European regulators are training their sights on smart glasses, as the wearable device equipped with high-definition cameras, ambient audio recording, and artificial intelligence is becoming common in Europe, blurring the lines between technological innovation and citizens’ privacy. Norway is taking the lead as its government prepares a proposal seeking a temporary ban on smart glasses in select public and sensitive locations. Led by Minister of Digitalisation and Public Governance Torgeir Micaelsen, the initiative pauses device usage in places where individuals expect personal privacy.

What does the proposal seek?

The temporary restrictions target places frequented by children, including schools, playgrounds, and youth clubs, healthcare facilities, fitness centres, locker rooms, public beaches, parks, museums, and concert venues. Crucially, the government is not proposing a ban on sales of the devices or prohibiting their use in private. Instead, the proposal is asking an expert committee to evaluate the technological challenges and formulate lasting legal frameworks. Oslo has already banned smart glasses across municipal schools.

The core argument behind Norway’s intervention centres on the lack of consent in public spaces. Traditional smartphones require users to visibly hold up a device to record video or snap photos, providing a clear signal to surrounding people. In contrast, smart glasses allow wearers to capture high-resolution imagery, record ambient audio, or live-stream video directly at the eye level without offering clear cues to bystanders.

This creates a surveillance system where citizens cannot easily determine whether they are being recorded. Privacy risks are especially acute in sensitive settings like changing rooms and medical clinics, or where unauthorised filming of children raises safety concerns. Furthermore, officials have highlighted risks surrounding real-time facial recognition software. When combined with AI eyewear, facial recognition could enable wearers to instantly identify strangers, access personal data, or facilitate doxxing. Norway’s proposed rules acknowledge that traditional privacy frameworks were not designed for head-worn, ambient recording technology.

Is any other country attempting a similar moratorium?

Norway is not alone in addressing privacy risks surrounding wearable devices, as a patchwork of regulations and venue-specific restrictions are in progress across Europe and North America.

In the Netherlands and Germany, eyewear retailer Hans Anders suspended sales of Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses across its Dutch and Belgian stores while awaiting regulatory clarity. Dutch lawmakers have discussed rules that await guidance from the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). Meanwhile, Hamburg is exploring regional restrictions.

The UK Cinema Association established guidelines restricting or prohibiting camera-equipped glasses in movie theatres to combat piracy and protect privacy of viewers. Additionally, courts in England and Wales require visitors to surrender smart glasses at security checkpoints.

In United States, several nightclubs, gyms, and courts in New York have implemented localised bans. California’s governor vetoed a legislation penalising covert recording in private spaces, but debate continues among state policymakers on next steps.

In Bangkok , smart glasses use is restricted in certain pubs and public places.

How are manufacturers of smart glasses adapting to this regulatory landscape?

To address privacy concerns, hardware manufacturers have built technical safeguards into current-generation devices. Devices such as Ray-Ban Meta glasses feature a white light-emitting diode (LED) on the frame beside the lens. The LED blinks when capturing photos and stays lit continuously during video recording.

Manufacturers have deployed firmware updates that detect if the LED indicator is covered or obstructed. If light obstruction is detected, the system automatically disables the camera’s functionality. Devices enforce caps on continuous recording duration and play audible shutter sounds when taking photos.

But privacy advocates have said that small LED lights remain difficult to spot in bright sunlit conditions or crowded environments, rendering hardware safeguards insufficient for complete bystander protection.

How will the moratorium impact device sales?

Although Norway’s proposal focuses on restricting device usage rather than banning sales, the commercial impact on manufacturers could be substantial. The primary selling point of smart glasses is their seamless integration into daily public life. Restricting their use in public spaces like parks, beaches, shopping centres, and fitness clubs undermine their utility, rendering a versatile daily use accessory into a device restricted to home use.

In addition, voluntary retail suspensions such as the sales halt by Hans Anders, create immediate revenue hits in the European market. Regulatory uncertainty across different regions introduces consumer hesitation, discouraging buyers who worry about purchasing expensive hardware that might soon face usage restrictions in public.

How might smart glass makers tweak functionality?

To comply with evolving privacy standards and maintain consumer trust, manufacturers may likely re-engineer both hardware and software features by implementing larger, brighter, or colour-shifting LED indicators, alongside louder audio signals that cannot be silenced.

Software updates could incorporate AI-driven face-blurring and audio pitch modification, redacting bystander identities before footage is saved or streamed. Smart glasses could utilise GPS data to automatically disable recording capabilities when entering designated privacy zones like schools, hospitals, or locker rooms. Manufacturers can explicitly block facial recognition software and APIs to prevent real-time profiling in public spaces.

Companies are expanding lines to include audio-focused smart glasses without cameras (such as Ray-Ban Meta Audio), catering to users who want AI features without privacy concerns.

Published – October 07, 2026 11:51 am IST

Data and AI experts take part at a session, titled ‘Data Privacy as a Pillar of Resilience: Building Trust in a Digital Age’, at The Hindu Tech Summit 2026 in Chennai on Friday
| Photo Credit: B. Velankanni Raj

James Anderson, a plumber from Burnley known as “Britain’s kindest plumber,” is facing accusations of fabricating heartwarming stories to solicit donations for his charity, Depher (Disabled and Elderly, Plumbing and Heating Emergency Response), according to a BBC investigation.

The BBC alleges that Anderson has repeatedly used photos of the same dead woman in social media posts promoting Depher’s work. Additionally, the investigation claims Anderson filmed and shared videos and images of a vulnerable customer in his nineties, publicly disclosing the man’s sexuality despite his reported pleas against being filmed for social media. The unnamed customer reportedly told the BBC, “God no,” when asked for consent.

Depher claims to use donations for various purposes, including free food deliveries, covering gas and electricity bills, offering pro bono plumbing services, and even assisting with funeral costs for past clients. Anderson’s acts of charity gained significant public attention, attracting financial backing from celebrities like Hugh Grant and Lily Allen. He even secured an appearance on ITV’s “This Morning” to promote his work.

However, the BBC investigation raises questions about the legitimacy of Depher’s activities. The alleged misuse of photos and the disregard for a customer’s privacy cast a shadow on Anderson’s methods.

Anderson prevented one elderly woman from killing herself, the firm claimed. In fact, she had died years earlier.

He denied some of the BBC‘s allegations but admitted, “I’ve made mistakes.”

Since 2019, Depher has posted hundreds of stories about acts of kindness it says it has carried out.

The social media stories made him a viral sensation during the UK’s cost-of-living crisis and brought in at least 2 million pounds in donations, according to a BBC analysis of his company’s accounts.