Nobel Prize 2025 – Artifex.News https://artifex.news Stay Connected. Stay Informed. Wed, 15 Oct 2025 07:41:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 https://artifex.news/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/cropped-Artifex-Round-32x32.png Nobel Prize 2025 – Artifex.News https://artifex.news 32 32 Science for all Curiosity-driven research in an unequal world https://artifex.news/article70165905-ece/ Wed, 15 Oct 2025 07:41:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70165905-ece/ Read More “Science for all Curiosity-driven research in an unequal world” »

]]>

(This article forms a part of the Science for All newsletter that takes the jargon out of science and puts the fun in! Subscribe now!)

There is ample evidence that the big leaps science achieves from time to time are often built on scientists asking simple questions, driven solely by their curiosity and not because they wanted to develop a specific technology.

In a widely circulated piece in The New York Times, the journalist Katrina Miller wrote how one of the physics Nobel laureates this year, John Clarke, probably did not know how his work on macroscopic quantum tunnelling would lead to contemporary quantum computers. It goes somewhat similarly for the medicine and chemistry prize laureates as well. Ms. Miller goes on to cite the examples of Agnes Pockels, “whose fascination with the soap bubbles made while washing dishes laid the groundwork for the field of nanotechnology”, and “Isaac Newton, whose musings about an apple falling from a tree inspired a first theory of gravity, a bedrock that eventually took humans to space.”

Such examples also show that we can’t always know what applications will come up tomorrow by asking and answering some questions today. The deeper idea is that the more we know about the universe, the more we will know what to do with that knowledge.

But like all important matters today, there is at least another side to this coin (there are in fact several sides but let’s stick to just two here).

Science today is an integral part of society. It has got there quickly as well. Just in the last two centuries, but especially since the late 1800s, science has become much more organised, more specialised, and — importantly — more expensive. It was expensive in the 18th and 19th centuries, too, but it is even more so today. That it has become more organised is also important because that played an important part in quelling many superstitious beliefs and paving the way for scientific thinking while allowing scientists to make more and more intricate discoveries.

The scientific enterprise of the 21st century operates like an industry, with its own inputs and outputs, planning, budgeting, construction, recruiting and training labour, requiring policies and laws, and so on. While there are many laudable pockets of low-cost science, it is by and large a resource-intensive enterprise — and that means the countries that fund it need to think about where those resources will come from and how best to use them.

Now, there is a refrain in not-so-wealthy-but-still-quite-wealthy countries like India that there isn’t enough money to fund everything. Based on following science administration and public spending in India for over a decade, I think this claim is false: India has lots of money; what’s often lacking is the political will and the vision to fund specific enterprises over others.

But even after accounting for this argument, or perhaps because of it, many experts have said that there is a credible need for the scientific enterprise to thoroughly justify the way it spends public money. And this is the other side of the coin where curiosity-driven research presents a problem: it often cannot say what benefits it will yield in future, and developing and distributing those benefits often takes time (and more resources).

As a result, those experts have continued, there is a case to be made that India — with its vast appetite for technological solutions to improve working conditions and labour productivity in so many sectors — can’t afford curiosity-driven research alone and that it should provide special incentives for scientists and engineers to pursue research in particular areas. As any researcher will attest, this is also a long and difficult road, equally laden with the risk of dead-ends, but in many ways it’s one that administrators have had an easier time justifying and providing (some) funding for.

I’m a firm believer in the virtues of curiosity-driven research. Despite my difficult relationship with the Nobel Prizes, I’m often quite excited about the scientific work they reward. I’m particularly fond of the 2016 chemistry prize, “for the design and synthesis of molecular machines”, which involved a not insignificant amount of playful thinking. One of the laureates who shared this prize, J. Fraser Stoddart, had written in a 2005 essay:

“It is amazing how something that was difficult to do in the beginning will surely become easy to do in the event of its having been done. The Borromean rings [which the laureates spent some time and effort making, in the process advancing chemistry] have captured our imagination simply because of their sheer beauty. What will they be good for? Something for sure, and we still have the excitement of finding out what that something might be. And so the story goes on…”

His words illustrate the power of curiosity-driven research to change the world, even reshape it. It’s the same power a child wields when she asks questions like “do people in Antarctica stand upside down?” or, as a friend’s daughter recently asked me, “why does poop smell so bad?”.

Despite my own inclinations, I don’t think we can afford to ignore or dismiss the need for research that is more tailored to the needs of particular sectors. Both paradigms have their problems even as no country can afford to adopt just one or the other in its pursuit of technological development. For example, as the work of this year’s winners of the special Nobel Prize for economics says, every country needs to meet certain conditions for its scientific output to translate to technological wealth followed by economic growth. If these conditions are not met, simply increasing the scientific output won’t help; in fact it could become counterproductive.

So while it’s heartening to tout the virtues of doing science led only by the guiding light of curiosity, it’s important to remember that there’s a bigger world out there and that science is a part of it.

From the Science pages

Question Corner

Why do we feel sleepy after a heavy meal? Find out here

Flora and fauna

Published – October 15, 2025 01:11 pm IST



Source link

]]>
From refugee to Nobel: Yaghi hails science’s ‘equalising force’ https://artifex.news/article70140585-ece/ Wed, 08 Oct 2025 15:26:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70140585-ece/ Read More “From refugee to Nobel: Yaghi hails science’s ‘equalising force’” »

]]>

This undated image provided by the University of California, Berkeley, shows Omar Yaghi, who was one of three scientists awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
| Photo Credit: AP

Born into a family of Palestinian refugees in Jordan with little schooling, Nobel chemistry laureate Omar Yaghi on Wednesday (October 8, 2025) paid tribute to science’s “equalising force”.

Prof. Yaghi, a Jordanian-American, won the 2025 prize together with Susumu Kitagawa of Japan and U.K.-born Richard Robson for their groundbreaking discoveries on metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), whose uses include capturing carbon dioxide and harvesting water from desert air.

“I grew up in a very humble home. We were a dozen of us in one small room, sharing it with the cattle that we used to raise,” he told the Nobel Foundation in an interview after learning he had won the prestigious prize.

Their home had no electricity or running water. His father had only finished sixth grade and his mother could neither read nor write.

Born in 1965, he spent his childhood in Amman, in Jordan, before leaving for the United States at the age of 15, on the advice of his stern father.

Prof. Yaghi first discovered molecular structures in a book when he was 10 years old, after sneaking into the usually locked school library.

His eyes were drawn to the “unintelligible but captivating” images.

“It’s quite a journey,” he mused — and one that science enabled him to make, he said.

“Science is the greatest equalising force in the world,” Prof. Yaghi said.

“Smart people, talented people, skilled people exist everywhere. That’s why we really should focus on unleashing their potential through providing them with opportunity.”

His research group succeeded in extracting water from desert air in Arizona.

“I started at Arizona State University, my independent career and my dream was to publish at least one paper that receives 100 citations,” he recalled.

“Now my students say that our group has garnered over 250,000 citations.”

“The beauty of chemistry is that if you learn how to control matter on the atomic and molecular level, well, the potential is great,” he said.

“We opened a gold mine in that way and the field grew,” he said.



Source link

]]>
Trio win Chemistry Nobel 2025 for metal-organic frameworks https://artifex.news/article70138556-ece/ Wed, 08 Oct 2025 09:51:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70138556-ece/ Read More “Trio win Chemistry Nobel 2025 for metal-organic frameworks” »

]]>

Susumu Kitagawa (Japan), Richard Robson (UK), Omar M. Yaghi (USA). Image courtesy: X/@NobelPrize (©Johan Jarnestad/The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences)

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry is being awarded to Susumu Kitagawa, Richard Robson and Omar M. Yaghi “for the development of metal–organic frameworks.,” the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences announced on Wednesday (October 8, 2025).

The Nobel Prize laureates in chemistry 2025 have created molecular constructions with large spaces through which gases and other chemicals can flow. These constructions, metal-organic frameworks, can be used to harvest water from desert air, capture carbon dioxide, store toxic gases or catalyse chemical reactions.

 In 1989, Richard Robson tested utilising the inherent properties of atoms in a new way by combining positively charged copper ions with a four-armed molecule; this had a chemical group that was attracted to copper ions at the end of each arm. Though the molecular construction had potential, it was unstable and collapsed easily.

However, Susumu Kitagawa and Omar Yaghi provided this building method with a firm foundation. Kitagawa showed that gases can flow in and out of the constructions and predicted that MOFs could be made flexible. Yaghi created a very stable MOF and showed that it can be modified using rational design, giving it new and desirable properties.

The 2024 Nobel Prize for chemistry was shared by David Baker “for computational protein design” along with Demis Hassabis and John Jumper “for protein structure prediction,”

Nobel Prize announcements kicked off on Monday (October 6, 2025) with the Prize for Physiology or Medicine. Three scientists – Mary E. Brunkow, Fred Ramsdell, and Shimon Sakaguchi shared the Medicine Nobel for identifying the immune system’s security guards, regulatory T cells. Physics Nobel, announced on Tuesday (October 7), was awarded to John Clarke, Michel Devoret, and John Martini for building device showing ‘quantum tunnelling’.

The winners of the Literature, Peace and Economic Sciences Prize will be declared on October 9, October 10, and October 13 respectively.

The prizes carry a cash award of 11 million Swedish kronor (approximately ₹1.03 crore) and will be awarded on December 10.

The Nobel Prize was created by Swedish inventor Alfred Nobel, who in his will dictated that his estate should be used to fund “prizes to those who, during the preceding year, have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind”.



Source link

]]>
2025 Nobel Prize in Physics goes to three scientists for discovery of macroscopic quantum mechanical tunnelling https://artifex.news/article70133992-ece/ Tue, 07 Oct 2025 09:50:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70133992-ece/ Read More “2025 Nobel Prize in Physics goes to three scientists for discovery of macroscopic quantum mechanical tunnelling” »

]]>

John Clarke (UK), Michel H. Devoret (France) and John M. Martinis (US) win Nobel physics prize
| Photo Credit:  ©Johan Jarnestad/The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

The Nobel Prize in Physics is being awarded to John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret and John M. Martinis “for the discovery of macroscopic quantum mechanical tunnelling and energy quantisation in an electric circuit.,” the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences announced in Stockhom on Tuesday (October 7, 2025).

“It is wonderful to be able to celebrate the way that century-old quantum mechanics continually offers new surprises. It is also enormously useful, as quantum mechanics is the foundation of all digital technology,” saids Olle Eriksson, Chair of the Nobel Committee for Physics.

The transistors in computer microchips are one example of the established quantum technology that surrounds us. This year’s Nobel Prize in Physics has provided opportunities for developing the next generation of quantum technology, including quantum cryptography, quantum computers, and quantum sensors, the Nobel Prize committee said in a media release.

John J. Hopfield and Geoffrey Hinton were jointly awarded the Physics Nobel last year “for foundational discoveries and inventions that enable machine learning with artificial neural networks.”

Nobel Prize announcements kicked off on Monday (October 7, 2025) with the Prize for Physiology or Medicine. Three scientists — Mary E. Brunkow, Fred Ramsdell, and Shimon Sakaguchi — shared the Medicine Nobel for identifying the immune system’s security guards, regulatory T cells. The winners for Chemistry will be announced on Wednesday (October 8), while the winners of the Literature, Peace and Economic Sciences Prize will be declared on October 9, October 10, and October 13 respectively.

The prizes carry a cash award of 11 million Swedish kronor (approximately ₹1.03 crore) and will be awarded on December 10.

The Nobel Prize was created by Swedish inventor Alfred Nobel, who in his will dictated that his estate should be used to fund “prizes to those who, during the preceding year, have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind”.



Source link

]]>
Who are the winners of the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine? https://artifex.news/article70131185-ece/ Mon, 06 Oct 2025 12:14:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70131185-ece/ Read More “Who are the winners of the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine?” »

]]>

Mary E. Brunkow (US), Fred Ramsdell (US) and Shimon Sakaguchi (Japan) win Nobel medicine prize. | Photo Credit: Courtesy: https://www.nobelprize.org/

The 2025 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded to Mary E. Brunkow, Fred Ramsdell, and Shimon Sakaguchi for their work on how immune systems work in determining what should be attacked or protected. The prize was announced at the Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden, on Monday (October 6, 2025).

What is the research about?

The 2025 winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine concerns the peripheral immune tolerance.

The peripheral immune system of the body includes the components of the immune system outside the central nervous system, which is made up of the brain and the spinal cord. The prize-winning research identifies regulatory T (Treg) cells, which prevent immune cells from attacking the host body itself.

Shimon Sakaguchi

The primary work that led to this discovery was done by Japanese immunologist Shimon Sakaguchi. Currently at the Osaka University in Japan, 74-year-old Sakaguchi earned his Doctor of Medicine degree from Kyoto University in 1983, although he reportedly began researching Treg cells first in 1979.

T-cells, in general, help the immune system fight hostile bodies and keep people disease-free. There are different kinds of these cells, specialised to perform different tasks. These cells are identified by proteins on their surfaces.

Sakaguchi identified the Treg cells in 1995. Instead of attacking foreign bodies, these cells help calm the immune system so that it doesn’t end up attacking the host itself or causing autoimmune diseases.

Other researchers in the field, however, wanted more proof of the existence of Treg cells.

Sakaguchi also won the Canada Gairdner Award in 2015 for the same discovery. He was previously also a Lucille P. Marky scholar which allowed him to pursue biomedical research in the US.

Mary Brunkow and Fred Ramsdell

Mary Brunkow holds a PhD in molecular biology from Princeton University. She is currently a senior program manager at the Institute for Systems Biology in Seattle, US.

Fred Ramsdell is a scientific advisor at Sonoma Biotherapeutics in Bainbridge island, Washington. He holds a PhD in immunology from the University of California, Los Angeles.

After Sakaguchi’s initial work in the field of Treg cells, Brunkow and Ramsdell got interested in a mutation in the male scurfy mouse strain, which was being attacked by T-cells, thus destroying its own tissues. Both Brunkow and Ramsdell worked at the Celltech Chiroscience biotech company in Bothell, Washington, at the time, and tried to find the cause of this disease with the idea of studying how autoimmune diseases arise.



Source link

]]>
Who are the winners of the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine? https://artifex.news/article70131185-ece-2/ Mon, 06 Oct 2025 12:14:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70131185-ece-2/ Read More “Who are the winners of the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine?” »

]]>

Mary E Brunkow, Fred Ramsdell and Shimon Sakaguchi are awarded this year’s Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology at Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden, on October 6, 2025.
| Photo Credit: Reuters

The 2025 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded to Mary E. Brunkow, Fred Ramsdell, and Shimon Sakaguchi for their work on how immune systems work in determining what should be attacked or protected. The prize was announced at the Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden, on Monday (October 6, 2025).

What is the research about?

The 2025 winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine concerns the peripheral immune tolerance.

The peripheral immune system of the body includes the components of the immune system outside the central nervous system, which is made up of the brain and the spinal cord. The prize-winning research identifies regulatory T (Treg) cells, which prevent immune cells from attacking the host body itself.

Shimon Sakaguchi

The primary work that led to this discovery was done by Japanese immunologist Shimon Sakaguchi. Currently at the Osaka University in Japan, 74-year-old Sakaguchi earned his Doctor of Medicine degree from Kyoto University in 1983, although he reportedly began researching Treg cells first in 1979.

T-cells, in general, help the immune system fight hostile bodies and keep people disease-free. There are different kinds of these cells, specialised to perform different tasks. These cells are identified by proteins on their surfaces.

Sakaguchi identified the Treg cells in 1995. Instead of attacking foreign bodies, these cells help calm the immune system so that it doesn’t end up attacking the host itself or causing autoimmune diseases.

Other researchers in the field, however, wanted more proof of the existence of Treg cells.

Sakaguchi also won the Canada Gairdner Award in 2015 for the same discovery. He was previously also a Lucille P. Marky scholar which allowed him to pursue biomedical research in the US.

Mary Brunkow and Fred Ramsdell

Mary Brunkow holds a PhD in molecular biology from Princeton University. She is currently a senior program manager at the Institute for Systems Biology in Seattle, US.

Fred Ramsdell is a scientific advisor at Sonoma Biotherapeutics in Bainbridge island, Washington. He holds a PhD in immunology from the University of California, Los Angeles.

After Sakaguchi’s initial work in the field of Treg cells, Brunkow and Ramsdell got interested in a mutation in the male scurfy mouse strain, which was being attacked by T-cells, thus destroying its own tissues. Both Brunkow and Ramsdell worked at the Celltech Chiroscience biotech company in Bothell, Washington, at the time, and tried to find the cause of this disease with the idea of studying how autoimmune diseases arise.



Source link

]]>