New Delhi:

The rapid rise in Futures and Options (F&O) trade volumes in recent years could pose several challenges as retail investors not following proper risk management could be impacted by sudden movements in markets, said a Reserve Bank report.

The equity derivatives segment has been witnessing growing participation from retail investors in recent years. It has gone up by 42.8 per cent from 65 lakh during 2022-23 to 95.7 lakh during 2023-24.

While trading volumes in derivatives segment has seen exponential growth over the years in notional terms, the trading volumes when measured by the premium turnover has witnessed a linear growth pattern, said the RBI’s bi-annual Financial Stability Report (FSR).

The ratio of premium turnover to cash market has remained steady over the last three years.

FSR said equity derivatives market can improve price discovery and enhance market liquidity in underlying cash markets. It, however, is also associated with higher risks.

“Since derivatives are more complex than the underlying, investor protection is a key regulatory imperative,” the report said.

A SEBI research published in January 2023 showed that 89 per cent of individual participants in F&O lost money in the segment during fiscal year 2018-19 and fiscal year 2021-22.

“…the rapid rise in F&O volumes in recent years could pose several challenges: retail investors could be impacted by sudden movements in markets without proper risk management and this could have knock-on effects on cash market; rise in popularity of shorter-duration options in indices with few stocks and high volatility could amplify leverage…,” the report said.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has instituted an expert working group, under the Secondary Markets Advisory Committee, to review F&O markets from the perspective of investor protection as well as overall systemic risk management.

SEBI is also in the process of reviewing the corpus of the Settlement Guarantee Fund (SGF), stress testing methodologies and scenarios for computation of core SGF to build a more resilient settlement system to meet contingencies arising due to failure to honour obligations by any member of a stock exchange.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

V. Anantha Nageswaran, Chief Economic Advisor. File.
| Photo Credit: Bijoy Ghosh

Chief Economic Advisor V. Anantha Nageswaran on March 14 said he is “worried” over retail investors’ play in risky Futures and Options (F&O) segment in search of instant profits.

Speaking at a conference organised by capital markets regulator Sebi and NISM, Nageswaran said the biggest threat to sustainable capital formation and also sustainable economic growth is the “short-termism” in attitudes that the country is afflicted with.

Bemoaning the “furore” caused every time, there is a discussion on allowing corporate groups to promote banks despite the need for capital in a growing economy, Mr. Nageswaran said India Inc needs to reflect on the state of corporate governance practices and analyse its own conduct.

“The biggest risk for sustained capital formation and sustained economic growth is… in our short-termism,” he said.

He added that it is “puzzling” to see that a country otherwise blessed with a “deep spiritual heritage and wisdom” is actually interpreting mindfulness and living in the present in the wrong ways.

Mr. Nageswaran rued that even now, people are mentioning handsome growth in F&O volumes, despite SEBI’s own studies suggesting that 90% of trades in the riskier segment leading to losses for investors.

“Our actions make me worry that we may be interpreting mindfulness and living in the present as being myopic,” he said, making it clear that those two concepts stress on performing one’s duty and obligations without thinking about the fruits of the actions.

He said there is a need to change the outlook from a behaviourial perspective to achieve goals like long-term capital formation and growth.

Mr. Nageswaran rued that there is an “adversarial” attitude among many stakeholders when it comes to regulators, wherein people overlook the fact a regulator’s job is to have a long-term view of things and “providing counterbalance for instant gratification or myopia”.

“The underline focus that the regulators have is to ensure that we stay stronger for longer rather than get caught up in the immediate euphoria of our growth rates, market valuations,” he said.

Amid concerns that the activity in the F&O segment is fuelled by those seeking quick profits, he said the rising exposure of small investors in the segment “is a worry because we don’t want to go through boom and bust cycles again and again”.

Mr. Nageswaran said the economy is likely to grow 7% in FY25 as well, which will make it the third year in a row when the GDP has grown at over 7%.

Stating that capital formation and economic growth are interdependent, wherein one feeds into another, he said the only mantra for policymakers in such times is not to be conventional and described India’s prudent response to the Covid crisis as a case in point.

However, sustaining high growth performance has been “elusive” for India, which has had short periods of high growth that are typically followed by a long period of balancesheet repair, dud loan cleaning for lenders, etc, he said, reminding that “we need to keep in mind that China grew around double digits for three decades”.

“There is a need to ensure that we don’t indulge in excess lending or excess borrowing in the current cycle as well”, he said, adding that we need to make detailed plans with projections on growth, capital required, how it will come, how much as debt and how much as equity.

Banks also need to be adequately capitalised to fund the growth needs of the economy, and corporate ownership of banks will have to be allowed if the banks are to get the capital, he said.

“Why is it a taboo to even discuss corporate ownership of banks? The fact that a mere discussion of the idea of licensing of banks to corporate houses creates such a backlash or a furore is indeed a cause for reflection on the part of the corporates too,” he said.

“It is also unfortunately a reflection on the overall state of corporate governance in the country,” Mr. Nageswaran said.