National Health Accounts – Artifex.News https://artifex.news Stay Connected. Stay Informed. Mon, 03 Feb 2025 01:59:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 https://artifex.news/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cropped-cropped-app-logo-32x32.png National Health Accounts – Artifex.News https://artifex.news 32 32 Making health system push economic growth: a case of missed opportunity https://artifex.news/article69172629-ece/ Mon, 03 Feb 2025 01:59:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article69172629-ece/ Read More “Making health system push economic growth: a case of missed opportunity” »

]]>

To make our economy grow, we need to push private consumption. To increase private consumption, people need more disposable income. For that, one route is to reduce the money an ordinary person spends on basics such as health and education. The Union Budget 2025-26 seems to have missed this opportunity. We need to focus on ensuring higher uptake of public health facilities. A third-term government with stability and continuity can take higher risks to push for bolder programmes and structural changes. But the Budget does not seem to indicate this direction. It is business as usual.

The key department within the Health ministry, the Department of Health and Family Welfare (DoHFW), which runs most of the critical public health programmes, saw a meagre 11% increase in its annual Budget Estimates (BE) from last fiscal year’s (FY25) Revised Estimates (RE). This year’s increase has been the lowest in three years. When we compare what has been allocated in a given year versus what was fully spent by the department in the previous year, the limited financial envelop of the department becomes even more stark. We have data on actual spends by the DoHFW till 2023. In 2023, the actual spend was ₹80,292 crore and in 2024 the RE to the DoHFW was a mere 7.8% higher at ₹86,582 crore. Since 2021, a rise in allocations when compared with actual spends in the previous years has been between 6% and 8% only. This excludes the year 2022-23 when the money available to DoHFW fell by 7% from the actual spending the previous year in 2021-22.

Within health, the focus remains on the national level insurance programme- the Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY), for which allocations have risen by 24% from last year’s RE. And a 41% higher allocation this year from actual usage in 2023, which is the latest data available. For the National Health Mission (NHM), the increase in allocations from 2024 (RE) to this year’s Budget is a meagre 3.4%. The urban component within NHM has increased allocation from last year (2024) Budget (RE) by a mere 4.3%. This is particularly worrying for NHM. It’s a national level programme covering rural and urban health. With slowing economic growth, its implications for jobs and wages, under financed and weak health system for rural and urban poor creates perfect conditions for a health crisis, and could further pull-down economic growth. What is most interesting about the NHM is that it is one of the government’s programmes that has been spending more than what has been estimated in that year every year since 2015, except in 2021- the pandemic year, when allocations were higher than the spends. The allocation is increased in the next year when compared with the actual spend in the previous one but the increase is a paltry amount at its best.

Insurance programmes increase the availability of hospital options by roping in private facilities. But by its nature, in an insurance-led health system, the focus remains on secondary and tertiary care and curative services. A public health system, on the other hand, provides primary care — basic illnesses, routine health check-ups, etc. and also preventive and proactive services which are not covered by insurance. Private hospitals can become options for eye surgery and with insurance, they become easily accessible to the poor but all other ailments need primary care, which isn’t in the ambit of insurance.

The Budget does not reveal numbers for primary care services, which it has been providing through the Health and Wellness Centres, but the NHM and NUHM estimates reveal that there haven’t been any meaningful rise in allocations.

Close to 50% of our health care is provided by the private sector, according to the most recent National Family Health Survey 5 data (2019-2021). At the primary care level, only 10% visit a government PHC in rural areas. In urban areas, this further reduces to 5%. But, there is immense pent up health demands, which insurance does not cover. Taking the example of urban primary care in parts of Rajasthan. When compared with hospitals, private clinics, etc. per day UPHC visits are very low, they exceed the capacities of many top class UPHCs. In places like Jaipur, Udaipur and Ajmer in Rajasthan, per day UPHC load goes up to 250 for many of the well-functioning, well-located accessible UPHCs. It appears that even though UPHCs are fulfilling a very small load of health services, they are providing a lot despite limited capacity.

But in many cases, the challenge is the lack of facilities. Karnataka, for example, has a 38% UPHC deficit. There are similar deficits of staff including specialists, Auxiliary Nurse-Midwifes, pharmacists, health programmes mangers nationwide. Uptake of facilities falls when staff is not available, or, if the time per visit is long.

While our out-of-pocket expense (OOPE) has fallen from 63% in 2014 to 39.4% in FY2021-22 as per the most recent available data provided in the National Health Accounts (NHA), it still remains high by global standards. According to a WHO’s global health expenditure database, India remains in the category of countries with the second highest range of OOPE in the world at 46% in 2022.

Low overall allocations to health when matched with a focus on insurance also means that we are really excluding the ‘middle classes’ – the ones whose consumption can fuel growth and the ones who need the extra spending capacity. But these are the classes who are not covered by the insurance programmes and rely on the public system to reduce health care expenses, particularly in urban India. And it’s this stratum, which will be much affected by the lukewarm Budget allocations to health.

As the year unfolds, the government will be well advised to revisit its health allocations and redirect its focus on the NHM. Within this, a strong focus on primary care, both for improving infrastructure and increasing staff hiring is fundamental to raising uptake and reducing time to care.

An economic growth led by a strong public health sector will be a sustained and rooted one, resistant to external shocks and responsive to new challenges. It’s time the Budget priorities align with this ideal.

(The writer is Fellow, Centre for Social and Economic Progress (CSEP). The views expressed are personal.)



Source link

]]>
Primary healthcare registers rise in expenditure with reduction in out-of-pocket treatment cost: Economic Survey https://artifex.news/article68432867-ece/ Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:20:37 +0000 https://artifex.news/article68432867-ece/ Read More “Primary healthcare registers rise in expenditure with reduction in out-of-pocket treatment cost: Economic Survey” »

]]>

A pharmacist arranges stocked medicines at a Jan Aushadhi Pharmacy in Tiruchi, Tamil Nadu.
| Photo Credit: M. SRINATH

The Economic Survey 2023-2024 highlights that the latest National Health Accounts (NHA) estimates show an increase in the share of Government Health Expenditure (GHE) in the total GDP as well as the share of GHE in Total Health Expenditure (THE).

The data compiled in the latest NHA estimates are for financial year 2019-20 (FY20).

The Survey tabled by Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in Parliament on Monday points out that over the years, the share of primary healthcare expenditure has increased from 51.3% of GHE in FY15 to 55.9% of GHE in FY20. The share of primary and secondary care in GHE rose from 73.2% in FY15 to 85.5% in FY20.

On the other hand, the share of primary and secondary care in private health expenditure has declined from 83% to 73.7% during the same period, which the Survey attributes to rising tertiary disease burden and utilisation of government facilities for primary healthcare.

The Survey also notes a significant increase in the social security expenditure on health, which grew from 5.7% in FY15 to 9.3% in FY20. There was also a decline in out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) as a percentage of THE between FY15 and FY20.

Consequent to these developments, the Survey underscores improvements in key health indicators such as Infant Mortality Rate (IMR), declining from 39 per 1,000 live births in 2013 to 28 per 1,000 live births in 2020, and Maternal Mortality Rate (MMR) declining from 167 per lakh live births in 2014 to 97 per lakh live births in 2020.

It has further said that the Union government is working towards ensuring sound health and well-being of people of all ages through preventive and promotive healthcare. It listed out various schemes including Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Aarogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY), PM Jan Aushadhi Kendras, AMRIT (Affordable Medicines and Reliable Implants for Treatment), etc. being brought in to help the public.



Source link

]]>