SCBA resolution – Artifex.News https://artifex.news Stay Connected. Stay Informed. Fri, 08 May 2026 17:18:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 https://artifex.news/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cropped-cropped-app-logo-32x32.png SCBA resolution – Artifex.News https://artifex.news 32 32 SC takes cognisance of resolution about HC judge sending advocate to custody https://artifex.news/article70956711-ecerand29/ Fri, 08 May 2026 17:18:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70956711-ecerand29/ Read More “SC takes cognisance of resolution about HC judge sending advocate to custody” »

]]>

Supreme Court of India. File.
| Photo Credit: SUSHIL KUMAR VERMA

The Supreme Court on Friday (May 8, 2026) took cognisance of a representation made by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) about a video footage showing an Andhra Pradesh High Court judge sending a young advocate to a day’s judicial custody for a procedural lapse.

The court’s official website showed the case tentatively listed for hearing on May 15.

The SCBA had urged Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, in a resolution passed on May 6, to look into the incident while expressing shock at the judge’s reported conduct.

The SCBA resolution, issued through its president Vikas Singh, had highlighted that judicial strength was best demonstrated through patience, rather than fear, especially when dealing with young advocates who were still new to the profession.

“The SCBA expresses its deep concern and shock at the reported incident dated May 5, 2026, before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, wherein a young advocate was allegedly directed to be taken into judicial custody for 24 hours during court proceedings before Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao,” the SCBA resolution had stated.

The Bar Council of India (BCI), a statutory body of lawyers, had also sought an urgent intervention of the Chief Justice in the same matter.

In a formal representation, the BCI has said that despite the advocate “repeatedly seeking pardon and mercy” and claiming he was in physical pain, the judge remained “unmoved”.



Source link

]]>