeals have to be decided as far as possible within a period of three months from the date of admission of the appeal, the plea further said.

Imam, in his appeal filed in 2022, has assailed a trial court order of April 11, 2022 that denied him bail.

Delhi Police, which arrested Imam in the present case on August 25, 2020, earlier opposed the bail plea on the grounds that he mobilised people from the minority community and “propagated” ‘chakka’ jam (strike) as a mode of disruption with “no window for peaceful protest”.

Police claimed the protests were part of a conspiracy to cause violence to coincide with the visit of then US President Donald Trump, and Imam, in his public addresses, propagated the idea of chakka jam as the plan of action to paralyse the government.

On August 29, the court had listed for hearing on October 7 the bail plea of Imam and other co-accused, including former JNU student Umar Khalid, in the matter. 

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

New Delhi:

Nearly four-and-a-half years after he was arrested on charges of delivering inflammatory speeches, activist Sharjeel Imam was granted bail by Delhi High Court today. Sharjeel Imam had challenged a trial court order that refused him bail and argued that he had already undergone more than half of the maximum sentence he can be awarded if he is convicted in the case.

A research scholar with Jawaharlal Nehru University, he was arrested in January 2020 after a sedition case was registered against him for an alleged call to cut off the Northeast from the rest of India. The remarks were made amid protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act. Cases against the activist were registered in several states, including Delhi, Assam, Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh.

According to Delhi Police, Sharjeel Imam made divisive speeches at events in Jamia Millia Islamia University and at Aligarh Muslim University. He was allegedly one of the organisers of the protest at Delhi’s Shaheen Bagh against the new citizenship law.

Arguing before the high court bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Manoj Jain, the prosecution said Sharjeel Imam had allegedly threatened to cut off the North East from the country in his speeches. Imam was charged under the IPC section relating to sedition, and Section 13 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act was also invoked.

Seeking bail, the activist told the court that the maximum sentence under Section 13 of UAPA is seven years and he has already been in custody for over four. A trial court had earlier refused him bail, noting that an accused’s custody could be extended in “exceptional circumstances”.

Imam is also an accused in several cases linked to the 2020 riots in North-east Delhi.