Amazon lawsuit – Artifex.News https://artifex.news Stay Connected. Stay Informed. Sat, 16 May 2026 02:06:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 https://artifex.news/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cropped-cropped-app-logo-32x32.png Amazon lawsuit – Artifex.News https://artifex.news 32 32 Consumers sue Amazon for not refunding Trump tariff costs https://artifex.news/article70985876-ece/ Sat, 16 May 2026 02:06:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70985876-ece/ Read More “Consumers sue Amazon for not refunding Trump tariff costs” »

]]>

Consumers in a proposed ⁠class action filed in federal court in Seattle alleged that the e-commerce giant collected hundreds of millions of dollars in unlawful tariff costs by ‌raising prices on imported goods before the Supreme Court had ruled.
| Photo Credit: Reuters

Amazon.com Inc was sued on Friday (May 15, 2026) by consumers seeking refunds for costs passed on to ​them in the form of higher prices as a result of ‌tariffs the U.S. Supreme Court later concluded had been unlawfully ​imposed by President Donald Trump.

Consumers in a proposed ⁠class action filed in federal court in Seattle alleged that the e-commerce giant collected hundreds of millions of dollars in unlawful tariff costs by ‌raising prices on imported goods before the Supreme Court had ruled.

The U.S. Supreme Court in February concluded ‌in a 6-3 decision that Mr. Trump overstepped his authority ‌by ⁠using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose ⁠his sweeping tariffs.

Thousands of companies have begun to seek billions of dollars in refunds from the government following the ruling.

But Amazon has not, which the ​lawsuit alleged was “not because it ‌lacks a legal basis to do so, but because it seeks to curry favour with Mr. Trump by allowing the federal government to retain the funds.”

“The problem is that the ‌funds Amazon is using to stay in the President’s good ​graces do not belong to Amazon,” the lawsuit says. “These funds were wrongfully taken from consumers to cover ⁠IEEPA Tariffs that have since been invalidated.”

The lawsuit asserts claims of unjust enrichment and violation of Washington state’s consumer-protection law.

Amazon did ‌not respond to a request for comment.

The lawsuit follows several earlier cases filed by consumers accusing companies ranging from Costco to Nike to FedEx of failing to pass on tariff refunds to consumers.

Unlike companies that imported goods, consumers are not eligible to seek tariff refunds from the government for the higher ‌costs they incurred while they were in effect, Friday’s (May 15) lawsuit notes.

To support ​its claim that politics were behind Amazon’s actions, the lawsuit notes that in April 2025, the company ⁠faced White House blowback after a report that it was considering displaying ⁠how much of a product’s cost came from the IEEPA tariffs.

Amazon denied the story and said it never ‌considered listing tariff prices on its main retail site. But the report prompted Mr. Trump to call Amazon Executive Chairman ​Jeff Bezos to complain, the lawsuit says.



Source link

]]>
U.S. sues Amazon for breaking antitrust law, harming consumers https://artifex.news/article67350202-ece/ Tue, 26 Sep 2023 16:31:38 +0000 https://artifex.news/article67350202-ece/ Read More “U.S. sues Amazon for breaking antitrust law, harming consumers” »

]]>

September 26, 2023 10:01 pm | Updated 10:37 pm IST – WASHINGTON D.C.

A logo of the Amazon fulfillment is seen outside the Amazon fulfillment centre in Kent, Washington. File
| Photo Credit: Reuters

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission filed a long-awaited antitrust lawsuit against Amazon.com on September 26, charging the online retailer with harming consumers with higher prices in the latest U.S. government legal action aimed at breaking Big Tech’s dominance of the internet.

The lawsuit had been expected after years of complaints that Amazon.com and other tech giants abused their dominance of search, social media and online retailing to become gate keepers on the most lucrative aspects of the internet.

Amazon said that the FTC lawsuit was wrongheaded and would hurt consumers by leading to higher prices and slower deliveries.

“The practices the FTC is challenging have helped to spur competition and innovation across the retail industry, and have produced greater selection, lower prices, and faster delivery speeds for Amazon customers and greater opportunity for the many businesses that sell in Amazon’s store,” said David Zapolsky, Amazon’s general counsel.

The lawsuit, which was joined by 17 State attorneys general, follows a four-year investigation and federal lawsuits filed against Alphabet’s Google and Meta Platforms’ Facebook.

“The FTC and its State partners say Amazon’s actions allow it to stop rivals and sellers from lowering prices, degrade quality for shoppers, overcharge sellers, stifle innovation, and prevent rivals from fairly competing against Amazon,” the agency said in a statement.

The FTC said that it was asking the court to issue a permanent injunction ordering Amazon.com to stop its unlawful conduct. The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Seattle, where Amazon is based.

Amazon shares were down 3%.

The FTC said that Amazon, founded in 1994 and worth more than $1 trillion, punished sellers that sought to offer prices that were lower than Amazon’s by making it difficult for consumers to find the seller on Amazon’s platform.

Other allegations include that Amazon gave preference to its own products on its platforms over competitors also on the platform.

FTC chair Lina Khan said that Amazon had used illegal tactics to fend off companies that would have risen to challenge its monopoly.

“Amazon is now exploiting that monopoly power to harm its customers, both the tens of millions of families that shop on Amazon’s platform and the hundreds of thousands of sellers that use Amazon to reach them,” she said.

Ms. Khan, while a law student, wrote about Amazon.com’s dominance in online retailing for The Yale Law Journal and was on the staff of the House committee that wrote a report issued in 2020 that advocated reining in four tech giants: Amazon.com, Apple, Google and Facebook.

The need to take action against Big Tech has been one of the few ideas that Democrats and Republicans have agreed on. During the Trump administration which ended in 2021, the Justice Department and FTC opened probes into Google, Facebook, Apple and Amazon.

The Justice Department has sued Google twice – once under Republican Donald Trump regarding its search business and a second time on advertising technology since Democratic President Joe Biden took office. The FTC sued Facebook during the Trump administration and Biden’s FTC has pressed forward with the lawsuit.



Source link

]]>