Jayalalithaa – Artifex.News https://artifex.news Stay Connected. Stay Informed. Fri, 12 Jun 2026 01:15:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2 https://artifex.news/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cropped-cropped-app-logo-32x32.png Jayalalithaa – Artifex.News https://artifex.news 32 32 ED files protest petition against DVAC’s attempt to close ₹27.90 crore bribery case against former Minister Vaithilingam https://artifex.news/article71090724-ecerand29/ Fri, 12 Jun 2026 01:15:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71090724-ecerand29/ Read More “ED files protest petition against DVAC’s attempt to close ₹27.90 crore bribery case against former Minister Vaithilingam” »

]]>

Former Minister R. Vaithilingam.
| Photo Credit: R.M. Rajarathinam

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) has filed a protest petition before the Principal Sessions Court in Chennai objecting to a move by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti Corruption (DVAC) to close a ₹27.90 crore bribery case against former AIADMK former Minister R. Vaithilingam who had resigned his MLA post in January 2026 before joining the DMK.

The protest petition, filed throug ED Special Public Prosecutor N. Ramesh, stated that the DVAC had registered a First Information Report (FIR) against Mr. Vaithilingam on September 19, 2024 for an alleged offence committed by him during his tenure as Minister for Housing and Urban Development in former Chief Minister Jayalalithaa’s Cabinet between 2011 and 2016.

According to the FIR, Mr. Vaithilingam, in his capacity as ex-officio chairman of Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, had received a bribe of ₹27.90 crore from Shriram Properties and Infrastructure Private Limited (subsequently renamed as Gateway Office Parks Private Limited) for granting planning permission to construct 1,453 additional buildings on 57.94 acres of land at GST Road in Perungaluthur, Chennai.

Since the FIR had been booked under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) of 1988, the ED too registered a Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) on October 1, 2024 and initiated investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The central agency completed its probe and filed a prosecution complaint (similar to a charge sheet) before the Sessions Court, which was also the special court for PMLA cases, on July 14, 2025.

The PMLA investigation revealed that Bharath Coal Chemicals Limited (a group company of Shriram Properties) had paid ₹27.90 crore to Muthammal Estates Private Limited, a company beneficially owned and controlled by Mr. Vaithilingam and his family members, in multiple tranches between January 28, 2016 and February 4, 2016 being the bribe consideration for the planning permission.

As a result of the payment, the planning permission pending since December 2, 2013 was cleared on February 24, 2016, within three weeks of receipt of the bribe thereby conclusively establishing the quid pro quo. Further, the bribe amount was immediately invested in purchase of immovable properties in the names of the family members of the accused and their current market value exceeds ₹100 crore, the ED said.

Stating that it had provisionally attached all those properties pending trial in the PMLA case, the ED said that it had shared the interim findings of its investigaiton with the DVAC on March 10, 2025 and also transmitted the entire copy of the prosecution complaint on May 19, 2026 with a specific request to the State agency to utilise those materials before filing the final report in PCA case.

However, in the interregnum, Mr. Vaithilingam quit the AIADMK in January 2026 and joined the DMK which was the then ruling party. Immediately, the DVAC filed a closure report in the PCA case before the Sessions Court in the last week of February 2026 “in suspicious proximity to the expiry of the term of the then State government,” the protest petition filed by ED Assistant Director Gopal Gulabrao Gadge read.

It went on to state: “The filing of a closure report (by the DVAC) in a case involving a complete and documented money trail, just before a change of government and without taking into account the comprehensive evidence furnished by the peittioner department under Section 66(2) of the PMLA raises grave doubts about the bona fides of the investigation.”

Fearing that the PMLA case investigated by the ED would collapse if the accused escapes from the DVAC case, the central agency urged the sessions court to reject the closure report filed by the DVAC and consequently direct the State agency to conduct a further investigation before filing a comprehensive final report/chargesheet in the PCA case too.

The protest petition is expected to be taken up for hearing by the Sessions Court on Friday (June 12, 2026).



Source link

]]>
Golden Sword, Crowns Among J Jayalalithaa’s Seized Assets Given To Tamil Nadu https://artifex.news/disproportionate-assets-case-tamil-nadu-golden-sword-crown-among-j-jayalalithaas-seized-assets-given-to-tamil-nadu-7718404rand29/ Sat, 15 Feb 2025 14:39:42 +0000 https://artifex.news/disproportionate-assets-case-tamil-nadu-golden-sword-crown-among-j-jayalalithaas-seized-assets-given-to-tamil-nadu-7718404rand29/ Read More “Golden Sword, Crowns Among J Jayalalithaa’s Seized Assets Given To Tamil Nadu” »

]]>



Bengaluru:

Nearly 27 kg of gold ornaments, including at least two golden crowns and a gold sword, were some of the items belonging to former chief minister and AIADMK chief J Jayalalithaa that were handed over to Tamil Nadu government by a special court in Karnataka as part of a process that began on Friday. The items were seized in connection with a disproportionate case against the former Tamil Nadu chief minister, who died in 2016, and had been lying in the Karnataka state treasury for nearly 21 years. 

Some of the other articles in the treasure trove are 481 items made of gold – including a golden ornament shaped like what appears to be the former chief minister’s profile – documents of over 1,520 acres of land and some cash. Visuals showed officials carrying out bags, suitcases and trunks full of the items. 

The disproportionate assets case against Jayalalithaa, which lasted about 18 years, was transferred to Bengaluru from Chennai. She and three other accused, including her close associate VK Sasikala and Ms Sasikala’s relatives VN Sudhakaran and J Ilavarasi, were convicted by a special court in Bengaluru in 2014. They were acquitted by the Karnataka High Court in 2015 but the order was overturned by the Supreme Court in 2017.

On January 29, a special CBI court had ordered the transfer of all confiscated assets belonging to Jayalalithaa to the Tamil Nadu government and the Supreme Court, on Friday, dismissed a petition by Jayalilthaa’s niece and nephew, J Deepa and J Deepak, claiming ownership of the items. The Supreme Court said that the abatement of proceedings after Jayalalithaa’s death did not mean she was acquitted of the crime. 

To Be Auctioned?

Kiran S Javali, the public prosecutor in the disproportionate assets case, said, “The trial court had ordered that all the assets of six companies, having an acreage of 1,526.16 acres, to be confiscated to the state of Tamil Nadu. It had also directed that 27 kg of gold ornaments should be confiscated to the state government. The court handed over all these items to the officers of the Home and Vigilance departments of the state of Tamil Nadu.” 

“The government of Tamil Nadu can either send it to the Reserve Bank of India or take steps to auction it to recover the money,” he added. 

An official said a luxury bus, which is parked in Chennai, was also seized as part of the proceedings.




Source link

]]>
Dead Leaders “Rise” In Tamil Nadu, As Deepfake Tools Warp Poll Campaign https://artifex.news/late-jayalalithaa-karunanidhi-campaign-for-polls-amid-deepfake-surge-5365616rand29/ Wed, 03 Apr 2024 08:36:58 +0000 https://artifex.news/late-jayalalithaa-karunanidhi-campaign-for-polls-amid-deepfake-surge-5365616rand29/ Read More “Dead Leaders “Rise” In Tamil Nadu, As Deepfake Tools Warp Poll Campaign” »

]]>

Death has not extinguished the decades-long rivalry between two Indian leaders: both have now seemingly risen from the grave, in digital form, to rally their supporters ahead of national elections.

Political parties are harnessing powerful artificial intelligence tools to make deepfakes, reproducing famous faces and voices in ways that often appear authentic.

Both the government and campaigners have warned that the spread of such tools is a dangerous and growing threat to the integrity of elections in India.

With a marathon six-week general election starting on April 19, so-called “ghost appearances” — the use of dead leaders in videos — have become a popular mode of campaigning in the southern Tamil Nadu state.

Actress turned politician J Jayalalithaa died in 2016, but she has been featured in a voice message deeply critical of the state’s current governing party, once led by arch-rival M Karunanidhi.

“We have a corrupt and useless state government,” her digital avatar says. “Stand by me… we are for the people.”

Karunanidhi died in 2018 but has appeared in AI-generated videos — clad in his trademark black sunglasses — showering praise on his son MK Stalin, the state’s current chief minister.

Recycling “very charismatic” speakers offered a novel way to grab attention, said Senthil Nayagam, founder of Chennai-based firm Muonium, which made the AI video purporting to be Karunanidhi.

Resurrecting dead leaders is also a cost-effective way of campaigning compared to traditional rallies, which are time-consuming to organise and expensive to stage for voters accustomed to a grand spectacle.

“Bringing crowds is a difficult thing,” Nayagam told AFP. “And how many times can you do a laser or drone show?”

‘Very thin line’

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has been an eager early adopter of technology in election campaigning.

In 2014, the year he swept to power, the party expanded Modi’s campaign reach by using 3D projections of the leader to make him appear virtually at rallies.

But harnessing technology that can clone a politician’s voice, and create videos so seemingly real that voters struggle to decipher reality from fiction, has naturally sparked concern.

Ashwini Vaishnaw, the communications minister, said in November that deepfakes were “a serious threat to democracy and social institutions”.

AI creator Divyendra Jadoun said he had received a “huge surge” of requests for content from his company, The Indian Deepfaker.

“There is a huge risk in this coming election, and I am pretty damn sure many people are using it for unethical activities”, the 30-year-old said.

Jadoun’s repertoire includes voice cloning, chatbots and mass dissemination of finished products through WhatsApp messaging, sharing content instantly with up to 400,000 people for 100,000 rupees ($1,200).

He insisted that he turned down offers that he disagreed with, but said it was a “very thin line” to determine whether or not a request for his services was unethical.

“Sometimes even we get confused,” he added.

Jadoun said the rapidly advancing technology was little understood by a “big part of the country”, and AI products were taken by many to be true.

“We only tend to fact-check videos which don’t align with our preconceived notions,” he warned.

‘Threat to democracy’

Most AI-generated campaign material has so far been used to lampoon rivals, especially through song.

This week a leader of the BJP’s youth wing posted an AI-generated video of Arvind Kejriwal, a leading opponent of PM Modi arrested last month in an allegation corruption case.

It shows him sitting behind bars, strumming a guitar and singing a verse from a popular Bollywood song: “Forget me, for you have to live without me now.”

Elsewhere, digitally altered videos purport to show lawmaker Asaduddin Owaisi, one of India’s most prominent Muslim politicians, singing devotional Hindu songs.

A caption alongside the video on Facebook jokes that “anything is possible” if BJP wins again.

Joyojeet Pal, an expert in the role of technology in democracy from the University of Michigan, said that ridiculing a political opponent was a more effective campaigning tool than “calling them a thug or a crook”.

Mocking opponents in political cartoons is a centuries-old tactic, but Pal warned that AI-generated images can easily be misinterpreted as real.

“It is a threat to what we can and cannot believe,” he said. “It is a threat to democracy as a whole.”

(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)



Source link

]]>