Mumbai Press Club – Artifex.News https://artifex.news Stay Connected. Stay Informed. Wed, 15 Jul 2026 03:25:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3 https://artifex.news/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cropped-cropped-app-logo-32x32.png Mumbai Press Club – Artifex.News https://artifex.news 32 32 Bombay High Court refuses interim relief to journalist expelled from Mumbai Press Club over Bhima-Koregaon meeting https://artifex.news/article71221389-ecerand29/ Wed, 15 Jul 2026 03:25:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71221389-ecerand29/ Read More “Bombay High Court refuses interim relief to journalist expelled from Mumbai Press Club over Bhima-Koregaon meeting” »

]]>

The Bombay High Court has dismissed an interim application filed by journalist Gurbir Singh, who was expelled from the Mumbai Press Club for six years for facilitating a meeting of Bhima-Koregaon case accused persons within the club premises.

Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar rejected the plea for interim stay, observing that the managing committee’s decision was neither arbitrary nor perverse, and the trial court’s refusal to grant injunction was a plausible view based on available material.

The controversy dates back to January 19, 2026, when Mr. Singh along with two other members organised a meeting at the club where four accused in the 2018 Bhima-Koregaon case were invited. The meeting allegedly facilitated the accused persons to gather, potentially violating their bail conditions.

Following the incident, the club issued a show-cause notice on February 22, 2026. After considering Mr. Singh’s reply, the managing committee constituted a three-member enquiry committee, which submitted its report on April 25, 2026, holding Mr. Singh responsible for facilitating the gathering. The managing committee resolved to expel Mr. Singh and two others for six years effective April 27, 2026.

Mr. Singh challenged the expulsion through a civil suit and sought interim stay, which was dismissed by the trial court on July 1, 2026.

Arguing for Mr. Singh, counsel submitted that the expulsion violated the club’s bye-laws under Article 11(d) and principles of natural justice, as documents demanded were not provided.

However, the court noted that Mr. Singh had participated in the enquiry and was given adequate opportunity to defend himself. The court observed that the National Investigation Agency had even filed an application for cancellation of bail based on the meeting.

Citing the Supreme Court’s judgment in T.P. Daver vs. Lodge Victoria, the court acknowledged that civil courts have limited jurisdiction in club matters and can interfere only if the body acts without jurisdiction, in bad faith, or violates natural justice. The court found none of these grounds made out.

“The impugned order is not at all perverse warranting interference on any count,” Justice Khubalkar held, while clarifying that observations were made only for the interim application.



Source link

]]>
Mumbai Press Club’s Response After Rahul Gandhi Calls Journalists “Slaves” https://artifex.news/mumbai-press-club-rahul-gandhi-high-handed-mumbai-press-club-flags-rahul-gandhis-remark-on-journalists-7047654rand29/ Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:27:17 +0000 https://artifex.news/mumbai-press-club-rahul-gandhi-high-handed-mumbai-press-club-flags-rahul-gandhis-remark-on-journalists-7047654rand29/ Read More “Mumbai Press Club’s Response After Rahul Gandhi Calls Journalists “Slaves”” »

]]>

Rahul Gandhi made the remark during an election rally in Maharashtra’s Nashik

New Delhi:

The Mumbai Press Club has criticised Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for his “high-handed attitude towards working journalists” and said his repeated “targeting of journalists” raises concerns about “how his party might approach the press if it were to return to power”.

The media body’s strong remarks came after Mr Gandhi pointed to some reporters at an election rally in Maharashtra and called them “slaves of their owners”. “It is not their fault. I like them. They have to work, draw salaries, fund their children’s education, get food on the table, so they cannot do anything against their owners,” he said.

The Mumbai Press Club said that the remarks were “cloaked in concern” for the plight of journalists, but his comments carried “a tone of condescension”. It added that the working conditions of journalists today are a result of contractualisation partly driven by the policies of past Congress governments.

“Has Mr Gandhi ever reflected on the root causes of the challenges faced by working journalists in India and the state of journalism as a whole? The precarious conditions of journalists today stem largely from rampant contractualisation, driven in part by the neoliberal policies introduced by the Congress-led government in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Until then, journalists had fought for and secured significant rights, including unionization and better working conditions. Contractualisation, however, allowed monopoly media houses to sack journalists at will, weakening unions and leaving journalists vulnerable,” it said in a post on X.

“If Mr. Gandhi truly wishes to address the plight of journalists, perhaps he should redirect his critique toward the media owners and the structural issues within the industry. The ever-present threat of dismissal, combined with an oversupply of unemployed and underemployed journalists, makes it unrealistic to expect working journalists to rebel against the system at great personal risk,” the Mumbai Press Club added.

“While we acknowledge the immense challenges posed by the current government’s authoritarian tendencies toward the media, it is equally concerning to witness Mr Gandhi’s repeated targeting of journalists. His rhetoric raises legitimate concerns about how his party might approach the press if it were to return to power. If Prime Minister Narendra Modi is rightly criticised for avoiding open press conferences, Mr Gandhi’s recurrent mockery and derision of journalists also deserve rebuke,” it said.

The Mumbai Press Club, the statement said, has always stood against the violation of journalists’ rights, whether by ruling parties, media owners, or other forces. “We, therefore, view the high-handed approach of the Leader of the Opposition toward working journalists as a matter of serious concern. Constructive dialogue and accountability, not dismissive remarks, are what the media-and democracy-deserve,” it said.





Source link

]]>