Trinamool Congress MP Abhishek Banerjee speaks to the media during the Monsoon session of Parliament, in New Delhi, on August 10, 2026.
| Photo Credit: PTI

People gather amid the demolition of the party office of Trinamool Congress MP Abhishek Banerjee after it was allegedly found to be constructed without an approved building plan and in violation of applicable rules, in Amtala, South 24 Parganas district, West Bengal, on July 18, 2026.
| Photo Credit: PTI

Trinamool Congress general secretary and Diamond Harbour MP Abhishek Banerjee did not turn up for interrogation despite summons from the CID.
| Photo Credit: ANI

Image used for representational purposes. File
| Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

Kolkata:

The parents of the 31-year-old doctor, who was raped and murdered on duty at Kolkata’s RG Kar Medical College and Hospital, have approached Calcutta High Court, flagging concerns in the CBI’s investigation and seeking the court’s intervention in the case that shook the nation.

The single-judge bench of Justice Tirthankar Ghosh said the matter is before the Supreme Court and the bench can hear it only after it is clear if the top court is monitoring the probe. The next hearing on the matter could take place around January 15.

In their petition before the high court, the doctor’s parents have said they are “aggrieved” and “dissatisfied” with the central agency’s investigation into the rape-murder case. The parents said “relevant witnesses who were present with the daughter of the petitioners at the night of the incident have not been arrayed in the list of witnesses and nor being questioned till date”. “From the purport of the entire examination and investigation, it would be evident that the entire trial is being conducted in a manner to implicate and target only one person who is accused Sanjay Roy in exclusion of the other suspects. From the post-mortem report itself it is evident that Sanjay Roy cannot be the only person who had conducted the offence,” the petition says.

A civic volunteer, Roy was arrested by Kolkata Police and charged with the rape and murder of the doctor. His custody passed on to the CBI after it took over the investigation following a court order.

The parents noted that the CBI has not filed a supplementary chargesheet naming Dr Sandip Ghosh, former principal of RG Kar Medical College, and Abhijeet Mondal, officer-in-charge of the local police station. Ghosh and Mondal were granted bail on December 13 after the CBI did not file a chargesheet within 90 days. While Mondal has walked out, Ghosh is in jail in a financial irregularities case.

The doctor’s parents have said the trial court is proceeding expeditiously on the Supreme Court’s directions. But the investigation has been “compromised”, they claimed.

“Unless further investigation is directed the case cannot be brought to a logical ending and the other suspects would remain untouched owing to the manner of investigation. Once the trial is concluded, the petitioner shall be remediless as justice would be compromised,” they said.

The 31-year-old doctor, a postgraduate trainee, was found raped and murdered in a seminar room of the state-run hospital on the morning of August 9. The chilling incident sparked a nationwide conversation on the safety of women in the workplace and the need for robust measures to protect healthcare staff on duty.

Kolkata:

Hearing a petition by West Bengal’s Leader of the Opposition Suvendu Adhikari on an alleged attack by “radicals” during a Kali Puja procession in Kolkata, the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday asked the state government to file a report and ensure that peace is maintained. 

Noting that the petition had been filed by the leader of the opposition in the state Assembly, the court said, “We had earlier said that the first petitioner (Mr Adhikari) should not exhaust himself. He holds a very responsible position. It is very surprising for me to see the leader of the opposition as a petitioner. Usually, it is the head of the party’s legal cell or something like that.”

Mr Adhikari had alleged that a Kali Puja procession was attacked by a mob in Kolkata’s Rajabazar and Narkeldanga areas on Saturday. Posting videos on X, the BJP leader had accused the police of being in a slumber and demanded the deployment of central forces to protect people who are being attacked by “radicals” in Bengal. 

The statements were seen as an attack on the Trinamool Congress, which is in power in the state. 

Countering his claim, the Kolkata Police said an attempt was being made to create a false narrative. 

In a post on X, the police said, “An attempt has been made on social media to create a fake narrative about the incident at Narkeldanga. No Kali Puja immersion procession was attacked. The issue was related to the parking of a bike, which led to a fight between two individuals, and escalated.”

“However, police intervened timely and brought the situation under control. The scheduled Kali Puja immersion procession was completed peacefully and without any hindrance,” it said in the post. 

In court on Wednesday, Mr Adhikari’s lawyer argued said some people in West Bengal were waging a war against the integrity of the country and claimed some puja pandals had also been attacked. 

The High Court bench directed the state to file an affidavit with all annexures by November 13 and said a pen drive with a video of the incident must also be placed on record. Posting the matter for hearing on November 21, the court directed the state to ensure that peace is maintained in the meantime.

Port Blair:

The Calcutta High Court’s Port Blair circuit bench has refused to interfere in the government’s decision to change the name of the capital of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, saying it is the prerogative of the executive.

On September 13, the central government renamed Port Blair to Sri Vijaya Puram.

Hearing a petition challenging the renaming, a division bench comprising Justices Ravi Krishan Kapur and Prasenjit Biswas on Friday refused to intervene as it is the prerogative of the executive.

The court cited the renaming of Bombay to Mumbai to highlight the executive’s prerogative.

Advocate Prohit Mohan Lall who filed the petition then withdrew it.

Union Home Minister Amit Shah had said, “While the earlier name had a colonial legacy, Sri Vijaya Puram symbolises the victory achieved in India’s freedom struggle and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands’ unique role in it.”

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Kolkata:

An “absolute failure of state machinery” led to the vandalism at Kolkata’s RG Kar Hospital late Wednesday and early Thursday, the Calcutta High Court said this morning, as it warned the Bengal government it would order the medical facility to be closed if state police could not protect it.

The High Court directed the CBI to submit an interim report on the “pre-planned” vandalism. The court had earlier directed the CBI to investigate the killing of the doctor, noting there could be “no further loss of time” amid claims by the doctor’s parents of serious lapses by hospital administration and cops.  

The medical college was the scene of a grisly murder, and potential rape, on August 9, which has triggered protests and political squabbles nationwide, including Thursday’s ‘Reclaim The Night’ movement during which a mob clashed with police and vandalised parts of the hospital.

In response to the court’s questions about the vandalism, the state explained, “… there was a mob of around 7,000. The number suddenly swelled… I have videos. They broke barricades… tear gas was fired and 15 police personnel were injured. Deputy Commissioner was injured. Police vehicles damaged. Emergency room ransacked (but) place of occurrence (the crime scene) was protected.”

“Hard To Believe Police Didn’t Know…”

But the court, which came down strongly on the hospital administration and the cops in earlier hearings too – after the doctors’ parents alleged negligence – seemed to dismiss the argument.

A bench led by Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam demanded to know why permission was granted for public protests on so volatile an issue. “Normally police has an intelligence wing… similar things happened on Hanuman Jayanti. If 7,000 are to gather, it hard to believe police did not know.”

The state responded that no permission had been granted, but the High Court refused to let the matter drop, pointing out that Section 144 (which prohibits large public gatherings in notified areas) was in effect at the time. “… you should have cordoned off the area,” the cops were told.

“7,000 people can’t come walking…” the court continued, waving away the state’s arguments.

“Absolute Failure Of State Machinery”

“This is an absolute failure of state machinery…” the court thundered, “So they (the police) couldn’t protect their own men? A sorry state of affairs. How will doctors there work fearlessly?”

“You are taking measures? What are the preventive measures?” the court also asked.

Meanwhile, arguing for the parents, senior advocate Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya, claimed the police “hid behind the protesters” and argued that a misunderstanding, and not police action, had saved the crime scene from vandalism.

READ | Mamata’s Sunday Ultimatum To CBI For Death Penalty In Rape-Murder

“These hooligans went to look for the third floor.. third floor means fourth storey in Bengali, which was the place of occurrence. They misunderstood and went to the second floor instead, thereby saving the crime scene. State machinery failed… crime scene was RG Kar Hospital and police couldn’t save it.”

The parents’ counsel also flagged demolition/renovation work near the crime scene, which hospital authorities have said had been planned earlier and had nothing to do with the crime.

“What was the urgency…” the court asked, “You go to any district court… no ladies washroom. PwD (Public Works Department) does nothing… what was the need here?”

“We will close down the hospital. We will shift everyone. How many patients are there?” the court raged, even as the state repeatedly assured the court “the crime scene is secure”.

“Okay… we take your word,” the court finally said, but added, “You should also be disturbed! Being a citizen of the city it pains me… It should pain you also.”

READ | 9 Arrested For Violence At Hospital Where Doctor Was Raped-Murdered

The High Court eventually ordered the police, who have arrested nine people so far, to place all details about the protest, including a timeline of events, before the CBI and said the federal agency “is directed to proceed as deemed appropriate.” The court also emphasised the need for protection for doctors.

Kolkata:

The probe into the chilling rape and murder of a 31-year-old doctor in Kolkata’s RG Kar Medical College and Hospital must be transferred to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), the Calcutta High Court ruled today.

The court noted serious lapses in the hospital administration’s response after the doctor was found dead in its seminar hall on Friday morning, her clothes in disarray and injuries all over her body. The victim’s parents, the court said, want an investigation by an independent body to ensure that evidence is not tampered with.

The court today came down heavily on Dr Sandip Ghosh, the former principal of the state-run college, saying it was “disheartening” that he was not “proactive”. The court also flagged that the former Principal was given the same role in another college hours after he resigned and said he must be immediately relieved of duties and sent on leave.

Dr Ghosh stepped down yesterday, saying that he cannot take the humiliation on social media in the wake of the doctor’s rape-murder. Hours later, he was given a new role as the Principal of Calcutta National Medical College. This sparked a wave of protest, as protesting doctors questioned the rush behind his new appointment.

Pulling up the state government for giving a new role to Dr Ghosh shortly after his resignation, the court said, “The appropriate authority should have borne in mind the circumstances under which the resignation was given. Therefore, even that resignation was not accepted, the least that can be expected from the department is to release the Principal from the administrative responsibility and not assign him any other duty of equal responsibility. This professor has been made Principal of another medical college. It is not clear as to what was the urgency in doing so.”

The hospital administration, the court noted, was not with the victim or the family of the victim. “The case on hand is a peculiar case. There should be no further loss of time. There may be possibility of evidence being tampered,” the court said.

The high court also noted that it would have given more time to state police under “normal circumstances”. “Even after five days there have been no significant conclusions which should have happened by now. Therefore, we are justified that there is every possibility that evidence will be destroyed. We deem it appropriate that the case must be transferred to CBI with immediate effect,” the court said.

Earlier, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee had said Kolkata Police must complete their probe by Sunday, failing which the state government would recommend a CBI probe if the victims’ parents want. Opposition parties, led by the BJP, had demanded a central agency probe, warning against tampering of proof if state police investigated the case that has sent shockwaves through the nation.

The Calcutta High Court on Friday directed that Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee is free to make any statement concerning Governor C V Ananda Bose, not crossing the contours of freedom of speech and public duty.

“Otherwise, the appellants run the risk of being exposed to a claim for heavy damages and other retaliatory actions,” the division bench, comprising Justices Biswaroop Chowdhury and I P Mukerji, said modifying the single bench order.

Ms Banerjee and Trinamool Congress leader Kunal Ghosh had moved an appeal before a division bench, challenging an interim order by a single bench directing the Chief Minister and three others not to make any defamatory or incorrect statement against the Governor by way of publication and on social platforms till August 14.

The court noted that the lawyers for the respondents in the defamation suit have “very correctly stated” that the statements referred to in the body of the judgment of the single judge “have not even prima facie been declared to be defamatory of his excellency or incorrect”.

“In the absence of such declaration, what is the defamatory statement referred to in the impugned order which is being restrained from being published in future is not known. This order applies to statements being made by the appellants in future,” the division bench said.

Passing the order, it observed that a man’s reputation is sacrosanct to him and that the law gives him the right to protect it.

“An important part of this reputation is his moral character,” the court observed, noting that the freedom of speech and expression is conferred on every citizen of India as a fundamental right.

Holding that this right “cannot be throttled or gagged”, the bench said this freedom of expression is subject to reasonable restrictions.

The court said one of the restrictions applicable in this case is the restriction that applies to words, spoken or written, that tend to defame others.

The bench observed that public has the right to know the truth and if the truth is in the public interest, a member of the public has every right to expose it.

“If this right is vested in every citizen, such right is vested with more responsibility in the Chief Minister,” it said.

The bench also said that expression of this freedom is, however, subject to certain conditions under the law of defamation.

“The first is that it should stand the test of justification or truth or must be a fair comment or the maker of the statement must owe a duty to the persons to whom the defamatory statement was published, which is described as qualified privilege.

“If the maker fails the test he is liable to pay damages in the civil action and may be charged with commission of an offence,” the bench observed.

Mr Bose had sought to restrain Ms Banerjee, two newly elected MLAs and another Trinamool Congress leader from issuing remarks in connection with alleged incidents at Raj Bhavan.

The Bengal Governor filed the defamation suit against Mamata Banerjee’s comment that women had expressed fear about visiting the Raj Bhavan, which he said were “erroneous and slanderous impressions”.

The Chief Minister made the comment while expressing her displeasure over the confusion regarding the oath-taking ceremony of two newly elected party MLAs. She had backed their decision of not accepting the Governor’s invitation to go to Raj Bhavan and attend the oath ceremony there.

The MLAs, Sayantika Banerjee and Reyat Hossain Sarkar, had written to him seeking to take oath at the assembly.