kerala agriculture – Artifex.News https://artifex.news Stay Connected. Stay Informed. Tue, 20 Oct 2026 18:43:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3 https://artifex.news/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cropped-cropped-app-logo-32x32.png kerala agriculture – Artifex.News https://artifex.news 32 32 On paddy field conservation in Keralam https://artifex.news/article71605301-ecerand29/ Tue, 20 Oct 2026 18:43:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71605301-ecerand29/ Read More “On paddy field conservation in Keralam” »

]]>

‘The structural and procedural modifications to KCPWA demonstrate how even a strong conservation law can be diluted.’ File
| Photo Credit: K.K. Mustafah

A conservation law meant to protect Keralam’s paddy fields is gradually becoming an instrument facilitating its decline. The State had 8.82 lakh hectares (ha) of paddy fields during 1974-75, which reduced to 1.76 lakh ha in 2024-25, a drop of 80%, owing to crop shifts, housing and commercial growth, developmental needs, and a speculative land market. Despite the enactment of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act (KCPWA) in 2008, the decline continues.

Also read | An Act at a crossroads 

Rather than ineffective enforcement, what is unfolding is an implausible dilution of conservation logic through ongoing bureaucratic redesign, effected by multiple circulars and orders. The shift is astounding, as the State rightfully recognised the ecological value of paddy fields within KCPWA.

A case of legal dilution

The structural and procedural modifications to KCPWA demonstrate how even a strong conservation law can be diluted. The Kerala Finance (No.2) Act, 2015, amended the KCPWA by adding Section 3A, which regularised unauthorised paddy field conversions prior to 2008 upon the payment of a nominal fee. This contravened the Local Self-Government Department (LSGD) circulars of 2008 and 2011, which set 1998 as the cut-off year for implementing the conservation norms, thereby legitimising the reclamations between 1998 and 2008. In 2016, a State notification removed Section 3A without reference to the regularisation cases during the amendment period.

Also read | Kerala Revised Budget: Land Reforms 2.0 proposal opens up new political battle lines

Although the KCPWA mandates the development of a verifiable databank of paddy fields, the process remains incomplete. Consequently, no reliable data source exists to verify the land status in many districts. This blatant administrative failure has become a legal loophole, as the KCPWA (Amendment) 2018 and successive revenue circulars are facilitating the conversion of a larger extent of unnotified land (paddy fields in revenue records but not included in the databank) for residential, commercial, or other purposes.

Building permits on unnotified lands are facilitated by expanding eligibility criteria and expediting category change applications. In 2017, the LSGD withdrew its 2008 and 2011 circulars, which declared 1998 as the cut-off year for regularisation, and its 2012 and 2013 circulars, which restricted land transactions after obtaining housing permits. Despite a High Court order in 2015 for strict legal compliance in building permit issuance, from 2016 onwards, multiple LSGD and revenue circulars facilitated the rapid disposal of applications, with little emphasis on water conservation mandates.

The Comptroller and Auditor General of India’s revenue sector report of 2016 identified the non-detection of illegal paddy field conversions, the non-reporting of unauthorised reclamations, legal non-compliance, and non-reinstatement of illegally converted land as major lapses. The scrutiny turns challenging as the State is fast-tracking conversion applications by deploying additional officials and infrastructure and processing land parcels in clusters.

Until 2002, the Department of Agriculture, with direct agro-ecological stakes in wetland conservation, largely monitored non-agricultural land use. Post-KCPWA, the Department of Revenue became the primary monitoring authority. The Department’s dual role as both a conservation regulator and a revenue generator from regularisation confers immense power over land-use decision-making. Until 2024, the Department earned up to ₹1,606 crore through paddy field regularisation. A strict enforcement of the conservation law remains constrained since the regulator earns consistent revenue from paddy field conversion, causing a structural dilemma.

Over the years, bureaucratic enforcement appears to be facilitating regularisation of paddy fields — recategorisation to non-wetland status, dilution of water-conservation mandates, and widening of conversion eligibility — with limited conservation focus. Neglecting paddy fields as a socio-ecological system that regulates local biodiversity, the hydrological cycle, and microclimate constitutes a grave failure, amid rising food insecurity and floods.

Given that the KCPWA is a progressive statute, political and administrative goodwill is needed to achieve its conservation goals. Completion of a verifiable wetland-paddy databank, strict monitoring, and ecologically informed conversion penalties are a few of the immediate steps that can be taken.

Chitra K. P. is Assistant Professor, Department of Social Work, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur. Preetha K.V. is Assistant Professor, PG Department of Social Entrepreneurship, Madras School of Social Work, Chennai



Source link

]]>
Why many Kerala farmers are ditching cash crops like rubber for rambutan and other exotic fruits https://artifex.news/article65918178-ece/ Thu, 22 Sep 2022 13:07:17 +0000 https://artifex.news/article65918178-ece/ Read More “Why many Kerala farmers are ditching cash crops like rubber for rambutan and other exotic fruits” »

]]>

Probing through the thick, green leaves of a 15-foot-tall tree, 63-year-old Safiya Sulaiman plucked a reddish orb with a prickly rind. As she cut around its equator, what popped out was a snow-white segment that is highly coveted for its sweetness.

“This fruit is making quite a splash,” she said, savouring the succulence that has assimilated itself lately into the eating habits of Keralites; the rambutan.

For this woman farmer from Erumely, a village on the eastern high-ranges of Kottayam, every harvest season in her farm is a vindication of a decision to ‘grow out of ordinary’. It was exactly a decade ago that Sulaiman, her late husband, had decided to get rid of the overhang of natural rubber on their one-acre farm.

Also read: Setting a model in exotic fruits cultivation

Third year of planting

“Rubber was no longer an attractive crop and we were looking for something that could be a mix of novelty and business. We decided on rambutan, which replaced the rubber trees in the entire property,” she said. There was scepticism initially. The concerns gave way to awe as the trees started bearing fruits within the third year of planting itself. The fruits in her farm have gone all the way to Europe. Currently, they fetch her ₹3 lakh a year.

Ms. Sulaiman, according to officials with the Agriculture department, belongs to a growing list of farmers carefully nurturing an array of exotic fruits in the tropical hills of Kerala. “Such fruits are turning up at farms across the mid-lands and the foothills,” said Geetha Varghese, Principal Agriculture Officer, Kottayam.

People willing to pay

The switch to these fruits helps farmers ignore the fluctuations of natural rubber, because their crops are worth much more. People are not hesitant to pay a premium for such fruits.

As per State Horticulture Mission figures, the area under commercial cultivation of exotic fruits remained only a fraction of the 3.10 lakh hectares of land under fruit cultivation. The area under cultivation of exotic fruits stood at just 994 hectares in 2021.

2.5 lakh mangosteen saplings

However, stakeholder agencies, argue that these figures represent only a part of the story as a majority of such plants are making their way to homesteads instead of commercial farms. To back the point, they point to the sales figure registered by Home Grown Biotech, one of the largest plant production nurseries in south India, which has sold around 2.5 lakh mangosteen saplings in the last one year alone.

Jose Jacob, managing director of the nursery, too attested to a rapid expansion of exotic fruits across Kerala. This growth, according to him, is primarily driven by the quest for better returns in view of the fluctuating fortunes of natural rubber. “The fine sugar-acid balance of Kerala’s tropical soil makes it one of the best places to grow exotic fruits. The presence of four distinct seasons across the State too keeps its fruit basket full for nine months a year,” he said.

A view of the rambutan fruits in a farm in Kerala.
| Photo Credit:
SPECIAL ARRANGEMENT

Besides mangosteen and rambutan, among the exotic fruits agro-climatically suited for farming in Kerala are durian, passion fruit, dragon fruit, litchi and avocado. Moving up the value chain, fruit farming on such a large scale throws open the prospects of food processing units, in addition to the scope for exports.

Also read: Dragon fruit is making its way to terraces and home gardens in Kerala

Export-oriented units

But to achieve this, the government needs to step in and ensure integration of the supply and export chains. “Instead of the individual arrangements based on each season’s supply, there should be government-facilitated export-oriented units. In the long run, it will help arrest the falling revenue from plantation sector and generate more employment among rural youth,” said Mr. Jacob.

Realising that the era of rubber opulence is well past its prime, the community of planters has now called for relaxation of the rules governing Kerala’s plantation sector, which accounts for one-fifth of the total cultivable land in the State. Attempts have been launched to convince the State government on the need to bring a semblance of logic in certain critical provisions of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and Kerala Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1969.

Also read: Fortunes are stretching a bit too thin for rubber

Crops in demand

“The plantations are bleeding but the question of diversification is even more complex, given the rigid rules that have limited the cultivation in plantations to the approved cash crops such as rubber, tea, coffee, cardamom and cocoa. This has retarded the growth of Kerala’s plantation sector,’’ noted V.C. Sebastian, National Secretary General, the Indian Farmer’s Movement (INFAM).

In his opinion, the traditional classification of plantation, limiting them to a few crops, no longer holds relevance in the face of agriculture rationalisation. “Blending crops, tourism and even livestock, a practice loosely called agro-forestry, could boost revenue from the same piece of land,” he added.

Diversification of plantations to include fruit farming, among other things, may not a silver bullet to address vagaries of climate change, market, or the biodiversity crisis. But the growers remain hopeful in its ability to command a significant premium and turn around their fortunes.

Also read: Abiu, achachiru, gac: These exotic fruits are now at home in India



Source link

]]>