ai in judiciary – Artifex.News https://artifex.news Stay Connected. Stay Informed. Tue, 30 Jun 2026 03:45:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3 https://artifex.news/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cropped-cropped-app-logo-32x32.png ai in judiciary – Artifex.News https://artifex.news 32 32 Academic bats for AI as aid, not substitute, in judiciary https://artifex.news/article71164209-ecerand29/ Tue, 30 Jun 2026 03:45:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article71164209-ecerand29/ Read More “Academic bats for AI as aid, not substitute, in judiciary” »

]]>

Artificial Intelligence (AI) should be used to strengthen judicial administration, but judicial decision-making must remain with human judges, a senior law professor said while addressing an international conference in Brussels on the role of AI and Machine Learning in judicial functioning.

Prof. (Dr.) Ashutosh Mishra, Registrar of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar National Law University, Sonipat, made the remarks at the conference, Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Judicial Functioning, organised by the Centre for Indo-European Cooperation (CIEC), Brussels. 

The event brought together judges, legal scholars, policymakers, researchers, diplomats and technology experts from India and Europe to discuss the growing role of AI in judicial systems.

Prof. Mishra said AI-powered technologies could significantly improve legal research, document management, case administration, translation and other court-related functions, making the justice delivery system more efficient, transparent and accessible.

He, however, maintained that constitutional values, judicial independence, ethical standards and human sensitivity could not be replaced by technology, and that AI should remain a support tool rather than a substitute for judges.

Highlighting the need to integrate technological innovation with legal education, Prof. Mishra said law schools should prepare future legal professionals for an AI-enabled justice ecosystem through interdisciplinary education, advanced research and skill development. He added that academic programmes should combine technological competence with constitutional values, ethical governance and the rule of law.

Referring to Dr. B.R. Ambedkar National Law University, Sonipat, he said the institution was committed to equipping students for emerging challenges at the intersection of law and technology.

Prof. Mishra also called for greater collaboration between India and Europe in legal education, research, technology and public policy, saying such international engagements would promote the responsible and ethical use of AI in judicial systems while improving efficiency, transparency, accountability and access to justice.



Source link

]]>
‘Justice Unplugged 2026’: extending learning beyond the classroom https://artifex.news/article70689405-ecerand29/ Sat, 28 Feb 2026 19:42:00 +0000 https://artifex.news/article70689405-ecerand29/ Read More “‘Justice Unplugged 2026’: extending learning beyond the classroom” »

]]>

(L-R) The Hindu CEO L V Navaneeth, Founder and Chancellor of VIT G Viswanathan, Supreme Court Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, The Hindu Director N . Ram, Vice President of VIT G V Selvam and The Hindu Editor in chief Suresh Nambath during The Hindu Justice Unplugged 2026 in New Delhi on February 28, 2026.
| Photo Credit: Photo R V Moorthy

‘Justice Unplugged 2026’, a joint initiative of The Hindu and VIT, Chennai, was held on Saturday (February 28, 2026) in New Delhi. Experts and practitioners in the legal field discussed topics ranging from legal education and technology to constitutional thinking and enhancing legal access.

The guests at the inaugural included Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, Judge, Supreme Court; Abhishek Manu Singhvi, senior advocate and G. Viswanathan, founder and chancellor, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT).

“We are in a country where we do not allow the provisions of the Constitution to influence our personal behaviour,” said S. Muralidhar, former Chief Justice of the Orissa High Court and now a senior advocate of the Supreme Court.

“The mob is not something that should inform a judgment,” Senior Advocate Karuna Nundy said talking about constitutional morality, cautioning that majoritarian sentiment cannot override constitutional guarantees.

More than two years after a sign language interpreter assisted a hearing impaired lawyer during Supreme Court proceedings for the first time, accessibility in courtrooms remains inconsistent and difficult to secure, say Advocate-on-Record Sanchita Ain and advocate Sarah Sunny while talking about accessibility in courts.



Source link

]]>