Rishabh Pant – Artifex.News https://artifex.news Stay Connected. Stay Informed. Mon, 31 Aug 2026 03:31:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2 https://artifex.news/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cropped-cropped-app-logo-32x32.png Rishabh Pant – Artifex.News https://artifex.news 32 32 Dhruv Jurel — a blend of versatility and fortitude https://artifex.news/article71408785-ece/ Mon, 31 Aug 2026 03:31:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71408785-ece/ Read More “Dhruv Jurel — a blend of versatility and fortitude” »

]]>

Even before November 1999, a host of exceptional wicketkeeper-batters had graced the international scene, not least India’s own Farokh Engineer and the wonderful Andy Flower from Zimbabwe. But from the time a left-hander from Western Australia stormed the Test firmament at the Gabba in Brisbane nearly 27 years back with a bruising 81 on debut, against a shell-shocked Pakistani outfit, wicketkeeper-batters have been looked at in an entirely different vein.

Adam Gilchrist rewrote the dynamics of Test batsmanship. He was a destructive opener in limited-overs cricket long before he played his first Test, and reeled off numerous wondrous knocks, including in the final of the 50-over 2007 World Cup when, with a squash ball for company, he bludgeoned his way to 149 against Mahela Jaywardene’s Sri Lanka in a decisive effort that took Australia to a hat-trick of titles. But it was in the red-ball game that Gilchrist set stall as a pioneer, providing not just meaningful heft to the Australian batting but scoring runs at such a furious clip that opponents were often ducking, unsuccessfully, for cover.

For the most part of his glittering career that encompassed 96 Tests, the left-hander had the luxury of batting behind a grand top six that used different methodologies to subjugate bowling attacks in all parts of the world. The sight of Gilchrist, the destroyer supreme, striding in purposefully at No. 7, was dispiriting or exhilarating, depending on which side of the fence one was. Gilchrist seldom disappointed; when he scored his runs, he did so with not just panache and chutzpah but also with a violent streak that damaged bowling figures as well as egos. How could anyone bat with such unchecked aggression at No. 7? How could someone fuse a no-holds-barred approach with such consistency (as an average of 47.60 at a strike-rate of 81.95 will unequivocally testify to)?

Gold standard

Gilchrist will remain the gold standard among wicketkeeper-batters, the platform from which the likes of Mahendra Singh Dhoni, more than anyone else, launched himself into the stratosphere. Gilchrist’s towering presence kept an entire generation – or more – of Aussie stumper-batters out of international reckoning. India, however, found a judicious balance; while Dhoni’s aggression in front of the stumps and his brilliance behind it precluded a dynamic new force breaking through, India were compelled to find a place, if only as a specialist batter, for Dinesh Karthik, the ebullient little right-hander from Chennai who was more than good enough to hold his own as a batter.

Karthik wasn’t the first Indian gloveman to play as a specialist batter. Nearly four decades before him, Budhi Kunderan donned that role, even opening the batting in England in 1967 alongside designated wicketkeeper Engineer. A couple of decades on, Chandrakant Pandit played as a middle-order bat with Kiran More slotting in as the wicketkeeper. Such was Karthik’s great natural ability – which he didn’t maximise, he will acknowledge – that in the Dhoni era, India fielded him as a full-fledged opener overseas, and with no little success. Alongside Wasim Jaffer, Karthik formed an excellent opening combine in Bangladesh and England in 2007, bringing up his only Test ton across the border and bettering that effort by emerging as India’s highest scorer in England, when they last won a Test series there by a slender 1-0 margin.

Karthik played his last eight Tests down the order, sometimes when Dhoni wasn’t available (including through retirement) and he donned the big gloves, and at others when he played alongside the Jharkhandi as a pure batter. Just one half-century in his last 14 Test innings meant he played the last of his 26 Tests in August 2018; his Test average of 25 was decidedly underwhelming, given his supreme gift as a batter, but that can happen when one is overeager and anxious to not just justify their selection but also state their case for a longer rope.

India now have a profusion of excellent wicketkeeper-batters across formats – Rishabh Pant, of course, tops that chart, especially when it comes to the red-ball variant, but there are a host of others that can’t be ignored. Among them are Sanju Samson and Ishan Kishan, exclusive when it comes to the white-ball version. And Dhruv Jurel, the 25-year-old from Agra whose first Test cap came as a wicketkeeper against England in Rajkot in February 2024 when Pant was out after his horrific road accident of 14 months previously and KS Bharat had played himself out of the XI with poor efforts in the first two Tests in Hyderabad and Visakhapatnam respectively.

The generational talent that Pant is, he kept almost exclusively from the time he made his Test debut in Nottingham in August 2018 and made a stunning 114 in his third appearance at the Oval till his single-car accident in December 2022 when India were suddenly forced to scramble for a replacement. Bharat, from Andhra, won the early nod for the home Tests against Australia in February 2023 and donned the big gloves in the final of the World Test Championship against the same opponents that June. KL Rahul was nominated the first-choice stumper for the two Tests in South Africa towards the end of the year, more to provide stability and class to the lower order in a line-up from which very few had played in South Africa previously. Bharat reclaimed his spot behind the sticks against England at home and played himself out of the XI following scores of 41, 28, 17 and 6 which meant that in seven Tests and 12 innings, he only averaged 20.09, a definite no-no given that the wicketkeeper’s was no longer a single-discipline specialised slot.

Out went the call to Jurel for the third Test in Rajkot with the series finely poised at 1-1, and it was immediately apparent that India had hit upon a gold mine. The right-hander made a poised 46 on debut, and upped the ante in the next match with scores of 90 and 39 not out, the first ensuring that India didn’t end up conceding a massive lead and the second taking them home in a tense run-chase when he and Shubman Gill put on 72 for the unfinished sixth-wicket stand.

This was in February 2024, when one wasn’t sure when Pant would be available for selection though in a characteristic show of gumption and guts, the stocky left-hander was far ahead of the timelines the doctors had tentatively outlined for a possible comeback to competitive cricket. Pant was ready for international cricket in September that year, making a remarkable recovery from a series of potentially life-threatening injuries to smash 109 on his comeback Test in Chennai against Bangladesh. Suddenly, Jurel faced an uncertain future. Despite an impressive start to his Test career, he had to bow before the irrepressible force that Pant was, though it was always on the cards that he could slot in alongside Pant, if not necessarily ahead of him.

In six of his last nine Tests, Jurel has occupied a specialist batter’s position between No. 4 and No. 8 (and that only because Akash Deep was employed as a nightwatchman at the Oval last August). On the three occasions when was the designated wicketkeeper, Pant was unavailable through injury after breaking his right foot in the Manchester Test against England in July last year. Despite the vast array of batting riches at India’s disposal, head coach Gautam Gambhir has identified in Jurel a dependable batting option, and the man from Uttar Pradesh has comprehensively justified that faith with two hundreds and a fifty in those nine Tests and 15 innings.

Jurel’s coming-of-age moment, if it can be called that, transpired in Ahmedabad last October with Pant still to recover from the broken foot. In India’s only innings against West Indies, he uncorked an excellent 125, then followed it up with 44 in the next Test in Delhi. With Pant returning to action against South Africa in November, Jurel continued on as a batter alone though like the rest of his colleagues, he had a series to forget with outings of 14, 13, 0 and 2 in a disastrous 0-2 result that has comprehensively dented India’s hopes of making a third WTC final in four cycles.

But instead of pressing the panic button and looking elsewhere, the decision-makers continued to invest their belief in him and Jurel has responded in style. Towards the end of June, he was a part of the India ‘A’ squad that travelled on the ‘shadow’ tour of Sri Lanka for two unofficial ‘Tests’, ostensibly at the insistence of Gambhir because of his felicity against the turning ball. Jurel warmed up nicely for the Test series to follow with scores of 141 not out, 14 and 53, and it was no surprise that he was picked for the first Test in Galle, when he weighed in with 51 and 7 in a winning cause.

In Colombo last week, Jurel went one better with an unbeaten 115 during which he brought his technical expertise and his mental fortitude into play. He also kept wickets for a while when Pant was recovering from a blow to his right shoulder sustained while batting, and when he went back to the outfield, took a terrific running catch from point to get rid of Lahiru Kumara in Sri Lanka’s first innings. At every stage in every role, he has looked the part, making his presence felt with total commitment and a never-say-die spirit without seeking recourse to the flashy and the flamboyant.

Jurel was chosen for Sri Lanka for his ability to play spin with finesse, and it is hard now to see him being overlooked during the November Test tour of New Zealand where the challenges for batters will be vastly different. At No. 6, behind Pant, he has the technique to tackle the second new ball if that is what he is confronted with. Ravindra Jadeja behind him in the batting order and the possible return of Washington Sundar from injury mean he is a right-handed option around a plethora of left-handers, and while that alone can’t be a qualification, he has shown that he can hold his own against bowling of any kind in any conditions.

India are fortunate that in Jurel, they have a three-in-one cricketer with his entire future ahead of him. As a batting average of 40.68 from 12 Tests proves, he is every bit deserving of the show of confidence. A place in the starting XI in Wellington in November is no more than he deserves; one can rest assured that Jurel will be short on neither preparation nor fire when ‘Play’ is called at the Basin Reserve.



Source link

]]>
Playing Test cricket is a privilege: Jurel https://artifex.news/article71385034-ece/ Mon, 24 Aug 2026 22:01:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71385034-ece/ Read More “Playing Test cricket is a privilege: Jurel” »

]]>

India’s Dhruv Jurel celebrates his century on day two of the second Test cricket match between India and Sri Lanka, in Colombo, Sri Lanka, on August 24, 2026.
| Photo Credit: PTI

Time seemingly paused as Dhruv Jurel batted on 99. With Mohammed Siraj for company, and an anxious Indian camp watching from the dressing room, Jurel took 13 deliveries to move to his coveted hundred while surviving a run out attempt too in the process. His knock deflated host Sri Lanka in the second Test.

Speaking to the media in Colombo on Monday (August 24, 2026) and recalling that nervous-nineties phase, Jurel said: “So actually, when I was on 99, before that I was getting runs, and on 99, he (Asitha Fernando) started bowling good lengths. When I played that shot (for the hundred), thought it was going past the fielder, that there was a gap, and then I was like oh God!”

On a stop-start day due to the rains, Jurel seemed at ease, and he explained: “I am used to it because I was here with India A and am aware of the situation, about the (rain) breaks. I was just trying to bat in partnerships and also assess the conditions. Even if I scored a 100 today, tomorrow I will go and start from zero, that’s how it is.”

When Sri Lanka turned up for the first innings, Jurel donned the wicket-keeping gloves. Clarifying that move, he said: “Right now, (Rishabh) Pant has a sore right shoulder. We are closely monitoring him. Today I kept wickets, hopefully he will be fit.”

Among the rivals, Jurel lauded Asitha: “It was so hot and he used the short ball. It’s not easy for a bowler, and he was really challenging, especially when I was on 99.” Stressing that playing red-ball cricket is important, Jurel said: “Playing Test cricket is a privilege. We want to play well both in white and in blue.”



Source link

]]>
Pant —an enigma at the crossroads https://artifex.news/article71325824-ece/ Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:32:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71325824-ece/ Read More “Pant —an enigma at the crossroads” »

]]>

When we talk one-format India internationals in the current milieu, almost all the focus is on India’s two immediate all-format past skippers. Since May 2025, when they bid adieu to Test cricket within weeks of each other, Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli play for the country only in One-Day Internationals, having already announced their retirement from T20Is at the conclusion of a triumphant World T20 campaign in Bridgetown in June 2024.

There has been so much talk about whether one, or both, or neither, will be present at next year’s 50-over World Cup in southern Africa that most other issues have been relegated to the background. Including the fact that there is another high-profile one-format-only international in recent times, a young man who has completed a decade in India colours but is now at a tenuous crossroads after an eminently forgettable last few months.

As India embarked on a journey of transition, replete with excitement and promise, last summer through a five-Test tour of England, it was expected that the future would be shaped by two of the most luminous gems in the Indian firmament. Shubman Gill’s elevation to the Test captaincy was no surprise, even though he didn’t have a great deal of leadership experience at the First Class level. Gill had time on his side, he was even then one of the top batters whose place wasn’t under threat, and he had shown himself to be a quick learner. Thrust into the role of his deputy was a once-fearless force of nature who had been forced by circumstances to temper his exuberance, both because of extraneous pressure and owing to the fact that, having established himself as one of the seniors within the setup, he had to strike a fine balance between carefree and careless batsmanship.

Rishabh Pant’s rise as the vice-captain of the Test side was welcomed with as much breathless anticipation as Gill’s to the captaincy. Or Pant’s arrival at the batting crease, if you like. With the chunky left-hander, you still don’t know what to expect. Or maybe you do, but even so, what he does simply blows your mind. Pant isn’t reckless; he isn’t someone who doesn’t not put a price on his wicket, though from time to time, ‘Stupid, stupid, stupid’ will surface because that’s just who he is. Successive coaches, from Ravi Shastri to Rahul Dravid to now Gautam Gambhir, have given him the licence to be himself with the rider that he should be a little more selective, a little more game-aware, a little more respectful of situations and conditions.

It might have been tough for Gambhir to reconcile, for instance, to Pant’s extravagant aerial drive to his fifth delivery, from off-spinner Ramesh Mendis, that nestled in long-off’s hands at the NCC ground on Saturday in India’s only practice game, against a Sri Lanka Cricket XI. Most other batters would have been happy to play themselves in, get some circulation going, get a feel of the conditions, prepare conservatively for the two-Test series beginning in Galle next Saturday. But Pant isn’t most people, and that’s precisely what makes him the compelling attraction in front of the stumps that he has been since his Test debut in August 2018.

Pant fell just two balls after attempting a similar stroke that fell just beyond the reach of the backtracking mid-off fielder, compelling Mendis and skipper Sonal Dinusha to push Nishan Madushka back. Perhaps in a show of bravado, or more likely because he backed himself to middle the ball turning away from him and comfortably clear the fielder, Pant went through with the stroke only to put the ball up in the air for Madushka to complete a smart grab. Two runs from five deliveries isn’t what Pant, or the leadership group of Gill and Gambhir would have hoped for, but as mentioned earlier, India have been willing to accept the trade-off because when Pant gets going, the destruction he can wreak is beyond parallel.

Pant’s dalliance with the vice-captaincy didn’t last too long, the decision-makers arriving at the conclusion that he and Indian cricket would be better off without additional responsibilities being thrust on his shoulders. In his first sojourn as Gill’s deputy, Pant was a runaway success. His batting in England, on admittedly excellent tracks for batting, was a sight for sore eyes. While Gill was wooing and wowing the connoisseurs with his correctness and his silken stroke-making on his way to 754 extraordinary runs, Pant was at his innovative, unpredictable best without compromising on consistency. In Leeds during the first Test, he became the first Indian stumper to notch up twin hundreds in England, backed it up with 25 and 65 in the series-levelling win in Birmingham, produced efforts of 74 and 9 in the Lord’s loss and won himself a few million more fans by coming out to bat with a broken foot in the first innings and making a stirring 54 in the fourth Test in Manchester.

On-field heroism

The manner in which he contracted that injury, and the events that followed as he took on-field heroism to a different level, are archetypal Pant. The 28-year-old attempted a reverse against seamer Chris Woakes and only managed to play the ball on to his foot, carried off the field as that part of his body swelled up dramatically within seconds of the impact. When he came out to bat, hobbling and unable to put any weight on his right foot, he still found enough timing and power to smack fours – and a six – as he brought up his fifty to raucous applause and walked off to warm appreciation and genuine respect from England’s fielders.

That broken foot not only ended his England tour but also kept him out of the home series against West Indies in October. By this time, Pant was clearly only in the running for Test matches. His last ODI was in August 2024, his last T20I a week before that, both in Sri Lanka in Gambhir’s first assignment as Dravid’s successor. Sanju Samson and Ishan Kishan in the shorter white-ball format, and K.L. Rahul and Kishan in the 50-over version, have surged well clear in the wicketkeeper-batter stakes, which means the only canvas available to Pant, apart from the IPL which hasn’t been his happiest hunting ground, is the five-day spectacle.

Pant’s return to Test cricket, against South Africa in Kolkata in November, was anything but auspicious as India failed to hunt down 124 on an Eden minefield. Gill’s batting efforts in that Test were restricted to just three deliveries in the first innings as he retired hurt with a neck injury, an affliction that kept him out of the second Test in Guwahati and thrust Pant into the Test skipper’s role for the first time.

Hard times

It was a disastrous initiation; Pant himself played one of the most horrendous strokes of his career, a little after lunch on day three, then oversaw a 408-run hammering – India’s heaviest by runs in Test history. A few months later came a campaign of gigantic failure in the IPL when, under Pant, Lucknow Supergiants hurtled from one misadventure to another. Even before the tournament had ended, Pant had stepped down as captain, and a few weeks later, it was confirmed that the IPL’s most expensive player would return to his original franchise, Delhi Capitals, after taking a heavy pay cut.

Pant had a reasonably fruitful outing in the one-off Test against Afghanistan in New Chandigarh in June, with a somewhat restrained 81 in his, and India’s, only innings of the game that they bossed all the way through. By then, though, he had been replaced as vice-captain by K.L. Rahul, one of the few individuals to have captained the country in all three formats, all in a stand-in capacity. It was the clearest indication that Agarkar’s panel, if no one else, believed that Pant himself and the team as a whole would be better off if he was divested of official leadership responsibilities, though given his standing in the international circuit, Pant can’t not be a leader in his own right.

Now, Pant can focus on his primary disciplines without having to attend lengthy team discussions or the distraction of being pulled in different directions, an inevitable fallout of additional role thrusts. Behind the stumps, he is unconventional and unorthodox, more Mahendra Singh Dhoni than Syed Kirmani or Nayan Mongia. In front of it, he is evidently in a league of his own. Like he showed on Sunday in Colombo, he can stonewall if so required – though even he will admit that he took it too far – and switch gears around his stonewalling without warning. It is exactly this unpredictability that makes him such an irascible force, a revolving door that can exasperate as much as it can exhilarate.

Impressive numbers

Despite the presence in the squad, and possibly in the playing XI, of Dhruv Jurel, there is not even an artificial threat to Pant’s presence in the Test scheme of things. After all, we are talking about someone who averages 43.37 from an even 50 Tests, at a jaw-dropping strike-rate of 74.05 embellished by eight centuries and 19 fifties in 87 innings. These are numbers that would do several specialist batters proud – remember that Mike Atherton and the recently retired Ajinkya Rahane both averaged less than 40 – and yet, there is more to Pant. Such as 162 catches and 16 stumpings, and the very rare ability to change the course of even Test matches with two hours of unadulterated mayhem.

Six of Pant’s eight centuries have come away from home – four in England, and one each in Australia and South Africa – though like most of the rest of his colleagues, he hasn’t played a Test match in Sri Lanka yet. In some ways, the conditions there will be strikingly similar to India, but in others, they won’t be, especially when it comes to pace off the surface. Galle from Saturday, and the SSC ground the week thereafter, will ask questions of Pant that he hasn’t been asked too often in the past, but knowing him, he will find the answers. How he uses those answers, however, will make for fun viewing, as much as how much and how freely he is allowed to use them. There is no point asking Pant to bat like Ravindra Jadeja because, well, he wouldn’t be Pant then, would he? India need the most potent version of Pant to come to the fore. Only a really brave or stupid individual will bet against that eventuating.



Source link

]]>
Rishabh Pant takes big pay cut to rejoin Delhi Capitals for ₹15 crore; Kuldeep goes to LSG https://artifex.news/article71136829-ece/ Tue, 23 Jun 2026 09:23:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71136829-ece/ Read More “Rishabh Pant takes big pay cut to rejoin Delhi Capitals for ₹15 crore; Kuldeep goes to LSG” »

]]>

Rishabh Pant. File
| Photo Credit: Reuters

Rishabh Pant took a massive pay cut of ₹12 crore after two underwhelming seasons as the Lucknow Super Giants’ (LSG) captain and Delhi Capitals (DC) wrist spinner Kuldeep Yadav were involved in a high-profile trade off completed on Tuesday (June 23, 2026). Pant returns to the Delhi Capitals for ₹15 crore. The LSG had acquired his services for a whopping ₹27 crore, highest ever in the history of the league, in the mega auction ahead of IPL 2025.

Incidentally, LSG owner Sanjiv Goenka back in the day, had claimed that the deal with Pant will be a long-term one but only after two disappointing seasons, the LSG owners with tacit support from Australian heavy coaching staff (Justin Langer and Tom Moody) decided on releasing the flamboyant keeper-batter.

In an expected trade-off, left-arm wrist spinner Kuldeep Yadav went from the Capitals to LSG at his existing fee of ₹13.50 crore. Pant will now reconnect with the franchise for whom he had played 111 matches between 2016 and 2024, before leaving to take part in the auction. He was also their skipper between 2021 and 2024, guiding them in 43 matches. However, his stint with the LSG was well below par both in the leadership role as well as a wicketkeeper batter.

The Super Giants ended up at seventh on the IPL 2025 table with six wins and eight defeats, while IPL 2026 panned out to be even worse. The Pant-led outfit finished at the bottom of the 10-team league with a mere eight points from four wins and 10 losses.

As a batter, the left-hander made just 269 runs from 14 matches in 2025, while this season he amassed 312 runs with just one fifty. Kuldeep, who took 72 wickets in 65 matches for DC since joining them for IPL 2022 from KKR, also experienced a modest run in IPL 2026. The spinner could only take 10 wickets from 14 matches, while conceding runs at 10.30 an over.



Source link

]]>
India vs Afghanistan one-off Test in Mullanpur Day 2 updates https://artifex.news/article71072486-ece/ Sun, 07 Jun 2026 06:24:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71072486-ece/ Read More “India vs Afghanistan one-off Test in Mullanpur Day 2 updates” »

]]>

Rishabh Pant in action on day 2 of the one-off Test against Afghanistan in Mullanpur on June 7, 2026.
| Photo Credit: PTI

Rishabh Pant answered his critics in the best possible manner with a stroke-filled 81 as India were on course for a mammoth first innings score, reaching 475 for 6 against Afghanistan at lunch on the second day of the one-off Test, in Mullanpur on Sunday (June 7, 2026).

In-front of a sparse Sunday (June 7, 2026) crowd, Pant did play his signature strokes but also curbed his natural instinct to go after each delivery, treating each ball on its merit during his 121-ball knock that had six boundaries and three sixes.

He should have completed his century but debutant left-arm spinner Nangeyalia Kharote, who suddenly slowed the pace considerably. Pant charged down the track but couldn’t fully reach to the pitch of the delivery as the lofted hit ballooned up for a simple catch.

For Afghanistan, their IPL star Azmatullah Omarzai was distinctly unlucky. He was very impressive with the second new ball, beating the bat on a number of occasions without much luck.

In the first hour of second morning, Shubman Gill (126 off 177 balls) was dismissed by Mohammad Saleem (4/109 in 20 overs), who bowled a beauty to get rid of Indian skipper.

It was pitched on fuller length on off-stump channel drawing Gill forward and then there was a hint of outward movement taking the edge of his bat ending a 169-run stand.

Dhruv Jurel played a few beautiful shots square of the wicket but Saleem got one to reverse as Jurel decided to leave the ball on length only to find his off-stump pegged back.

However one dismissal that left the crowd high and dry was Pant’s as they were expecting some more fireworks from him once the spinners came into operation.

Going into the lunch break, Washington Sundar (14 batting) and debutant Manav Suthar (9 batting) were at the crease.

Scoreboard

India 1st innings: Yashasvi Jaiswal c Afsar Zazai b Mohammad Saleem 24 KL Rahul c Rahmanullah Gurbaz b Ziaur Rahman 100 Sai Sudharsan c Afsar Zazai b Mohammad Saleem 81 Shubman Gill c Afsar Zazai b Mohammad Saleem 126 Rishabh Pant c Azmatullah Omarzai b Hashmatullah Shahidi 81 Dhruv Jurel b Mohammad Saleem 19 Washington Sundar batting 14 Manav Suthar batting 9 Extras: (B-4 LB-12 NB-4 W-1) 21

Total: (For 6 wickets in 110 overs) 475

Fall of wickets: 1/41 2/180 3/247 4/416 5/452 6/456

Afghanistan bowling: Ziaur Rahman 22-2-87-1, Azmatullah Omarzai 19-4-54-0, Mohammad Saleem 20-2-109-4, Nangeyalia Kharote 21-0-96-0, Abdul Malik 7-0-43-0, Hashmatullah Shahidi 21-1-70-1.



Source link

]]>
IPL 2026 | PBKS assistant coach Haddin praises Shreyas’s appetite for the big moments https://artifex.news/article71017631-ece/ Sun, 24 May 2026 12:06:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71017631-ece/ Read More “IPL 2026 | PBKS assistant coach Haddin praises Shreyas’s appetite for the big moments” »

]]>

Punjab Kings skipper Shreyas Iyer in action during the Tata Indian Premier League (IPL) 2026, Twenty20 cricket match against Lucknow Super Giants at the Ekana Stadium in Lucknow on May 23, 2026.
| Photo Credit: SHASHI SHEKHAR KASHYAP

Shreyas Iyer picked the perfect evening to score his maiden Indian Premier League (IPL) ton as he powered Punjab Kings to a comfortable seven-wicket win over the Lucknow Super Giants.

“He’s a tremendous leader of many. He reads the game well,” said PBKS assistant coach Brad Haddin after the game.

“There are two main things that I think I enjoy most about him. One is his care for his players, and the other is his appetite for the big moment. He’s seen that tonight. He wanted to be the one to make the difference, and that’s what you want from your leaders, whether it’s for the IPL or for your country,” added the 48-year-old.

Haddin emphasised that the team’s overall execution in high-pressure situations has been a major focus behind the scenes.

“I think as any coaching staff, you have to identify moments where you need to get better, and that’s what we’ve done. A lot of the games we lost went to the last over and a couple to the last ball where we were close, but we probably weren’t identifying those big moments,” he said.

Lucknow Super Giants’ captain Rishabh Pant in action during the Tata Indian Premier League (IPL) 2026 Twenty20 cricket match against Punjab Kings at the Ekana Stadium in Lucknow on May 23, 2026.

Lucknow Super Giants’ captain Rishabh Pant in action during the Tata Indian Premier League (IPL) 2026 Twenty20 cricket match against Punjab Kings at the Ekana Stadium in Lucknow on May 23, 2026.
| Photo Credit:
SHASHI SHEKHAR KASHYAP

While one captain delivered when it mattered, his counterpart, Rishabh Pant, had little to show for his efforts — either on Saturday (May 23, 2026) or across a grueling season.

LSG’s Global Director of Cricket, Tom Moody, felt his captaincy and batting are correlated. “From a captaincy point of view, he’s found it challenging, obviously, and the results reflect that. And you have to wonder whether that is a pressure that is reflected with his performance with the bat,” he said.

“And certainly when it comes to the leadership of the franchise, it’s something that we’ll be giving some very serious consideration to what it looks like in the future,” he added.





Source link

]]>
IPL 2026 | There is light at the end of the tunnel: LSG’s bowling coach Arun https://artifex.news/article70935301-ece/ Sun, 03 May 2026 15:16:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70935301-ece/ Read More “IPL 2026 | There is light at the end of the tunnel: LSG’s bowling coach Arun” »

]]>

Lucknow Super Giants’ captain Rishabh Pant and Mumbai Indians’ Rohit Sharma during a the practice session ahead of their IPL 2026 match at the Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai on Sunday, May 3, 2026.
| Photo Credit: EMMANUAL YOGINI

The road to the IPL 2026 playoffs may seem distant for Lucknow Super Giants, which sits at the bottom of the table.

However, bowling coach Bharat Arun believes all is not lost yet. “There is light at the end of the tunnel. For us, there’s no other way. Every game is a knockout for us right from here,” Arun said.



Source link

]]>
IPL 2026, PBKS vs LSG | Priyansh-Connolly assault leaves Super Giants stunned https://artifex.news/article70881222-ece/ Sun, 19 Apr 2026 19:51:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70881222-ece/ Read More “IPL 2026, PBKS vs LSG | Priyansh-Connolly assault leaves Super Giants stunned” »

]]>

Punjab Kings’ Cooper Connolly and Prabhsimran Singh in action.
| Photo Credit: Reuters

Punjab Kings remained unbeaten and consolidated its position at the top of the IPL standings with a commanding 54-run win over Lucknow Super Giants at the Maharaja Yadavindra Singh Stadium on Sunday.

The PBKS bowlers rose in unison after Priyansh Arya and Cooper Connolly put on a blistering 182-run second-wicket partnership off just 80 balls to power the host to 254 for seven, the highest score of the season. In reply LSG was standing at 61, with Ayush Badoni’s promotion as opener working to an extent, before V. Vyshak dismissed him off the last ball of the PowerPlay.



Source link

]]>
Sorry, but the captain’s apology is now part of the game https://artifex.news/article70349318-ece/ Tue, 02 Dec 2025 19:10:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70349318-ece/ Read More “Sorry, but the captain’s apology is now part of the game” »

]]>

Captains apologising for team failures is approaching the status of a cliché in the modern game. It is undoubtedly a noble gesture, this acceptance of responsibility. It is both theatre and therapy. It is good PR, and a way of restoring the bond between team and fan, a reassurance that disappointment is shared, and nobody hurts alone.

Following England’s surrender in the opening Test of the Ashes series, skipper Ben Stokes said, “I could have been a lot better as captain. I wasn’t as clear as I normally am.” In India, Rishabh Pant said after losing to South Africa, “Sorry we couldn’t live up to expectations this time… we will work hard, regroup, refocus and reset to come back stronger and better as a team and individuals.”

The captain’s apology, like the switch hit or data analysis, is an aspect of contemporary cricket. England skipper Douglas Jardine was unrepentant after the Bodyline series in 1932-33, while his fast bowler Harold Larwood was asked to apologise by his cricket board. He didn’t, saying he was following his captain’s orders (as an aside, this is an example of cricket’s class system where batters are the aristocrats and bowlers the plebeians).

It is not unusual for defeated captains and players to feel they have let down their supporters, and resolve to do better the next time. This is human nature. Some articulate their thoughts, others save it for their memoir where time and ghostwriters allow them to settle on a happy choice of words.

Get it right

Nothing is permanent in sport. Not form or fortune, or indeed public affection. A captain who apologises too often becomes a caricature. One who refuses to apologise at all becomes a villain while one who apologises just enough is mythologised for taking responsibility. Captains have to get the ‘just enough’ right.

The more frequently captains apologise, however, the less we expect them to actually mean it. We subject the apology to the kind of analysis otherwise reserved for the captain’s footwork at the crease or his delivery stride. Was the tone suitably sombre? Did the captain place the burden of failure on his own shoulders while subtly suggesting that the bowlers might want to learn where the stumps are or the batters where their feet ought to be?

Will the apology soon become performative art, like those interviews where bowlers say profound things like putting the ball in the right areas? A few more apologising captains and we will get there, even if most fans can sniff out a merely ritual apology.

Do apologies actually change anything? The fan is usually willing to meet a captain halfway and forgive him. After all, anything else would be churlish. But in recent years, the apology is slipping from admission to routine, from candour to necessity. That’s not to say captains don’t feel bad or responsible after a defeat. Of course they do. And sometimes they break down publicly (most famously the Australian captain Kim Hughes before he announced his retirement in the middle of a series), or more often privately in the dressing room or at home.

Cultural housekeeping

Every captain who, after a defeat, apologises on television or in newspaper interviews or on social media (like Pant) is not speaking just to the present. Past collapses, overheated expectations, and a fan culture that swings between devotion and outrage are all rolled into what he says. Here, the apology is less an expression of personal guilt and more an act of cultural housekeeping — clearing the emotional debris so that everyone can move on to the next match without drowning in unresolved disappointment.

In the end, the apology is neither a moral requirement nor a PR necessity. It is simply the price of leadership in a world that craves certainty, that wants someone to take responsibility in sport because there is so little happening elsewhere in politics or business. Sport is always making up for what we lack in real life. The team may fail together, but the captain must fall alone.

It is lonely at the top, and gets lonelier when this happens. The captain needs to know that fans won’t turn away. An apology then is the bridge to empathy and reconnection.



Source link

]]>
Sorry, but the captain’s apology is now part of the game https://artifex.news/article70349318-ece-2/ Tue, 02 Dec 2025 19:10:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70349318-ece-2/ Read More “Sorry, but the captain’s apology is now part of the game” »

]]>

India’s stand-in captain Rishabh Pant at the toss before the start of the second Test cricket match between India and South Africa
| Photo Credit: PTI

Captains apologising for team failures is approaching the status of a cliché in the modern game. It is undoubtedly a noble gesture, this acceptance of responsibility. It is both theatre and therapy. It is good PR, and a way of restoring the bond between team and fan, a reassurance that disappointment is shared, and nobody hurts alone.

Following England’s surrender in the opening Test of the Ashes series, skipper Ben Stokes said, “I could have been a lot better as captain. I wasn’t as clear as I normally am.” In India, Rishabh Pant said after losing to South Africa, “Sorry we couldn’t live up to expectations this time… we will work hard, regroup, refocus and reset to come back stronger and better as a team and individuals.”

The captain’s apology, like the switch hit or data analysis, is an aspect of contemporary cricket. England skipper Douglas Jardine was unrepentant after the Bodyline series in 1932-33, while his fast bowler Harold Larwood was asked to apologise by his cricket board. He didn’t, saying he was following his captain’s orders (as an aside, this is an example of cricket’s class system where batters are the aristocrats and bowlers the plebeians).

It is not unusual for defeated captains and players to feel they have let down their supporters and resolve to do better the next time. This is human nature. Some articulate their thoughts, others save them for their memoir, where time and ghostwriters allow them to settle on a happy choice of words.

Get it right

Nothing is permanent in sport. Not form or fortune, or indeed public affection. A captain who apologises too often becomes a caricature. One who refuses to apologise at all becomes a villain, while one who apologises just enough is mythologised for taking responsibility. Captains have to get the ‘just enough’ right.

The more frequently captains apologise, however, the less we expect them to actually mean it. We subject the apology to the kind of analysis otherwise reserved for the captain’s footwork at the crease or his delivery stride. Was the tone suitably sombre? Did the captain place the burden of failure on his own shoulders while subtly suggesting that the bowlers might want to learn where the stumps are or the batters where their feet ought to be?

Will the apology soon become performative art, like those interviews where bowlers say profound things like putting the ball in the right areas? A few more apologising captains and we will get there, even if most fans can sniff out a merely ritual apology.

Do apologies actually change anything? The fan is usually willing to meet a captain halfway and forgive him. After all, anything else would be churlish. But in recent years, the apology is slipping from admission to routine, from candour to necessity. That’s not to say captains don’t feel bad or responsible after a defeat. Of course they do. And sometimes they break down publicly (most famously the Australian captain Kim Hughes before he announced his retirement in the middle of a series), or more often privately in the dressing room or at home.

Cultural housekeeping

Every captain who, after a defeat, apologises on television or in newspaper interviews or on social media (like Pant) is not speaking just to the present. Past collapses, overheated expectations, and a fan culture that swings between devotion and outrage are all rolled into what he says. Here, the apology is less an expression of personal guilt and more an act of cultural housekeeping — clearing the emotional debris so that everyone can move on to the next match without drowning in unresolved disappointment.

In the end, the apology is neither a moral requirement nor a PR necessity. It is simply the price of leadership in a world that craves certainty, that wants someone to take responsibility in sport because there is so little happening elsewhere in politics or business. Sport is always making up for what we lack in real life. The team may fail together, but the captain must fall alone.

It is lonely at the top, and gets lonelier when this happens. The captain needs to know that fans won’t turn away. An apology then is the bridge to empathy and reconnection.



Source link

]]>