middle east war – Artifex.News https://artifex.news Stay Connected. Stay Informed. Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:17:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1 https://artifex.news/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cropped-cropped-app-logo-32x32.png middle east war – Artifex.News https://artifex.news 32 32 U.S.-Iran war: Tehran threatens to hit Gulf states if Trump launches new strikes https://artifex.news/article71312656-ece/ Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:17:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71312656-ece/ Read More “U.S.-Iran war: Tehran threatens to hit Gulf states if Trump launches new strikes” »

]]>

Iran has warned Gulf states that any new U.S. attack on its territory would trigger ‌retaliation against critical energy infrastructure across the region, according to five sources, as Tehran seeks to raise the cost ​of military action by threatening Washington’s closest regional allies. The warning was delivered through a flurry of high-level diplomatic contacts after ⁠U.S. President Donald Trump threatened on July 28, 2026, to strike Iran’s energy network and infrastructure, the sources said.

Two senior Iranian officials, two Gulf sources and a senior regional diplomat with knowledge of the discussions said Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi spoke with his Saudi, Turkish and Qatari counterparts, as well as Pakistan’s Army chief. ‌All spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

Mr. Araghchi urged Washington’s Gulf allies to use their influence with Mr. Trump to dissuade him from launching renewed strikes, the senior diplomat said, warning that any attack on Iran would ‌prompt retaliation against U.S. assets and energy facilities across the Gulf.

His message was consistent in every conversation, the diplomat said: “We’re ready to ‌retaliate, ⁠but finding a diplomatic solution is the best way to avoid wider escalation and destruction across the region.”

“The Iranian ⁠warning was unequivocal: if America targeted Iran’s infrastructure, they would retaliate by striking Gulf energy facilities and other regional targets,” one Gulf source said. The diplomatic manoeuvering underscores how Iran is attempting to use the threat of wider regional destruction as leverage against further U.S. strikes, putting Gulf states that host U.S. military bases and depend on energy exports in ​a difficult position between Washington and Tehran.

Saudi Crown Prince spoke to Trump

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed ‌bin Salman subsequently spoke with Mr. Trump, urging him to delay military action, return to negotiations, secure a ceasefire and pursue a diplomatic settlement, the senior diplomat and Gulf sources said.

U.S. President Donald Trump poses with Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman during his visit to the White House, Washington in November 2025. File
| Photo Credit:
AP

The warning was intended for every Gulf state, another Gulf source said, but was conveyed primarily through Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Iran has in recent years repaired ties with its Gulf neighbours, including former regional rival Saudi ‌Arabia.

Qatar, Oman and Saudi Arabia have all urged Washington to resume talks with Tehran and avert renewed conflict amid Iranian warnings ​that another round of U.S. strikes could “turn the region into a fireball”, the second Iranian official said. On August 2, Mr. Trump said he agreed to cancel the attack on Iran “subject to being able to rapidly make a ⁠deal”.

Threats of wider regional escalation, says Iranian official

“Saudi Arabia believes further escalation will only bring more destruction,” the first Gulf source said. “That is why it urged Trump to give diplomacy a chance.”

While urging Washington to pursue diplomacy, Riyadh also made clear it would defend itself if threatened. The ‌second Gulf source said Saudi Arabia warned that any attack on its territory would be met with a military response.

Ali Shihabi, a Saudi analyst close to the Royal Court, said the kingdom’s assessment is that further escalation is unlikely to achieve the desired result. “The Kingdom believes a combination of proportionate military responses and sustained pressure on Iran in the Strait of Hormuz offers the strongest path toward a practical diplomatic settlement,” Mr. Shihabi said.

Iran’s clerical leadership has repeatedly demanded the closure of U.S. military bases in the Gulf and called on Gulf Arab states to stop sharing intelligence with Washington, which Tehran believes has been used to facilitate attacks against it.

According to one Iranian official, Tehran’s warning made clear that ‌any new U.S. strike would be met with attacks on energy facilities, refineries, electricity grids, water infrastructure, transport networks and oil fields across the Gulf.

“The enemy continues to ​threaten Iranian infrastructure. If Iran suffers damage, it will inflict far greater damage in return,” the official said. “They still remember Saudi Arabia’s Aramco,” he added, referring to the September 2019 drone and missile attacks on the Abqaiq and Khurais ⁠facilities that temporarily knocked out more than half the kingdom’s crude oil production and exposed the vulnerability of Gulf energy infrastructure.

By threatening infrastructure critical ⁠to Gulf economies, Tehran is seeking to convince both Washington and its Arab partners that another attack on Iran would carry unacceptable economic and strategic consequences, encouraging regional states to press Mr. Trump to avoid renewed military action.

From Tehran’s perspective, Mr. Trump now faces two ‌unpalatable choices, the senior Iranian official said: escalate a conflict that could engulf the Gulf and disrupt global energy supplies, or accept a negotiated outcome that falls short of the decisive victory Washington seeks.

One of the principal obstacles to an agreement, the senior regional diplomat ​said, is Washington’s reluctance to allow Tehran to emerge claiming victory.

“The United States wants something it can present as proof that it won the war,” the diplomat said.

Published – August 06, 2026 03:46 pm IST



Source link

]]>
U.S. launches more strikes on Iran as standoff over Strait of Hormuz escalates https://artifex.news/article71215678-ece/ Sun, 12 Jul 2026 23:51:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71215678-ece/ Read More “U.S. launches more strikes on Iran as standoff over Strait of Hormuz escalates” »

]]>

A man walks next to a symbolic mockup of an Iranian missile and an Iranian flag at Imam Hussein Square in Tehran, Iran, on July 12, 2026
| Photo Credit: via Reuters

The U.S. military said it has launched another round of strikes against Iran “to degrade their ability to attack commercial ships freely transiting the Strait of Hormuz.” The strikes, which took place overnight and into early Monday (July 13, 2026) in Iran, came after attacks by the military on Sunday morning in response to an Iranian strike on a container ship in the critical waterway the day before.

Iran responded to those strikes by attacking Gulf Arab states in an escalating cycle of violence that left the negotiations between Tehran and Washington to end the war at the edge of collapse.

The governor of Qeshm Island near the strait told Iran’s state-run IRNA news agency that projectiles were fired at military targets, with no casualties. Explosions were also heard in the coastal city of Bandar Abbas and Hajiabad city to the north.

A U.S. official said a few strikes were conducted on missile and air defence systems and paramilitary Revolutionary Guard boats at a couple of locations to further degrade Iran’s ability to attack commercial shipping. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to publicly discuss military operations.

Iran and the U.S. are nearly at the midway point of the 60 days of their interim deal aimed at reaching a permanent end to the war. The Strait, a key route for the global supply of oil and natural gas and long considered an international waterway, has become a sticking point in negotiations that seem in danger of collapse.

“A return to full-scale hostilities would have catastrophic consequences,” United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said, according to a statement.

Heavier attacks

The attacks by the U.S. were heavier than in recent days. The U.S. has launched three rounds of airstrikes targeting Iran in the past week over attacks on ships heading through the strait using a route off Oman, seeking to avoid the Islamic Republic’s territorial waters.

“We bombed the hell out of them last night,” President Donald Trump told NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’.

Semi-official Iranian news agencies reported that a navy officer was killed. Iran retaliated by attacking nations in the region hosting US military forces, while insisting it alone must control the strait and potentially charge vessels for travelling through it.

Oman summons Iranian envoy to protest attack

Missile alerts sounded across several Gulf Arab countries. Qatar’s military said it intercepted incoming Iranian fire, with explosions heard in the neighbouring United Arab Emirates. Three people, including a child, were wounded by shrapnel from the interception of attacks, Qatar’s Interior Ministry said.

Missile alerts sounded in Bahrain, home to the US Navy’s 5th Fleet.

Kuwait’s Defence Ministry said three “land border posts” in the north and an offshore drilling platform of the Kuwait Oil Company were damaged, with one worker wounded.

Three Iranian missiles struck areas across Jordan, causing minor damage but no injuries, Jordan’s state news agency reported.

And the Omani state news agency said drones struck sites in an area on the waterway, a day after Oman and Iran held talks on the strait and agreed to continue discussions. The strait sits in Iran and Oman’s territorial waters.

Oman summoned the Iranian ambassador to protest the strikes, the first such move since the war began, calling Iran’s acts “irresponsible.”



Source link

]]>
Trump threatens ‘dropping bombs’ if Iran doesn’t ‘behave’ https://artifex.news/article71114967-ece/ Wed, 17 Jun 2026 16:59:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71114967-ece/ Read More “Trump threatens ‘dropping bombs’ if Iran doesn’t ‘behave’” »

]]>

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference at the G7 summit in Evian-les-Bains, France, June 17, 2026.
| Photo Credit: AP

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday (June 17, 2026) that an interim accord with Iran was not final and that he could resume a bombing campaign if he did not like it or if Tehran did not “behave”.

Also read: West Asia war updates on June 17, 2026

“It’s a memorandum of understanding. And if I don’t like it, we’ll go back to shooting at them, dropping bombs on their heads. If I don’t like it, if they don’t behave, we’ll go right back to dropping bombs right smack in the middle of their head, OK?” Mr. Trump said on the sidelines of a G7 summit in France.

Mr. Trump said the Iran memorandum of understanding did not include immediate sanctions relief for Iran.

Mr. Trump heaped praise on the framework agreement that his administration had negotiated, saying, “That’s a very strong deal. Nobody knows what it is, but it’s very strong, and most people seem to be very happy.”

He said the agreement would be a boon for markets.

“There’s nothing so smart as the market, and the market loves it beyond anything that I’ve actually seen,” he said, adding: “The alternative would be a worldwide depression.”

Oil prices were near a three-month low on Wednesday, with Mr. Trump predicting further decreases: “I think oil prices might get lower than where they were before the war.”

‘Minor war’

Mr. Trump also said that he had spoken to Syria’s leader about combatting Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon, a day after criticising Israel for killing too many civilians and not getting the job done.

“I consider that (Lebanon) the minor war; Iran’s a big one, but we have that little pinprick out there that constantly rears its head, and that’s Hezbollah,” Mr. Trump told presspersons on Tuesday.

Mr. Trump has strongly backed Mr. Sharaa, a former al-Qaeda commander who toppled long-ruling autocrat Bashar al-Assad and has sought to portray himself as a moderate leader trying to unify his war-ravaged nation and end its isolation.



Source link

]]>
Iran blames U.S. for latest exchanges of fire with Israel https://artifex.news/article71076010-ece/ Mon, 08 Jun 2026 10:57:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71076010-ece/ Read More “Iran blames U.S. for latest exchanges of fire with Israel” »

]]>

A woman stands among the rubble of her house, which was damaged in a U.S. and Israeli strike in March, in Tehran, Iran June 7, 2026.
| Photo Credit: WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters

Overnight exchanges of fire between Iran and ​Israel will only worsen an already “chaotic diplomatic ‌process” with the United States, ​Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson ⁠Esmaeil Baghaei said on Monday (June 8, 2026), adding that Tehran was exchanging messages with Washington ‌in an atmosphere of “extreme suspicion”.

Mr. Baghaei said Israel’s actions in Lebanon, ‌whether carried out with U.S. knowledge ‌and ⁠consent or not, were ⁠aimed at sabotaging diplomacy. He said Washington, as a party to the April 8 ceasefire, ​bore direct ‌responsibility for any violations, including attacks attributed to Israel, and he added that the world should be concerned ‌about a broader regional conflict.

“The ​United States bears direct responsibility for any action the Zionist ⁠regime (Israel) takes in relation to violating regional peace and security against Iran,” ‌Mr. Baghaei said.

He said the visit of Pakistan’s Interior Minister to Tehran on Sunday (June 7, 2026) was part of efforts to continue indirect exchanges with Washington. Separately, Baghaei said Iran would ‌respond to any resolution against it at ​this week’s meeting of the U.N. nuclear watchdog’s Board of ⁠Governors.

He accused International Atomic Energy Agency ⁠chief Rafael Grossi of disregarding the realities of the conflict ‌and holding biased political views that harmed the agency’s legitimacy. 



Source link

]]>
Pakistan Army chief Munir concludes three-day Iran visit https://artifex.news/article70876894-ece/ Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:09:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70876894-ece/ Read More “Pakistan Army chief Munir concludes three-day Iran visit” »

]]>

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian meets with Pakistan army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir, in Tehran, Iran, on April 16, 2026. ISPR via Reuters

Pakistan’s Chief of Defence Forces Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir has concluded his three-day visit to Iran as part of Islamabad’s efforts to resolve the conflict between the U.S. and Iran.

Mr. Munir, who was heading a high-level delegation to Iran, landed in Tehran on Wednesday (April 15, 2026), becoming the first foreign military leader to visit the country since a two-week ceasefire was agreed between Iran and the U.S. on April 8.



Source link

]]>
Trump says he has ‘good news’ on Iran, offers no clarity on peace deal https://artifex.news/article70876600-ece/ Sat, 18 Apr 2026 06:20:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70876600-ece/ Read More “Trump says he has ‘good news’ on Iran, offers no clarity on peace deal” »

]]>

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to members of the press aboard Air Force One on April 17, 2026. Photo: Getty Images via AFP

U.S. President Donald Trump ​said there had been “some pretty good news” about Iran, suggesting optimism about peace talks to end the war in West Asia, but he said a ceasefire in the conflict may not ‌be extended without a deal by Wednesday (April 22, 2026).

Iran, hours earlier, had temporarily reopened the Strait of Hormuz following a separate U.S.-brokered ceasefire agreement ​by Israel and Lebanon. But subsequent statements from both sides left uncertainty over how quickly shipping might return to normal through the global oil ⁠choke point.



Source link

]]>
Indonesia lays to rest peacekeepers who were killed in Lebanon https://artifex.news/article70825940-ece/ Sun, 05 Apr 2026 05:42:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70825940-ece/ Read More “Indonesia lays to rest peacekeepers who were killed in Lebanon” »

]]>

Indonesian military personnel carry the coffin of a United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) peacekeeper killed in Lebanon, during a military honour ceremony at Soekarno-Hatta International Airport, in Tangerang, on the outskirts of Jakarta, Indonesia, on April 4, 2026.
| Photo Credit: Reuters

Three Indonesian peacekeepers killed in two separate explosions in southern Lebanon last week were laid to rest in their hometowns on Sunday (April 5, 2026).

Iran-Israel war LIVE on April 5, 2026

Peacekeeper Farizal Rhomadhon, 28, died when a projectile exploded on March 29 in southern Lebanon, where Israel and Hezbollah have been fighting since Lebanon was drawn into the Middle East war.

Two other blue helmets, Zulmi Aditya Iskandar, 33, and Muhammad Nur Ichwan, 26, died a day later when an explosion struck a logistics convoy of the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), also in southern Lebanon.

The deadly incidents sparked calls from Indonesian authorities for an investigation and security guarantees for peacekeeping forces.

The soldiers were buried on Sunday (April 5, 2026) in coffins draped in the Indonesian flag during military funerals with gun salutes.

Weeping family members scattered flower petals on their graves.

Zulmi was buried in a military cemetery in his hometown in Bandung, West Java, while Ichwan and Farizal were laid to rest in their respective hometowns in Central Java and Yogyakarta.

“I’m letting him go proudly. I accept it sincerely, even though it is not what I had hoped as a parent,” Zulmi’s father Iskandarudin told reporters after the funeral.

“I am certain that he’s waiting for me in heaven.”

Agus Subiyanto, the commander of the Indonesian National Armed Forces, told reporters that every fallen soldier will receive compensation in recognition of their service.

“We have prepared all the rights and entitlements that must be given to the fallen soldiers. Among these is compensation from the United Nations,” Mr. Agus said after attending Zulmi’s funeral.

The bodies of the three peacekeepers arrived in Jakarta on Saturday (April 4, 2026), received with honours in a ceremony attended by President Prabowo Subianto.

Mr. Prabowo said on Instagram that Indonesians “strongly condemn every heinous act that undermines peace and causes the deaths of our nation’s soldiers”.

Less than a week after the explosions that killed the three peacekeepers, another blast took place at a UN facility near El Adeisse on Friday (April 3, 2026), injuring three more Indonesian blue helmets.

Indonesia’s Foreign Ministry called the attacks “unacceptable” and urged the UN Security Council “to immediately convene a meeting of troop-contributing countries to UNIFIL to conduct a review and take measures to enhance the protection of personnel serving with UNIFIL”.

Foreign Minister Sugiono, who like many Indonesians only has one name, told reporters on Saturday (April 4, 2026) that Indonesia wanted a thorough UN investigation, and demanded better security guarantees for peacekeeping soldiers.



Source link

]]>
U.S. weighs sending up to 10,000 troops to West Asia: reports https://artifex.news/article70793780-ece/ Fri, 27 Mar 2026 16:14:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70793780-ece/ Read More “U.S. weighs sending up to 10,000 troops to West Asia: reports” »

]]>

Image used for representational purposes. File
| Photo Credit: AP

The United States is weighing sending up to 10,000 extra troops to West Asia, U.S. media reported on Friday (March 27, 2026), as speculation grows that Washington may be preparing a ground operation in Iran.

The deployment would mark a significant boost to Washington’s military presence in the region, despite U.S. President Donald Trump insisting that Tehran was taking part in peace talks with Washington to end the war.

The Wall Street Journal reported that the move would aim to provide Mr. Trump with “more military options” in West Asia, engulfed by war since U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28.

The troops would join thousands of paratroopers and Marines who have already been ordered to the region.

An Iranian official said on Wednesday (March 26, 2026) that Tehran would retaliate to a ground invasion of its territory by Washington by activating its Houthi rebels in Yemen to attack shipping in the Red Sea.

That would open up a new front in a war of spiralling economic, political and military repercussions.

Mr. Trump has repeatedly said he does not plan to send ground troops into combat with Iran.

“It is unclear where precisely forces will go in the Middle East, but they will likely be within striking distance of Iran and Kharg Island, a crucial oil export hub off Iran’s coast,” the Journal said.

The Pentagon did not immediately respond to AFP‘s request for comment.

Mr. Trump has pushed back his deadline for strikes on Iran’s energy assets, assuring that talks on ending the war were “going very well.”

Israel’s military, meanwhile, said early Friday (March 27, 2026) that it carried out “a wide-scale wave of strikes targeting infrastructure of the Iranian terror regime in the heart of Tehran”.



Source link

]]>
Spanish PM says West Asia war ‘far worse’ than Iraq in 2003 https://artifex.news/article70785376-ece/ Wed, 25 Mar 2026 17:31:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70785376-ece/ Read More “Spanish PM says West Asia war ‘far worse’ than Iraq in 2003” »

]]>

“This time, it’s an absurd and illegal war,” Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said. File
| Photo Credit: Reuters

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez warned on Wednesday (March 25, 2026) that the Middle East war presented a “far worse” scenario than the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

“This is not the same scenario as the illegal war in Iraq. We are facing something far worse. Much worse. With a potential impact that is far broader and far deeper,” he told parliament.

Also Read: Israel-Iran war LIVE

“This time, it’s an absurd and illegal war. A cruel one that sets us back from achieving our economic, social, and environmental goals,” he said.

The Socialist premier has refused Washington’s requests to use Madrid’s military bases against Iran, despite U.S. President Donald Trump’s threat to sever trade with Spain as a result.

Mr. Sanchez said the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 had failed to achieve its goals and instead made life worse for ordinary people, saying it led to a sharp increase in fuel and grocery prices, a migration crisis and jihadist attacks in Europe.

He warned that the attacks on Iran could have a similar economic impact for millions.

“Every bomb that falls in the Middle East eventually hits — as we are already seeing — the wallets of our families,” Mr. Sanchez said.

His government approved last week a sweeping package worth five billion euros ($5.8 billion) aimed at cushioning the economic impact of the Middle East war, which included reductions on taxes on fuel.

“It is not fair that some set the world on fire while others bear the ashes. It is not right that Spaniards and other Europeans should pay out of their own pockets for this illegal war,” Mr. Sanchez said.

His Iraq reference may strike a chord with Spanish voters.

Support for that war by the conservative Popular Party (PP) in power at the time which sent troops to Iraq was widely unpopular and sparked mass protests.

Some analysts say it paved the way for the Socialist Party’s surprise win in March 2004, days after deadly jihadist bombings hit Madrid.

A branch of Al-Qaeda claimed responsibility for the attacks and called for the withdrawal of Spanish forces from Iraq.

A majority of Spaniards, 53.2%, back Mr. Sanchez’s decision not to let the United States use the Rota naval base and Moron airbase in strikes against Iran, a poll published earlier this month in daily newspaper El Pais showed.



Source link

]]>
Israel is an apartheid state; peace in West Asia is far off: Gideon Levy https://artifex.news/article70757915-ece/ Wed, 18 Mar 2026 13:45:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70757915-ece/ Read More “Israel is an apartheid state; peace in West Asia is far off: Gideon Levy” »

]]>

Israel is waging a war against Iran and has launched a ground offensive against Hezbollah in Lebanon. Gaza, despite a ceasefire, continues to witness Israeli assaults, while settler violence goes on in the occupied West Bank. “For Israel, the military option is not the last option, but the first option,” says Gideon Levy, Israeli journalist and author. In a freewheeling conversation with The Hindu, Mr. Levy said Israel’s militarism “is very destructive, and it also shapes the mindset of people in this country.” He also spoke about Israel’s decapitation strategy, the status of the Palestine question and the scope for peace with Iran. Edited excerpts.

Iran-Israel war LIVE updates


Let’s start with the ongoing war on Iran. Do you think Israel and the U.S. are winning the war or they entirely miscalculated the Iranian response?


As it seems now, there will be no clear victory in this war. There will be a heavy price which is being paid already now. Both parties, the United States and Israel, launched this war without having any idea. The cause of changing regime in Iran might be a legitimate cause and the needed one for the security and the freedom of the region, but I’m not sure it can be achieved all by force. And even if, let’s say, a miracle happens and the regime in Iran falls; and then what? Does anyone have any clue who will replace this regime in Iran? We are facing the same problem with Hamas in Gaza. Israel does not want Hamas. Hamas is really a bad organisation, but nobody has a clue who can replace Hamas. So if you don’t have an endgame, a clear endgame, don’t start wars.

And we are now in the stage in which it gets more and more complicated, more and more bloodshed, more and more destruction, more and more countries joining. I mean, there are already almost half of the region is in war. Who will benefit out of it except of the arm dealers and arm industry?


Israel has always used decapitation as a strategy to achieve its objectives. Iran’s Supreme Leader was killed on February 28. Just now, Ali Larijani was killed. Do you think such killings have helped Israel become a safer country?


Not at all, with a capital letter. First of all, I have my doubts about the legitimacy of such actions. You don’t kill heads of states, I mean, unless you are facing a Hitler, which is not the case [here]. But let’s put aside the moral and the legal question. What did Israel achieve out of all the assassinations throughout the years? The replacement is almost always more radical than the predecessor. What do you think that the son of Khamenei will be more moderate than the father, or the contrary? So I don’t think it’s legitimate. I don’t think it’s legal, but above all, it doesn’t serve any purpose because finally you have to think who is going to replace all those leaders.


How do you look at this war from Israel? Iranian missiles are still hitting Israel. Is it as bad as it is projected on social media?


It always looks worse from the outside. I know it from conflicts that I used to cover elsewhere. I was always more scared before I went to the place rather than after I got there, because people, human beings, always create themselves a new routine. We have a very, very good protection system, alert system; we get an alert the moment the missile is launched far away in Iran, thousands of kilometres away. We are already going to the shelters if there are shelters. But it’s not normal life. I just came out of the shelter. You are going a few times a day, day and night. The economy is paralysed, no education system, and very few flights abroad. I mean, this cannot be a routine for long. So people absorb it. I must tell you that the figures are astonishing— 93-94% Jewish Israelis support this war, which is almost a North Korean figure. I think they’ll have their second thoughts when it gets more and more complicated. Iran was portrayed in Israeli media for years as the great demon. So people support any fight against the great demon, but things might change.


What is your take about Iran?


There is this rhetoric. Calling for death to Israel and death to the United States is ugly, but that’s not an existential threat. What was really disturbing was the creation of all kinds of proxies of Iran surrounding Israel. In the north, Hezbollah; in the south, Hamas; the Houthis in Yemen — it’s a whole ring of fire. So I don’t say that Iran is something that Israel could ignore, but I’m not sure that military power is the answer or the solution. I still believe that by diplomacy, we could have reached much more, mainly on the nuclear capabilities. I’m not sure we gave enough chance for diplomacy. I must remind you that the Americans cancelled the [2015] agreement, not the Iranians.


Israel has been at non-stop wars for the last 30 months—in Gaza, now in Iran, in Lebanon, etc. How is this perpetual conflict shaping the Israeli society?


First of all, we cannot ignore the price of the other side, which is 100 times heavier. By the time we are talking now, there are around 6 to 7 million people around the Middle East [West Asia], who were uprooted from their homes, part of them forever. In Gaza, 2 million, in Iran, over 3 million, in Lebanon, almost a million. This is unacceptable. So let’s not forget the price of the other side, and all by Israel, all those people lost their lives. So this is, by itself, very disturbing. Now, for Israel, the military option is not the last option, but the first option. This is very destructive, and it also shapes the mindset of people in this country. And the mindset of Israel and the people of Israel is very aggressive, very militaristic. This doesn’t promise a lot in terms of any society.

When you launch a war, you only think, will I win? Do I have enough troops, enough technology, enough weapons? Think also about the social price, the economic price, the mental price, the educational price, the moral price, and all this is not being taken into account.


How do you look at the future of the Palestinian question? You had mentioned yourself that for peace and stability in the region, you need to find a solution to the Palestinian question.


So, unfortunately, the Palestinians are always the ones who pay the biggest price. And they are totally off the table now, and the solution for their problem, which is now 100 years old, is getting further and further away. And except for condemnation and declarations [from the world], they get nothing. And they achieve nothing. They didn’t achieve anything in the last decade. Nothing except for bloodshed, terrible killings, genocide and transfer. We are speaking all about Gaza. I travel at least once a week to the West Bank. What people are going through there, that’s not life. They live in cages now. They cannot leave their villages in many cases, pogroms on a daily basis.

The solution for the Palestinian problem for the Palestinian people is farther now than ever. The two-state solution, in my view, lost its chance. It’s a train that left the station with 7,00,000 Jewish settlers. Nobody is going to evacuate the West Bank. Israel never had the intention to do so. And I’m afraid that they will end like the American natives. There is also the danger that Israel will use the wars to transfer at least part of them [Palestinians]. The plans are still there, both for Gaza and the West Bank. I don’t think Israel gave it up. It’s now not possible, but it might come back. And each war like this makes their position worse and worse, even though there will never be stability and peace in the Middle East [West Asia] without a solution to their problem. Never.

This will continue to bleed, a people without citizenship, maybe the only people in the world without citizenship, a people without any rights, this will continue to bleed. And as long as this bleeds, nothing will be solved.

Watch Gideon Levy talk about two-state solution


So how long Israel can continue this in your view? On the one side, this unchecked militarism in the region and inside, the systemic segregation against the Palestinians?


Israel has been continuing like this for a long time. The question is not how long Israel can continue with it. The question is, what kind of Israel will we become? Israel is also changing throughout those conflicts, and for the bad, not for the good. It’s not the Israel we knew 10 and 20 years ago, and it will get more and more violent, more and more nationalistic, more and more racist, and more and more militaristic. We see it happening by the time we are talking now. And the question is also, for how long will the world let it go on like this?

The world, which knew so very well how to handle the first apartheid state, namely South Africa, is totally passive about the second apartheid state, and part of it continues to hug Israel.


So you’re saying Israel is an apartheid state?


How else can you describe it when there are two peoples, one people with all the rights and the other people has no rights whatsoever? How else can you define it? I don’t know any other definition.


Right now, Israel is carrying out massive attacks in Lebanon as well. What does Israel want to achieve in Lebanon? Can they militarily solve the Hezbollah problem?


We tried it already twice or thrice – we had a buffer zone, we conquered half of Lebanon, and it didn’t lead to anything. Israel didn’t become a more secure place. Now there is a big opportunity because we are facing a government, for the first time in history, a government in Lebanon, which seems to be ready, really, to open a new page with Israel, and to make anything possible to disarm Hezbollah. But we don’t give them a chance. By destroying Lebanon, we will not achieve anything. We tried it. We destroyed Lebanon, we conquered Lebanon, and Hezbollah is today not less strong than 10 years ago, five years ago, maybe even politically stronger.


Why there is so much resistance to diplomacy in Israel?


First of all, first of all, it’s always easier for the ruling classes or for the government to go for military adventures. Because it has more glory, and it unites the people around you. And it is, you know, nationalistic and militaristic. And when the atmosphere is so nationalistic and militaristic, like in Israel, there’s no room for diplomacy. So any politician who goes now for diplomacy will commit political suicide, and they know it. So it’s a vicious circle. The politicians are creating this atmosphere, this mindset. And then they cannot change it. It would be very hard to take us back to the 1990s when Israel really was ready for trying diplomacy.


Let me take you back to Iran. What do you think the endgame is? Will there be peace or prolonged conflict?


So first of all, as I said before, because there is no intention even to touch the Palestinian problem, peace and stability will not prevail in the coming future. Because of this, you really need to concentrate. First of all, this is the source for everything. I don’t say that Iran is attacking Israel because of the Palestinian question. No, but the Palestinian question gives Iran a justification to attack Israel. And the same for Hezbollah and the same for Hamas.

Right now, we can only look for some kind of stability, namely, to end, first of all, the war with Iran through an agreement between the United States and Iran. I still believe it is possible. I don’t see an alternative. Because Iran is quite strong. They can absorb, and they proved it in history with the war against Iraq. And Israel cannot take it for years. No way. So I hope there will be some kind of agreement. I think Donald Trump already realises what a fiasco he created here, and he will try to minimise the damage now. And minimising this damage now is to get down from the high tree that he climbed on and to try to get to a new agreement.

Once Donald Trump gets out of Iran, Israel cannot continue in Iran by itself. No way. In Lebanon, yes, not in Iran. So at least we’ll neutralise this war with Iran, and we’ll get some kind of stability again. But again, it will be only for a few years and then we are back in the same place.

Published – March 18, 2026 06:28 pm IST



Source link

]]>